Comments by "Seven Proxies" (@sevenproxies4255) on "Do I Hate Women?" video.

  1. RubberKidney - OR YOUR DISTANT FATHER WHO DIDN'T GIVE YOU ENOUGH ATTENTION!
    36
  2. bitchimmadog roofgurr: Sorry but there are only two kinds of feminists. The nutjob social justice warriors, and the silent feminist group approving of the nutjob social justice warriors. All feminism is cancer, period.
    3
  3. I knew this would happen.
    1
  4. If there are still any feminist doubters who still think Raff might be a mysogynist, remember this: a real misogynist wouldn't have bothered making a video like this at all. A true misogynist would've just flipped this criticism off since a woman wrote it, reasoning that the opinion of a woman is unimportant and not even worthy adressing.
    1
  5. Scott Burton: ALL feminists are about female superiority. The bullshit about "being for equality" in all brands of feminism is tied to a pretty significant disclaimer. Namely that AAAALL feminists assumes that all women in every society is at a disadvantage (even when they're not). Like the wage gap for instance, which is a proven and debunked myth. A wage gap simply doesnnt exist in any sexist, unwarranted sense. But ALL feminists assumes it does, because their ideological overlords say it does. Nothing will change their opinions, no matter how much proof or statistical surveys you present that logically and scientidically prove thw wage gap to be a myth. So they all run around with this assumption, and at the same time they demand financial and political actions and concessions to remedy this non-existant wage gap. Pretend that the wage gap exists, then these ideas might've been reasonable. Because if a group is proven to be disadvantaged, then granting them certain positive advantages will serve to offset the original disadvantage and create an equilibrium. BUT, what happens when you give a non-disadvantaged group advantages? That's right! They gain an unfair advantage over all others. And ALL feminists agree that this non-existant disadvantage (among several others non-existant disadvantages) exists and that it needs to be adressed by granting women priviliges. The whole "idea" about being "for equality" is nothing but a deception and a front to legitimize giving privilige and power to women (mostly middle- to upper class white women). They're trying to make people think "Hey! Feminists say they are for equality. And equality is nice! Therefore feminis must be nice too!" When in reality, feminists are about as good champions for equality as communists are champions for "fairness".
    1
  6. middle earth/larp/archery: You just proved my point. You "support women" because you buy into a false narrative that women are actually in need or "support", when in reality: they are not.
    1