Comments by "lovly 2cu" (@lovly2cu725) on "Colorado Supreme Court facing threats after Trump's ballot removal" video.

  1. šŸ¤£SAYS WHO? WHERE WAS HE CHARGED?
    3
  2. THE STATE IS BLUE. LOOK WHAT THEY DID TO TINA PETERS
    3
  3. NOT ACCUSED, NOT TRIED
    2
  4. šŸ¤£šŸ¤£šŸ¤£šŸ¤£šŸ¤£šŸ¤£ OK šŸ¤” EXPLAIN ALL THE "BREAKS" HE GOT. SO YOU DONT BELIEVE IN THE CONSTITUTION? HE HASNT BEEN TRIED YET & DO NOT PASS GO> STRAIGHT TO JAIL. HOW ABOUT THAT HAPPENS 2 U?
    2
  5. IT WILL BE OVERTURNED. THEY SAID THEY WOULD NOT COUNT WRITE INS
    2
  6. HE HAS NO CHARGES OF IT EITHER.
    2
  7. SOWN. SEWN IS WHAT U DO TO FABRIC
    2
  8. THE STATE IS BLUE
    2
  9. THATS THE PLAN
    2
  10. HAS HE BEEN CHARGED? THAT HAS TO COME 1ST
    1
  11. COULD U PLEASE PROVIDE A LINK FOR THE CHARGES?
    1
  12. U CAN IF YOU WANT TO CONTROL & NO ONE CHALLENGES THAT. SO THAT NEVER HAPPENED IN HISTORY B4? LIKE MAYBE 1930S
    1
  13. COMING TO 15 OTHER STATES. DID YOU CHECK THE MAP?
    1
  14. AND UR TAX $ ARE PAYING FOR THE POLICE ET AL TO COME TO THE HOUSEĀ @MysidianRabiteĀ 
    1
  15. SAID A DEMOCRAT
    1
  16. AT LEAST VOTED OUT
    1
  17. ARM CHAIR šŸ¤” LAWYER
    1
  18. THEY DO COME UP FOR ELECTION
    1
  19. CHARGED FIRST, THEN TRIED, THEN CONVICTED, YES
    1
  20. IT ISNT THE FBI'S GIG TO PROTECT THEM, IT IS THE US MARSHALS
    1
  21. AND BE BORN A US CITIZEN
    1
  22. NO KIDDING. ARM CHAIR LAWYERS. HASNT READ THE DOCUMENT NOR THE CHARGES. OOPS THERE ARE NO CHARGES
    1
  23. COLORADO SAID THEY WOULDNT ACCEPT IT
    1
  24. SHE IS A US REP NOT A CO STATE REP. KNOW THE DIFFERENCE. SO BOEBERTS HUBS SLAPPING HER KID AROUND IS OK THEN W U? THATS Y SHE FILED
    1
  25. SO BLAME HER & CALL HER NAMES
    1
  26. OR CHARGED, YET THEY DECIDED HE IS WITHOUT DUE PROCESS
    1
  27. COLORADO SAID THEY WOULD BE INVALID. ALSO ILLEGAL. 16 STATES ARE TRYING THIS
    1
  28. UH NO. WHERE DOES IT SAY THAT?
    1
  29. HELLO BOTSWANA
    1
  30. OF COURSE, THEY INTEND U 2 CHALLENGE IT. ISNT THAT HOW THINGS STARTED IN THE 1930S IN EUROPE?
    1
  31. HE WASNT CHARGED
    1
  32. QUITE A FEW COMMENTERS HERE DO, IT SEEMS
    1
  33. AND ARM CHAIR LAWYERS ARE OK WITH THAT, EXCEPT IF IT HAPPENS 2 THEM.
    1
  34. ? GRAMMAR
    1
  35. OR CHARGED
    1
  36. MORE RECENTLY PLEASEĀ @caseylance3985Ā 
    1
  37. CONSIDER THE TOPIC FOR THE ANSWER OF UR QUESTION, ITS ABOUT JUDICIAL UNLESS U WERE HOPING ITS ABOUT 45Ā @emilyalice1Ā 
    1
  38. IRISH MAFIA AT 1600
    1
  39. @CASEYLANCE3985 IS CORRECT, UNFORTUNATELY @LEONARDDODAKIMCHI
    1
  40. WHAT DO U RECOMMEND?Ā @SandmanAlpha4Ā 
    1
  41. NO & THE POPULAR VOTE DOESNT COUNT. ITS THE ELECTORAL VOTE THAT COUNTS. THE FOUNDERS WERE SMART TO DO THAT, OTHERWISE CALIFORNIA & NEW YORK WOULD PICK THE POTUS EVERY TIME. IS THAT THE BEST ARGUMENT U GOT?
