Comments by "Edward McLaughlin" (@edwardmclaughlin7935) on "China's Second Fatal Mistake In 100 Years | Shocking Insight" video.

  1. shashakeeleh It's paraphrased yes; but there is no difference in the essential point.
    1
  2.  @shashakeeleh5468  Mark phrases it in a different form from the original while meaning the same thing - that's paraphrasing in my book. Tell me how this is not so.
    1
  3.  @shashakeeleh5468  'Look it up'. The sound of someone who doesn't have anything to back up what they've said; realise they're wrong and haven't the decency to hold up their hands to admit it; and scuttle off to spout bollocks elsewhere.
    1
  4.  @shashakeeleh5468  Same no answer.
    1
  5.  @shashakeeleh5468  The statement in the video means exactly the same as the original. Prove me wrong why don't you?
    1
  6.  @shashakeeleh5468  I've done all my research, so much so that I have shown you to be wind and piss.
    1
  7.  @shashakeeleh5468  Like I said: wind and piss.
    1
  8.  @shashakeeleh5468  Done it mate. Told you but you seem somehow unable to come to terms with reality.
    1
  9. Those bar chart legends are funny. Bitcoin gets to be coloured gold while gold gets coloured, well, not gold! I'm certainly not hanging-on to fiat with all of its criminal debasement.  Also, if indeed China were lining up to be the provider of a new reserve currency backed up by gold, how exactly would that 'back-up' operate? I shouldn't think there will be the option available for me to be the bearer of my digital yuan and demand my sum of physical gold. So how would it not just be a digital fiat, in which my savings can be debased at the keyboard?
    1