Comments by "Rune of Svalbard" (@vladimirofsvalbard9477) on "The Recount" channel.

@jerrylundegaard2592 You're negating a lot of factors here. Homogenous cultures, significantly lower rates of disease, large oil legacy funds in places like Norway from petrol proceeds, etc. I don't see the connection, nor would I make a blind assumption that a country is better by however it measures happiness. Are you aware that Scandinavia also has some of the largest consumptions of anti-depressants in the world? Thinking that alleged socialist policies somehow merit themselves because you can draw a short statistical conclusion about happiness is bizarre. If you have spent considerable time there, then I'd imagine you'd see that it was the culture that made the difference. Not an abstract of social economic policies that confirm your biases. Are you aware of any social-economic policies that make people in America happy? I can tell you first hand that people using them are some of the most unhappy people in the world. Why draw a conclusion that isn't there?
6
Democrats will start to grow when they stop trying to find their new Barack Hussein Jesus.
1
It's the culture! Americans have always valued gambling and ponzi schemes. Why would you trust any politician or entity to keep their word? It's always been every man for himself here; nothing has changed since it's inception.
1
@keelingcurve58 Please, I've lived through enough climate hoaxes that I would have been a turkey melt by now (according to these scientists). I think if people focused more on the corruption in the institutions; they wouldn't fall for these things. Too many people act like these are the words of God and that there's no conflict of interest.
1
Election 2028: (Democrats) - LOOK it's the spawn of Trump running for election! He must be terrible! Literally, they're strategy going forward.
1
Democrats are still desperately trying to replace Barack Hussein Jesus; I mean Obama.
1
It's because women 18-35 are a massive Democrat stronghold right now. They expected the men to do the same, but it was the opposite. Tbh, I think social media is driving the female craze behind the equity movement. No maternal woman would ever vouch for a system that makes it harder for them to have as many children and as much resources as possible for their family. Which flows directly with the trend of many younger women wanting to ditch maternity and act like men; have long careers and compete for resources. Social media affects women differently because their mating psychology is vicious. It rewired their brains to focus their on competing against men in status; rather than women in mating. The reason is that social media allows a vicious minority of filthy women to intentionally poison the minds of other women so that they can have more resources to themselves or less for others. Feminism has never been about equality. It's about a minority of women tricking other women into reducing their own status and potential. Misery loves company. Successful women get the men they want and the other low status women get to flatter themselves with thoughts of stopping other women from mating. A woman's true psychology is about poisoning other women so that they can't reproduce. This is why you'll never see a long term friend group of girls; it's all about competition.
1