Comments by "Seven Proxies" (@sevenproxies4255) on "The Japan Reporter" channel.

  1. 1100
  2. 443
  3. 315
  4. 203
  5. 198
  6. 198
  7. 186
  8. 95
  9. 70
  10. 67
  11. 66
  12. 65
  13. 60
  14. 59
  15. 51
  16. 50
  17. 46
  18. 45
  19. 36
  20. 33
  21. 32
  22. 25
  23. 24
  24. 24
  25. 24
  26. 24
  27. 23
  28. 22
  29. 22
  30. 22
  31. 21
  32. 21
  33. 19
  34. 18
  35. 17
  36. 17
  37. 16
  38. 15
  39. 14
  40. 13
  41. 13
  42. 12
  43. 11
  44. 10
  45. 10
  46. 10
  47. 10
  48. 10
  49. 10
  50. 9
  51. 9
  52. 9
  53. 9
  54. 9
  55. 8
  56. 8
  57. One thing to note about the "horrors of declining birth rates". Can anyone name a single country that has been destroyed or dissolved and ceased to exist as a result of declining birth rates? Declining birth rates can cause problems for a society. Potentially quite macabre ones (like senior citizens not being able to live off pensions and social services because the working population is simply too small to support them). So worst case scenario, the elderly and infirm might perish in large numbers as a result. And that would certainly be a terrible result for sure. But will it destroy a country? Personally I don't think so. The elderly would perish, their property would be inherited by the younger generations and the country and the economy would eventually adapt and balance itself to the new population levels accordingly. It would of course be ideal to avoid such a scenario, but there are some key questions that should be asked about it too. Namely: how sustainable is it, long term to structure a society like a giant pyramid scheme that essentially requires ever increasing birth rates to financially support an ever increasing group of elderly retired citizens? Can any society really do this long term without courting disaster? Can out planet and natural resources support such a development? Despite our best intentions, we have to adress the issue at some point that we all live with a finite number of resources, yet governments do nothing to ensure that populations stay at levels adapted to this finite number. All of them just push for us to grow ever more numerous, because it leads to short term wealth gains for a select few people. It is a very irresponsible policy that has been made a norm.
    8
  58. 8
  59. 8
  60. 7
  61. 7
  62. 7
  63. 7
  64. 7
  65. 7
  66. 7
  67. 7
  68. 6
  69. 6
  70. 6
  71. 6
  72. 6
  73. 6
  74. 6
  75. 5
  76. 5
  77. 5
  78. 5
  79. 5
  80. 5
  81. 4
  82. 4
  83. 4
  84. 4
  85. 4
  86. 4
  87. 4
  88. 4
  89. 4
  90. 3
  91. 3
  92. 3
  93. 3
  94. 3
  95. 3
  96. 3
  97. 3
  98. 3
  99. 3
  100. 3
  101. 3
  102. 3
  103. 3
  104. 3
  105. 3
  106. 3
  107. 3
  108. 2
  109. 2
  110. 2
  111. 2
  112. 2
  113. 2
  114. 2
  115. 2
  116. 2
  117. 2
  118. 2
  119. 2
  120. 2
  121. 2
  122. 2
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. 1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1