Comments by "Seven Proxies" (@sevenproxies4255) on "What Do The Koreans Think Of U.S. Mass Shootings? | ASIAN BOSS" video.

  1. Uh no actually they're proving that their IQ is lower by being irrational about firearms.
    10
  2. Daniel Shin: So does most states in the U.S. ESPECIALLY those states that practice the least amount if gun control. Take away chicago and detroit, and the U.S ends up pretty far down on the list of gun violence. And both chicago and detroit are cities with heavy gun control. Gun control doesn't work. A person with high IQ and mathematical understanding of statistics knows this. Irrational, low IQ people doesn't.
    9
  3. Daniel Shin: No korea has a low gun fatality rate because Korea is not afflicted with the same problems, unrelated to the guns themselves that the U.S has to contend with. Are you seriously suggesting that if we went and put a gun in the hand of each korean, they would start killing eachother just because they suddenly had guns?
    3
  4. Great. Now show them actual gun crime statistics from the U.S that clearly proves that you are more likely to get shot and killed by a criminal with a firearm in the states and cities with the heaviest gun control, compared to the states and cities with the most liberal gun laws and see how the Koreans react to that fact.
    3
  5. Dankthrone 88: Well the fact that the states in the U.S with the LEAST gun control and where legal gun owners are much more numerous are statistically a lot safer compared to the states with the most gun control should be proof enough that regular, law abiding citizens owning guns is not the problem.
    3
  6. kopxpert: Proving that the people in your country are inferior and probably irrationally afraid of guns, to the point where they barely know anything about them.
    3
  7. Daniel Shin: Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia were also countries were only police and military were allowed to have weapons. How well did that turn out for the unarmed civilian populations?
    3
  8. Nabriales: Considering the U.S pretty much rules the world, I'd say their constiution works pretty fucking well and is far from "defective".
    2
  9. Marcus Hamner: Not it doesn't. Fighting fire with fire is what prevents chaos, because the evil person thinking of subjugating you at gunpoint will have to think twice if you're armed and capable of responding with an equal measure of lethal violence. If you go to a nightclub with ideas about shooting up the place, you are more likely to do it if you know the other patrons and the staff are all unarmed than you are if you know that each and everyone of them carries a gun.
    2
  10. Daniel Shin: The question wasn't about which country was "more developed". The question was about the number of inventions. An area where Korea was significantly lacking before coming under the rule and culture of the U.S (by extension western European culture). A country being "developed" is not something to brag about in the grand scheme of things, since development is rather relative and only bottles down to how much corporate funds having been invested in the private market if a single country. There was a time when muslim, middle eastern countries were significantly more "developed" than Korea. Yet look at the same muslim countries now. Development comes and goes. Like Empires rise and fall. What matters is the heritage that stands the test of time and survive regardless of relative development. Like inventions that help all of mankind and are being used by all of mankind with the means to.
    2
  11. Daniel Shin: Oh! So NOW you care about "intent" all of a sudden? Well if intent is what matters, then why the hell are you attacking the guns (that is the TOOLS) of the killer, rather than the killer itself? You gun-hating lunatics are so hypocritical and stupid. One minute intent matters, the next minute: intent is irrelevant. Derp, logic? The fact of the matter is: traffic still kills more people every year. I doubt the dead people really care if they die due to traffic or due to getting shot, because they'll still be dead either way. And no, most gun fatalities aren't intentional but accidental. You haven't even bothered to study the statistics that you feebly try to back up your argument with. Pathetic. IF guns are so bad, why doesn't South Korea just abandon every single gun and piece of artillery in the entire country? I'm sure Kim Jong-Un would be delighted. :)
    2
  12. Yuri S: So you're willing to accept the fact that skin tone can drastically vary between human beings of different race, as well as hair texture, hair density, average height and weight, resistance and susceptibility to various diseases, abilities to digest certain types of food (white people can digest dairy productsmore effectively than black people can), facial bone structure and skull shape etc. But suggest that there might also be a slight difference in brain function (and even back it up with the scientific findings in the Bell Curve) and it's all just "crazy"? Hate to break it to you snowflake, but humans ARE different from eachother in terms of race. We've even made discoveries that suggest that black people and white people don't even originate from the same species of hominids. That's right! We've found fossils of hominids in Europe dating back far longer than the supposed homo sapiens of the African continent and their supposed migration across the world and that all humans originate from African hominids. You need to catch up with the times and read more about these recent scientific discoveries (the latest of which happened in 2016) and not just sit content with the "knowledge" that they taught you in grade school. Science updates itself continually. That's what science is about.
    2
  13. Nokcs iku: But tell me, which of those inventions came from South Korea before it got americanized?
    2
  14. JayY1Thousand: Read "The Bell Curve", and abandon this nonsense that race has nothing to do with intelligence. Wealth and education are not sole determining factors in a persons IQ. Asians with far less wealth and far less educational support still outscore westerners on IQ tests. CLEARLY race plays a part in it.
    2
  15. Nabriales: Of course you fucking "sabotage" what you call "proper laws". Why the hell would any american just accept having their constitutional rights taken away? The constitution is clear on this issue and there's no changing it, ever. If you have a problem with the constitutional right to bear arms, then I suggest you leave the U.S. Because the American people are not about to sacrifice their constitutional rights just to make YOU happy.