    1
  42. ON PUR POSE. ITS THE PLAN SINCE 2009
    1
  43. AND IT ISNT THEIR GIG TO INTERPRET THAT ARTICLE
    1
  44. YOU ROCK
    1
  45. NOT THE FBI FOR SCOTUS PROTECTION, IS JOE>GARLAND>DOJ>MARSHALS
    1
  46. WHEN THEY DONT KNOW WHAT HE DID PRIOR, LIKE U. HE IS A BIG FKN DEAL IN NYC SINCE THE 1970S, BUT U WOULDNT KNOW THAT IN LOUISIANA
    1
  47. ?
    1
  48. ITS A TEAM SPORT
    1
  49. AND HE WASNT EVER CHARGED FOR THAT.
    1
  50. AND TRUMP WASNT CHARGED BY SMITH OR ANYONE ELSE, YET THEY SAY HE IS GUILTY @PEDRONOA1973
    1
  51. PPL JUST LIKE TO TWIST THINGS FOR CONVENIENCEĀ @stephenkingsley5815Ā 
    1
  52. BLUE BANANAS
    1
  53. THEY DONT HAVE TO TAKE IT
    1
  54. DID U TELL JOJO
    1
  55. BC THEIR BOSS TOLD THEM NO
    1
  56. SUPREME COURT OF WHAT? COLORADO? NO THEY DIDNT. THEY FLOATED IT TIL 1/4
    1
  57. TRUCKERS R
    1
  58. WHAT ABOUT THE OTHER 15 STATES?
    1
  59. SO NOT CHARGING HIM, NOT HAVING A TRIAL & CONVICTING SOMEONE IS OK WITH YOU? THEN IT COULD APPLY 2 U. HAVE YOU READ ANY OF THE CONSTITUTION? HOW ABOUT THE FACT THAT SCOTUS DECIDES THIS NOT A STATE? WOW JUST WOW šŸ¤”
    1
  60. READ THE COMMENT FROM @DONALDMOORE6763 & ED U CATE UR SELF
    1
  61. WHO NEVER LOOKED SO COULD SAY HE NEVER SAW ANYTHING
    1
  62. DID U READ THRU THE COMMENTS? ITS AMAZING
    1
  63. AND IT ISNT THEIR GIG, ITS SCOTUS' GIG NOT THE STATE
    1
  64. VERY & YET THEY BENEFIT AS POTUS
    1
  65. SO U DONT KNOW HE HASNT BEEN CHARGED WITH THIS?
    1
  66. THERE IS A TINY THING CALLED CHARGES, A TRIAL, BEING FOUND GUILTY B4 U GET PUNISHED 4 WHAT U DID.
    1
  67. COLORADO STAYED IT TIL 1/4 SO IT CAN BE APPEALED, SKIP.
    1
  68. SMH
    1
  69. WE WILL VOTE. KEEP VOTING BLUE. SO U MUST LIKE ALL THE PRICES, THEN, HUH?
    1
  70. THEY HAVE SINCE 2009 šŸ˜‰šŸ˜‰WINK
    1
  71. SO DO SOMETHING. MESSAGE YOUR STATE REPS & SENATORS. LOOK UP THESE 4 JUDGES WHEN THEY COME UP FOR ELECTION
    1
  72. HE ISNT A STATE SENATOR, HE IS A US SENATOR FROM NY & CURRENT SENATE LEADER
    1
  73. US SENATOR NOT STATE SENATOR LIKE HE POSTED. THANXĀ @diegoyeahgallardo7375Ā 
    1
  74. ALL 7 JUSTICES ARE DEMS. IT IS NOW A BLUE STATE. ITS ABOUT CONTROL FOR THE LAST 4 YEARS.. 16 STATES ARE TRYING TO DO THIS.
