Comments by "VisibilityFoggy" (@VisibilityFoggy) on "How to Reform the Police (LegalEagle’s Law Review)" video.
-
10
-
1
-
This I can agree with. There are too many things that are illegal, especially personal choices like whether to consume cannabis. And we can debate these big reform programs, but let's start with something simple: no more pulling people over for a brake light being out, a tinted window, a plate cover that touches the name of the state and is technically "illegal." Even rolling stop signs, a failure to signal, minor speeding barely touching a white line, etc. A driver should have to demonstrate an articulated danger to the safety of others before they can be stopped.These minor traffic infractions are fishing expeditions. They lead to "the smell of marijuana," which is probable cause to search, which ends in someone being arrested or having to go through "the system," or someone running which can lead to an armed confrontation. In my opinion, simple reforms to reduce the number of traffic stops would make a bigger difference than going after qualified immunity or other broad-based, top-down reforms that will likely lead to a whole different set of problems down the road.
1
-
1
-
One of the issues they have found, particularly in very violent cities like Camden, Detroit, etc., is that few residents want to become police officers, and of those who do, they cannot pass a background check due to either past convictions or ties to gang members. In Trenton, N.J. (a very violent city), they do have this rule in place. Officers have to live three or five years (forget which) in the city. They all live on about two blocks at the edge of town, and none of them have children until they leave for a suburb. I couldn't believe it when a friend who was an officer there showed me the "cop streets." They looked like this strange oasis amidst the chaos of the rest of that town. It's a nice requirement, in theory, but it simply doesn't work in practice.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1