Comments by "Seven Proxies" (@sevenproxies4255) on "BANNED BY FACEBOOK & INSTAGRAM" video.

Bans 100 conservatives. "Oh but we're not politically biased. We also banned that ONE left-wing extremist" 😇
690
@pepcozz8519 : Not really. Both on facebook and twitter, left-wing extremists all encourage actual terrorist attacks against people who disagree with their views. Yet they're never banned for it. While conservatives only raise issues like the problems of mass immigration and the lies and bias of the mainstream media. And they always banned for it.
23
@NugicusStreetPhotography : Did it ever occur to you that the mainstream media spread fake news all the time? Why is CNN never getting banned and deplatformed when they post lies and are caught lying? Also I fail to see the severity of "racist posts" (not that conservatives really post any racism, but still) when the left not only engage in racism themselves (actively targeting white people for instance) but even encourage actual terrorist attacks on social media and NEVER get banned for it. One rule for me and one rule for thee?
17
@pepcozz8519 : Tell me, why does both facebook and twitter still have loads of antifa-pages where they actively call for violent action against political opponents? Why are they left to remain? Why do people get to post "kill all white people" without facing any reprecussions from facebook or twitter whatsoever? According to both facebook and twitter: death threats, racism and incitement to violence both violate their terms of service. Yet left wingers are practically never banned for it.
7
@pepcozz8519 : Why shouldn't I focus on those who aren't banned? How come they can ban even the most centrist and rational conservatives at the speed of light, but take forever to ban antifa pages calling for violence and terror? Because everyone working at twitter and facebook are friends of antifa. Several are even members of antifa. That much is evident.
4
@pepcozz8519 If climate change is real, then why do you worry about people disagreeing with climate change on social media to the point where they have to be actively censored from disagreeing? If climate change = reality, then no amount of disagreement could possibly change that reality. So what are you lefty cucks so scared of?
3
@pepcozz8519 : Yeah, cause criticizing anyone jewish is "verboten" nowadays. Isn't that wonderful? No member of any minority shall ever be criticized for ANYTHING again! Isn't that a wonderful utopian ideal to strive for? :D
2
@pepcozz8519 : I've read several in fact. And I've also worked for several years in labour unions and for workers rights. So i'm fairly confident that my knowledge about the issue is far greater than yours. But by all means, please do share your theory of how the native working class "benefits" from the wage dumps that always result from mass immigration. I'm all ears.
2
@killboi207 : No, "xeno" mean "stranger" or "foreign". You can be xenophobic towards your own countrymen merely on the basis that they are from a different town than you.
2
@pepcozz8519 : Those people aren't helped either. I live in a country that used to have high welfare standards for old and sick people. But that standard has severely declined due to mass migration. Because when you import hundreds of thousands of people from third world countries with low IQ's and no reading or writing skills, they don't instantly become new taxpayers. They become needy of social welfare themselves. That money has to come from somewhere, so the pro-immigrant governments do what they have done in my country: they dip into the funds that used to go to old and sick people in need, so old and sick people are left with reduced or even no aid whatsoever. So tell me, why should the working class, and the old and the sick be in favor of mass migration? They have no rational reason whatsoever to be in favor of mass migration. Yet you seem to think that people "should" welcome the migrants with open arms.
2
@pepcozz8519 : Yes we do have a better option. Hungary has put one in place as we speak: incentivize natives to start their own families. Current western societies have done nothing but disincentivize people from having families since any familyman or woman is severely penalized in their careers for not staying single and available for extreme quantities of overtime work. And as I already said: there is no such thing as a "labour shortage" in the western world because every single white, western country has a native population with involuntary unemployment. (that is people without jobs who would like to have a job). Immigration should only ever be allowed when the involuntary unemployment rate is ZERO, and the industries still require more workers. The needs and rights of natives should ALWAYS come before whatever needs and rights that immigrants want satisfied.
2
@NugicusStreetPhotography : So what if someone claimed that a shooting was a hoax? Did anyone die or get injured because they heard a hoax accusation? No? Then what did happen? Did someone get "offended"? Since when does anybody ever had the right to "not feel offended"?
2
@NugicusStreetPhotography : So the dutch and the french negative sentiments towards germans as their countries were being invaded by Hitlers forces was... "racist"? :) They should've just accepted the invasion and repeated the mantra #NotAllGermans to themselves?
2
@killboi207 : No. Study some fucking greek you ignoramus, and then maybe it'll dawn on you. No I don't get paid to slap you imbecilles around. I do it out of charity.
2
Agreed. Unless conservatives start getting physical with their opposition, then their entire ideological group is finished. There is no talking, reasoning or bargaining with the left-wing establishment. Only bullets planted in heads will see change.
2
@NugicusStreetPhotography : No it's not. Xenophobia is the dislike, fear or hatred of strangers. Racism is a belief in the division of mankind into different races. The dutch and the french were pretty damn XENOPHOBIC towards the germans back during WWII. But that doesn't mean that they were RACIST towards germans you fucking idiot.
1
@pepcozz8519 : Tell me, if we're "dying off" and there's "too few of us to do the necessary jobs"... Then how come there are WHITE unemployed people in both Europe and the U.S? If the notion that there's a "workforce shortage" in Europe and the U.S was true, then there shouldn't exist any involuntary unemployed white people in the west at all now should it? The only reason why these masses of immigrants are being imported is because the wealthy elite doesn't want to pay decent wages to white labourers. They want to create a desperate working class through mass immigration, where already struggling working class natives are forced to compete with migrants for the dwindling jobs. And that is the ONLY reason that mass immigration is being advocated. The idea that there's a "workforce shortage" in the west is the biggest piece of fake news in modern times.
1
@morenitomoreno1282 : Right wingers don't believe "the free market" is the end-all-be-all answer to all issues. Right wingers also believe in constitutional rights. If any actor (free market actor or otherwise) trample on the constitutional rights of individuals, then that is one of few instances where the government really should step in and do something to stop it.
1
@morenitomoreno1282 The issue is whether you follow the exact legal text of the 1st amendment or if you seek to follow the spirit of it. The spirit is that a free citizen should be able to express their views if they like, without intervention or censure from ANYONE (including "private" corporations, although neither facebook, twitter or youtube are private corporations since they have all accepted government subsidies in their businesses, and thus the government has every right to exert control over them) Also, due to the fact that all the news outlets use these platforms for political purposes and influencing elections, the government would be entirely in the right to step in and nationalize them or turn them into public utilities because refusing to exert control over private companies that directly influence election results is the same thing as handing over your national sovreignty. Constitutionally speaking: sovreignty will always take priority over the "rights" of private entities to threaten your national sovreignty. The conservative position is that everyone should respect everyone elses constitutional rights. That includes companies and does not "just" apply to the government.
1