    1
  75. THATS SARCASM RIGHT?
    1
  76. AND THAT IMPACTS THEIR VOTEĀ @PaulVega-y9vĀ 
    1
  77. NO THEY SAID THEY WONT COUNT/A;LLOW WRITE IN SKIP. PPL NEED TO B UP ON ALL B4 THEY LECTURE SOMEINE ELSEĀ @PaulVega-y9vĀ 
    1
  78. THEY CITED HE WAS GUILTY OF SOMETHING THAT HE WASNT CHARGED WITH NOR TRIED ON. THERE WAS NO DUE PROCESS SO THAT ALONE IS UNCONSTITUTIONALĀ @johnsnow94Ā 
    1
  79. SO IS TDSĀ @tititigabu8200Ā 
    1
  80. US NOT STATE, BESIDES THERE WERE NO CHARGES RU SELF TAUGHT?Ā @opinionatedpossum1945Ā 
    1
  81. MIKE LEE-GOOD & MITT ROMNEY-DEM ARE 2 US SENATORS. THEY NEED TO CONTACT THEIR CO STATE SENATORS
    1
  82. I UNDERSTAND COURTS IN COLORADO ARE VOTED IN OR OUT. ALL 7 ARE DEMS
    1
  83. ALL 7 ARE DEMS. ONE WROTE A SCATHING REPLY
    1
  84. NO SOUP 4 U
    1
  85. HE DIDNT LOSE THE 1ST TIME NOR THE 2ND TIME. CLEARLY U R SHEEPLE U WATCH MSM INCLUDING FOX & NEWS MAX..
    1
  86. HE WASNT CHARGED NOR TRIED, YET THEY SAID HE WAS. UN CON STIT UTIONAL NO MATTER HOW U SLICE IT
    1
  87. WE DO KNOW 45 REQUESTED & NANCY IS IN CHARGE OF THAT. THE THEN CHIEF OF POLICE DID AN INTERVIEW WITH TUCKER A FEW MONTHS AGO. MAYBE THAT WOULD HELP U IF U SAW IT
    1
  88. WHAT ELECTION?
    1
  89. 16 STATES PENDING
    1
  90. SOWN. NOT SEWN, WHICH IS WHAT YOU DO TO FABRIC. SO DID YOU READ THAT ARTICLE? IT DOESNT SAY PRESIDENTS GOOD IM GLAD THE PRESIDENCY HAS NO ROOM FOR INSURRECTIONISTS & EVEN JACK SMITH IS SMART ENUF THAT HE DIDNT CHARGE THAT, SO HOW DOES A STATE(NOT SCOTUS)* NOT* CHARGE HIM, NOT TRY HIM & NOT CONVICT HIM, YET SAY HE COMMITTED THIS ACT, SKIP? THATS ILLEGAL
    1
  91. ARMCHAIR LAWYERS & DONT READ THE ARTICLE OR THE CONSTITUTION WHEN IT APPLIES 2 SUM 1 THEY DONT LIKEĀ @robertallred4515Ā 
    1
  92. ARE U IN COLORADO? WHO IS THE WE?Ā @ChumpsdookiediaperĀ 
    1
  93. SO EXPLAIN WHEN HE WAS CHARGED WITH THAT? ILL WAIT Ā @ChumpsdookiediaperĀ 
    1
  94. ARE THEY? ITS A BLUE STATE
    1
  95. šŸ¤£GO BACK TO SLEEP
    1
  96. SUPREME IN THE STATE IS OVER OTHER STATE JUDGES. SCOTUS IS OVER EVERYONE
    1
  97. COULD U PLEASE PROVIDE A LINK FOR THE CHARGES?
    1
  98. WHO & WHAT
    1
  99. šŸ¤”
    1
  100. šŸ¤”
    1
  101. THANKS FOR USING YOUR THOUGHT PROCESS
    1
  102. YIOU DIDNT UNDERSTAND THE COMMENT ABOVE THAT YOU REPLIED 2Ā @emilyalice1Ā  OR IT WAS A BAD ATT EMPT AT SAR CASM
    1
  103. NEWSFLASH: THEY ALWAYS CHECK BALLOTS
    1
  104. UH YEAH IT DOES. YOU BETTER PRINT LEGIBLY 1ST NAME MIDDLE INITIAL LAST NAME. WRITE INS ARE LOOKED AT BY HAND. IF IT CANT BE READ, NO MIDDLE INITIAL OR ANY STRAY MARKS IT GETS TOSSED. I LEARNED A LOT WORKING THE AUDIT IN AZ
    1
  105. DONT POST FALSE HOODS BC THATS WHAT U THINK THE LAW SHOULD E.
    1
  106. AND I SALUTE THAT
    1
  107. šŸ¤”BUT IF YOU GET THROWN IN JAIL FOR NOTHING YOU WOULD MELT
    1