Comments by "VisibilityFoggy" (@VisibilityFoggy) on "What damage could Iranian military do to the US?" video.

@ppocka-XD - Oh, give us all a break. Different people conquered different lands for centuries. I bet you would never post anything here arguing that the Muslims shouldn't have invaded other lands and seized them at the tip of a spear. The fact that a group of nomadic tribes that were at constant war with each other and couldn't be at peace long enough develop any semblance of technology lost land to a group of Europeans that were technologically superior is an obvious conclusion. The better and smarter side won – period.
3
Mexico literally doesn't have an air force with any planes at this point. The drug cartels would be a more effective force than the regular army, save the Mexico Marinas, which are squared away. Actually, the USMC might find some good recruits south of the border! ;)
2
@Kayzef2003 - Iranians aren't Arabs. They're Persians. And they hate their own tyrannical government. Most Iranians would probably rather live under Trump than the old fossil mullahs in charge of things over there.
2
You must really love living under dictatorships. So much for the fun of booze, dating apps, marijuana, hookers and gambling.
1
@kaptain_krunch - Why, in a billion years, would the U.S. want to occupy a cash-sucking welfare state invaded by phony "refugees" from across the planet? Europeans must have pretty big egos to actually believe they would be worth invading in the first place.
1
@Regis1995 - No, they would remain neutral, just as the U.S. remained neutral (well, technically we helped the UK behind the scenes) in the Falklands, which technically violated the Monroe doctrine.
1
@DumpsterDolphinin - Judging by most Europeans I know, nobody seems to like the E.U. If anything, Europe is adopting policies more closely linked to Trump than the delusional EU parliament.
1
@davidparfitt9009 - My guess - the Brits would provide ELINT assistance and resupply assistance (if needed) analogous to the Falklands conflict. In reality, the U.S. would likely use Keflavik airport in Iceland for any military operations. The US Air Force ran the entire show there until a few years ago, and Iceland is suffering from a tourism drop after WOW airlines went bankrupt. They could use some cozy relations with America to drum up business.
1
@kesofat - The B-52 isn't used for deep penetration bombing, you idiot. It launches standoff missiles before air superiority is achieved, then goes in for conventional bombing runs once aerial threats are neutralized. Most likely, your crappy SAMs would be taken out by missiles from B-52s almost 1,000 kms away.
1
Man, this comment section is gonna break the internet...
1
@jacktheflipper3591 - I only know the Australian word for beer, as advertised on TV.
1
@yaz2928 - This American does.
1
@yaz2928 - Yeah, most actually do. Can't wait for 2020 when the gloves come off!
1
@yaz2928 - You obviously have zero understanding of the American electoral system. You're either from another country or a Democrat.
1
It'd be a turkey shoot 'til you guys get your fleet of Gripen-E fighters. Then nobody will want to mess with Brazil! If it were up to me, we'd kick Turkey out of NATO and bring Brazil in!
1