Comments by "Rune of Svalbard" (@vladimirofsvalbard9477) on "Bite-sized Philosophy" channel.

  1. It's not sick, it's a normal distribution of human evolution. Thinking that humans evolved for 200,000 years and then women 'decide' to have children (devoid of biological patterns) is ignorant beyond belief.
    3
  2. Nobody is, but reality will hit you like a brick. IQ tests have been a solid science since around 1930. It's not about putting people in a box; it's about realizing the reality surrounding our economy. You need an IQ in the 90s to at least use a smartphone. Considering we have 45 Million people at 85 or below, I'd say that's a problem. If you take a personality and IQ test, it may help you to understand what you are best suited for. Trying to attempt fields and work loads that you are not suited for is pure agony over time. For example, if you're low in conscientiousness, trying to become a manager will be absolutely miserable.
    2
  3.  @DiegoPerez08  Relax Diego, neuroticism doesn't solve the world's problems. Putting a person with a low IQ in a job field that they cannot function in is NOT virtue, it's virtue signalling. People are much happier when they have the cognitive ability to do their job of choice.
    2
  4. Most of the time science is inconvenient. That doesn't mean it was created by someone with an agenda. Although that doesn't stop people from using it to justify theirs.
    1
  5. You and everybody else. If everyone is special, then nobody is. I would advise a blue collar job (as grueling as that may be). I used my CDL to get my first house and then I jumped ship in the industry.
    1
  6. lol my wife says I apologize too much; I guess I'm acquitted?
    1
  7. I disagree, the most evil people I've ever met always thought they were doing good things. Normal day people can do and think evils things (as well as) feel shame and resentment about their actions.
    1
  8. What kind of people are you hanging around that make Peterson seem to lack articulation?
    1
  9. A test that gives consistent results is a good test. Whether it measures exterior areas is an entirely different question. You shouldn't conflate the two. IQ measurement has been a solid science for around a century. Unless you can prove that tests are producing a wide range of results for the same person, then it's rather sound. Proponents of the equity movement have made it a hobby to try and regress with revisions because it challenges their agenda. The only way you can attempt to initiate a system of equity is to ignore any and all research regarding differences in people.
    1
  10.  @lawboss  Believe? An IQ test measures pattern recognition primarily in geometry and sentence structure. It's a processing speed test essentially. You should read Charles Murray's Bell Curve on how IQ tests were perfected to incorporate culture and language barriers to create consistent results cross-culturally.
    1