    2
  16. Greg Johnson: It's a way to measure the skills of deductive reasoning and logic in an individual. It stands to reason that a person exhibiting proficiency at using logic and deductive reasoning during an IQ-test also tends to apply those skills in his or her every day life as well. And since being healthy and successful usually relies on ones ability of logic and deductive reasoning...
    2
  17. Just Music: You seriously think i'm less lethal with a knife? :) That's cute.
    2
  18. DavidProducts: And what makes a person "qualified" to own a weapon? Does being in the police or military make you "qualified"? What do you say to the oppressed and disarmed civilians of Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia where only the police and the military werw allowed to own guns? Were they "qualified"?
    2
  19. Margaret H: No, they don't carry out of "pride". They carry because sometimes self-defense is necessary outside of the home enviroment.
    2
  20. Nabriales: America is the only first world country with freedom that is. Free men don't have to ask their government for permission to own guns and defend themselves. Slaves do.
    2
  21. Just Music: War is necessary sometimes. I'd rather be armed and prepared for it, than unarmed and get completely dominated by the people who are armed.
    2
  22. Daniel Shin: You seriously believe that guns kill more people in the U.S than traffic does? You're not the correct person to lecture anyone about statistics that's for damn sure...
    2
  23. rex i: I saw a movie once where only the police and the military had guns. It was called Schindlers List... Suffice to say that it didn't turn out so well for the unarmed civilians in it.
    1
  24. DavidProducts: "Water is the solution to fire" you say? Try that on burning oil.
    1
  25. Daniel Shin: Laws have never made guns hard to obtain in any country anywhere on the face of the planet. There was a shooting not long ago in my country, where a deranged priest had seduced a young nanny to kill his wife. It took the nanny less than 15 minutes to buy a revolver illegally (in a country with some of the strictest gun laws in the world I might add). And this wasn't some career criminal with plenty of connections with the underworld. This was a young, impressionable woman who had basically grown up as a devout christian and who didn't know ANYBODY in the criminal underworld. If a christian nanny from a small, hick town without any previous criminal connections can just hop on a bus and go to the capital city and get a gun illegally in a country with heavy gun control in less than 15 minutes, exactly how does gun control make it "harder" to get a gun?
    1
  26. Just Music: So? I don't see a problem with criminals getting killed by police.
    1
  27. DrDrae3000: There are no dangerous weapons. Only dangerous men. And a society where only dangerous men are armed (because they usually don't give a shit about laws anyway) will be infinitely more dangerous than a society where good, law abiding citizens are armed as well.
    1
  28. Legendary Saiyajin: So you're saying that "real freedom" is living in a state where the police or the military can just barge into your house and tell you to do all manner of things or even shoot you on the spot and there's not a damn thing you can do about it or even have the rights or the means to defend yourself? Yeah, sounds very "free"...
    1
  29. bigguy283: Uh no. That's the point of a constitution, YOU DON'T CHANGE IT OVER TIME. That's why those laws are called constitutional laws or rights instead of just laws. You can actually thank the constitution for the abolishment of slavery, because it was the constitutional laws and righta that eventually inspired the free thinkers of the U.S that owning other people as property is immoral and UNCONSTITUTIONAL. You may also note that whatever legal protection slave owners had was never constitutional legal protection. Those laws were regular laws, subject to change whereas constitutions do not change but remain the same.
    1
  30. WOLFMAN1469: The police have something called the "10 foot rule". After some research into the matter they discovered that it's physically impossible to draw your weapon, aim and fire at an assailant armed with a knife if the assailant starts out within 10 feet of you. Now, think about all those situations in life when you're 10 feet within complete strangers. Like the street, riding the subway, concert audiences, nightclubs, political rallies and so on. Knife users have ample opportunity to attack their victims practically at a whim. And not even open carry or concealed carry will be able to protect them. It'w great to have a gun on your person. But one must keep in mind that it will only save you against hostile targets at least 10 feet away from you.
    1
  31. Daniel Shin: It doesn't matter if Korea has a thousand year old history. History means squat if your country and culture hasn't invented or produced anything of use for all the inhabitants of the earth. Korea was a pisspoor and insignificant country before the Korea wars and western society moved in and imposed it's research, inventions and culture onto Korea. North Korea refused it and pretty much continue to be a pisspoor, insignificant little rogue state while South Korea blossomed because of it. Modern South Korea doesn't have ANYTHING of value not given to them by the west.
    1
  32. DrDrae3000: Actually, several states in the U.S have stand your ground laws. You don't have to prove that your life was in danger to use a gun in self-defense. In these cases, self-defense even applies to protection of your own property AND constitutional rights. This means that in these states I can shoot a burglar. I don't even have to give a warningshot if I put up signs on my property with "No trespassing" written on them. In fact I can even legally shoot and kill A POLICE OFFICER in such states, if he tries to violate my constitutional rights by force. Which is actually a good thing, because it means that unlike the gun-hating, rights-hating countries that you love so much: the U.S actually acknowledge the fact that just because you have a badge and a gun, it doesn't make you incorruptible. So if you become dirty and start abusing your power as a police officer, the state will not save you if an armed citizen falling victim to your corrupt methods decide to shoot you during an unlawful arrest.
    1