Comments by "VisibilityFoggy" (@VisibilityFoggy) on "Mark Felton Productions"
channel.
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
6
-
5
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
There are a few more layers to this. First, the air complement of the QE could be surged. The F-35s offer both ISR as well as air defense capability, bonus in stealth form. There is also the USAF F-15 fleet Lakenheath, which would obviously defend its base, but would also be networked into the larger air defense picture through Link 16. Not to mention, since Article V would have been invoked at this point, these Russian jets would have to get through multiple intercept attempts by every NATO member state along the way. The Tu-160 is a platform largely equivalent to the B-1B. It has a massive radar cross section and would easily find itself in the no-escape-zone of modern air-to-air missiles like the Meteor and AMRAAM-D. The Blackjack's role in modern conflict will be conducting airstrikes and providing air support once air superiority has already been achieved and a no-fly-zone imposed.
All this said, I think stealthy strategic bombers are still of use, especially when they can also serve in roles such as a low-observable comms node, ISR platform, maybe even AWACS. That's all planned for the B-21 project. It might be worth it for the RAF to jump back into the bomber game... there's been some talk of Australia buying them.
1
-
1