Comments by "VisibilityFoggy" (@VisibilityFoggy) on "Could UKRAINE defend itself against an INVASION by RUSSIA? - VisualPolitik EN" video.

  1. In fairness, the Emu separatists in Australia are always lurking in the darkness, plotting their next move.
    23
  2. Newman (and a patriotic Ukrainian on the NYC subway) strongly disagree.
    6
  3. Well, technically they began defending themselves against an invasion after they were already invaded and lost.
    5
  4.  @ds1991  Taiwan is infinitely more wealthy than Ukraine, and is geographically located in one of the world's most important global transport sectors. Taiwan also manufactures its own combat aircraft, ships and weaponry and essentially represents the entire world's source of semiconductors. There is almost no comparison here.
    5
  5. Forced cooperation is not cooperation. It's servitude. How much is Vlad paying you to post YouTube comments?
    4
  6. No, it doesn't.
    4
  7. It makes sense if Russia has literally annexed your territory and massed hundreds of thousands of troops on your border.
    3
  8. Nobody in the west ever had a problem with Turkey until you elected your current wackjob president who has Islamic/Sharia aspirations and is trying to bully the Greeks. As a woman, keep in mind that Erdogan really isn't happy about your right to come on here and speak freely. He'd probably rather have you covered up like Saudi women.
    3
  9.  @polishherowitoldpilecki5521  If you're talking about Bald and Bankrupt's cat, then sure...
    2
  10. I smell a CCP/Putin troll. The people in Tibet simply want their country back. You aren't a "separatist" if your country was forced at gunpoint to join another. As for Syria, you're mixing up a civil war with a separatist movement. If the U.S. wanted Assad removed that badly, he would have been gone by now.
    2
  11. It makes sense, though. Why would NATO member states want to consciously put themselves in the middle of a conflict that already exists? The purpose of NATO is to deter conflict in the first place.
    2
  12. WOODKA!
    2
  13. Perhaps the best course of action is to simply leave Ukraine alone...
    2
  14.  @Paerigos  Russia could certainly fire off some missiles at the Baltic states, but this is essentially guaranteed to start World War III after one of them invokes Article V. Russian forces forward deployed in an offensive posture have absolutely no way to defend against devastating airstrikes from American heavy bombers, their supply lines would be decimated by naval strikes and blockades, and a good many air bases would be destroyed in the first day of war with a NATO coalition. Remember, as much as people hype Russia's military "hardness," they can't even keep a single aircraft carrier afloat. They've produced a total of a dozen fifth-generation fighters while the U.S. has produced thousands. This isn't the USSR we used to (legitimately) fear.
    1
  15. Well then they're pretty damn stupid.
    1
  16. Russia genuinely has no reason to fear an invasion because no country on Earth would want to become responsible for that corrupt wasteland of missed opportunity. Russia needs a leader to stand up for its people and join the free and democratic world.
    1
  17.  @JordanHarbingerShow  The main asset they sold to China was a pre-production model of the Su-33 carrier-borne fighter, which was adapted to Chinese service. Unfortunately, the Su-33 is so bogged down by its own weight that it can't take off with a heavy weapons loadout. Not to mention that it has ancient avionics. India chose the damn MiG-29K, a perpetual loser in air-to-air combat, instead of it, and now they're testing out F/A-18s to replace them.
    1
  18. Right. Anything you personally disagree with is "propaganda."
    1
  19.  @JonWintersGold  Well, "losing" is a subjective term when it comes to that election.
    1
  20. The BMW they featured in the ad looked like a mid-90s model, so you're not too far off lol.
    1
  21. Or even simpler, you could just keep NATO as is and change its name, if it really matters that much to you.
    1
  22.  @theshadowman1398  Uhh, no. They're only legit if the vote isn't conducted at gunpoint.
    1