Comments by "Seven Proxies" (@sevenproxies4255) on "Vlad Ncl" channel.

 @Brihtx If by "lunch table" you mean the white house and CNN then, yeah.
7
@Brihtx Her talking points are identical to theirs though
4
@BlueNorth313 Neither of these are inherent to imperialism. All other ideologies have a history containing all of them.
3
 @PoochieCollins There is nothing wrong with imperialism.
2
It's strange how most women oppose to being allowed to own and carry guns
1
@forest2727 No one said you shouldn't hold the men who do this accountable. But here's the thing: these men will always exist, no matter how many of them you hold accountable. With this knowledge in mind, the only alternative to avoid being subjected to this is taking steps to avoid the situation yourself. So what is more important for you at the end of the day? That you can avoid being victimized, or that the perpetrator is held accountable? Most people will prefer to not get victimized over arguing about who's accountable.
1
@alexb7092 It's not women's fault. But to pretend that women have zero influence over the situation is asinine. Whenever you walk out in public, you risk being subjected to crime or unwanted situations. Unavoidable fact of life. But there are steps the individual can take to minimize risk, and no woman is helped by being told that she has zero means to take any of these steps by feminist activists.
1
 @manasi92 I have never approached a woman in public for these purposes in my entire life. In fact I don't talk to strangers on the street in general. So why should I have to run inside?
1
 @soullessnight6539 It's because women's feelings are irrational and rarely represent measurable reality.
1
 @thirtyfiveoutoffiftycharacters Even if you teach 100 people to respect boundaries, 1 pr 2 of them will ignore the lesson. That's just a fact of life.
1
 @Arstik So I can wear a swastika-shirt in public and should be completely safe and protected?
1
@forest2727 No, but here is the thing: when we tell women to avoid dangerous situations, we don't say that to women who have already been victimized or that it"s their fault for not following our advice. We tell women who haven't yet been victimized so they can hopefully be spared from such incidents in the future. But radical feminists have completely warped the intent behind this advice just so they have another excuse to blame all men for everything. Every self respecting man relish the opportunity to personally punish people who commit sexual assault or harassment, including myself. But we can't be everywhere to stop rapists and creeps all the time, so women must do their part in looking out for themselves too FOR THEIR OWN SAKE, instead of just walking through life being completely passive.
1
 @Kunigunda897 I'm also from northern europe and I have seen it several times... But it's always arab or african immigrants doing it.
1
@forest2727 No man really believes that a man can't control his sexual desires. Every man on planet earth can. The only men who make this claim are rapists. This is the objective truth. Every man on earth is in full control of his actions regardless of how sexually aroused he is. Your clothing is completely irrelevant to the equation. The unfortunate truth is that men exist who willfully and actively commit sexual assaults and you can never tell at first glance if they will or not. So don't let anyone make you believe that we lose control over the way you're dressed. We're always in control. The underlying issue is that some people are scum and will always be scum. Furthermore, the only way to change perceptions is to talk about the issue and correct the incorrect perceptions. If that means I may have to come across as "insensitive" to victims who didn't use amore pro-active approach in protecting themselves, then i'm sorry, I have to be insensitive then. It's either being insensitive or letting the cycle with the same dangerous behaviour continue forever.
1
@BlueNorth313 Nope. And there's nothing you can say to substantiate your claim.
1
@BlueNorth313 If they are inherent to imperalism, then by the same standard of measurement they are inherent to socialism, liberalism, capitalism, monarchy, tribalism and so on. Point is: if everyone is guilty if a thing, it's meaningless to point at a single individual entity for also being guilty of the thing.
1
@333-u9o Good. While education sometimes teaches a lot of skills, sadly it also completely warps your brain ideologically. The most idiot ideas in political history were born in universities and NEVER among the "uneducated masses".
1