Comments by "Seven Proxies" (@sevenproxies4255) on "Labour Party MP’s Simp for Socialist Riots" video.

  1. "I will use the rights and freedoms you grant me to take away yours" -Every socialist ever
    130
  2. I'll shoot anyone coming near my property with harmful intent. Damn the consequences.
    7
  3.  @XtremeConditions  There is no "tolerance paradox" though. It's just a made up concept used to justify taking away people's freedom to express themselves in a way of their own choosing. In the truly free society, you can express yourself however you feel like while also having your property rights and employment rights protected under the law. And yes, this even extends to so called "incitement to violence". Because at the end of the day, incitement is harmless. It's mere words and nothing else. Words never harmed anyone. Actions do. And if a group of people proceed to do violence based on what the instigator merely SAY, then those people are solely responsible for their actions, and the full might of the law should come down on them like a hammer on an anvil. Nobody is entitled to excuse their actions by saying "Well this person on a soapbox told me to go out and harm minority x". You had the choice when you heard the guy on the soapbox. You chose to just believe him at face value. You chose to do what he told you, even though you knew it was in direct violation of the law and also a violation of the rights of the people you victimized. The idiot on the soapbox is just a ranting idiot. Nobody is obliged or dutybound to listen to him. Therefore it is completely ludicrous to act as if the idiot on the soapbox have committed a "crime" for merely having words come out of their mouths. It's a nothingburger. Hot air with zero capacity to harm anyone. And it's about damn time society grows up and realize this and stop bickering over "fighting words" or "intolerant speech" or "hate speech". Legalize them all, I say. But make damn sure you send in heavily armed police ready to give people a real beating with nightsticks at the very moment anyone steps over the line from merely using words and into illegal action.
    5
  4.  @XtremeConditions  The U.S has made a step in the right direction by having a contitution in place. The reason they can get away with tyranny in Scotland is because they don't have a constitution. Politicians are basically free to fiddle around with any law as they see fit. If they wanted to introduce the death penalty for rightwingets tomorrow, and they have enough representatives to support it, they could do it with impunity. Changing constitutional amendments in the U.S however, requires a supermajority (it's not merely enough to have a majority to see it through). The problem with the U.S right now is that there is a sizeable portion of the establishment and a president who simply choose to ignore the constitution to implement their tyranny. Best case scenario, gun owners will band together with money and sue the government in the supreme court for the Biden administrations anti-constitutional methods. It's a very high likelyhood they'd win so long as the supreme court justices haven't been packed or bought off. Worst case: you basically need armed revolution. Shooting at whatever cops or soldiers the government send to take your guns away. And yes, I realize this would be "illegal violence", but the context differs widely in the sense that the government itself is violating your constitution by trying to take awa your guns. The founding fathers were pretty clear about why there is a 2nd amendment to begin with, and it includes granting the means to the citizens to violently oppose tyrants. Even if the tyrant in question happens to sit in the oval office. The socialists engaging in violence however can't make any legal or constitutionla case for their actions. Now laws or constitutions are broken to violate their rights. The socialist can only try to justify their violence citing ideals about "equality" or "anti-capitalism". But even if they don't like capitalism, their constitutional rights are not being infringed upon by anyone, making their case for violent revolution objectively weaker.
    4
  5.  @Jay-Bee_NUFC  We don't have that right either. I'll gladly go to prison if that's what it takes. The lesson will be taught anyway, mess with my property and people will die.
    3