Comments by "Edward McLaughlin" (@edwardmclaughlin7935) on "The Spectator" channel.

  1. 3
  2. 2
  3. 2
  4. 2
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. Sir Mark Walport seems to be fully behind the move to have the state jab every arm in the land, multiple times. His 'nothing sinister going on here' has itself a sinister ring to it. His claim that the mRNA treatments for which no long-term effects can be available in this short term deployment; can be regarded as every bit as wholesome as the polio or the TB vaccinations we all know to have been safe; less than convincing. (Safe, who knows yet, maybe because they were actual vaccines and not modifications to our RNA?) His assurance of the ability of the jabs, to stop the passing of infection, is contrary to previous information from ministers and advisers that in fact the jabs do not stop people becoming infected, nor do they stop that infection being passed to others - their saving grace being that they alleviate symptoms and can curtail the onset of serious illness. If, as he states, almost 90% of adults have been jabbed at least once, then how is it that we are not just totally in the clear now, instead of being held in this doom-narrative grip? What percentage of cover are we to aim for? How can he be sure that in fact the jabs are the sole reason for our improved ratio between 'cases' and hospitalisations? Have our abilities to develop natural herd immunity been reduced to zero? The 'India' or 'Delta' variant as it became known, has turned out to be, as he must surely be aware, nothing of concern. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtOu7jx3snQ Meanwhile, the economy that feeds all our kids and pays Sir Mark's salary, is being slow-bled by the day; it's workers thrown onto state dependency.
    1
  24. 1
  25. Good to see Prof' Mearsheimer being given a platform to speak in the established media. Across the alternative scene he has from the outset been a central source of truth regarding the origins of the Ukraine conflict, offering much to counter the tub-thumping, Russophobic memery that generally prevails in the UK on this crucial issue. He honestly admits that he is flummoxed by Trump's antics. Anyone who, at this stage, claims they have a sure grasp of Trump's direction, is either a fool or a manipulator. There are those who are so desperately in need of some antidote to the nonsense of the Biden administration, that they hang on to every Trump move and read it as salvation. This faith stands little chance of being rewarded. When the Trump ego comes up against the hard rock of the Russian predicament, things could become very dangerous. Russia's predicament then and the problem we all now face, is that it has to reach that point at which it feels once again that it has scotched permanently the project that seeks to dismantle its state and to wrest control over the Russian land-mass along with its globally important resources; thereafter to direct aggression toward its other imagined nemesis, China. Whatever Trump promises to the Russians, whatever deals he might propose, they know he is, with all his flamboyant gesture, just one more US President - they come and they go, while in their supposed exclusion, the Nulands/Blinkens/Sullivans etc who brought us to this impasse, remain dedicated to their mission, assiduously preparing for the next phase.
    1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. Interesting that The Spectator just keeps on backing the doom-narrative. Two years of failing to report on the plandemic and who did the planning. Total Spectator acquiescence throughout the entire lockdown process by which the economies that feed us are torn-down 'because covid'. At the same time, total failure to inform readers of the antics of the Bank of England and The Fed' etc; with their unprecedented dilution of respective currencies, so that wages, savings and pensions are in effect re-allocated in the biggest transfer of wealth in history. Now labelled 'borrowing and spending due to covid'. Borrowed from where? Borrowed in order to do what to a virus? - that turns out to be so lethal that our 95 year-old Queen cracks-on with it. And so the trolley rattles onto the next 'crisis'. Every word on the war in Ukraine is given as though the Russians are the unquestioned aggressors. Not a single mention of the relentless march by NATO and the EU right up to Russia's front door; building bases and siting missiles to the repeated reasoned protest from Putin. If we want unthinking propaganda we can simply go to the BBC. We want responsible, independent reporting on these crucial issues and it has been patently absent here at the Spectator, right from the inception of what increasingly identifies as our current period of concerted, global deceit. One can only place The Spectator as being firmly part of that deceit. For anyone interested in what is actually being played-out in Ukraine, here are a couple of links - one from a former US Army Colonel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6mw9U62ZJU ...and one from a senior US academic https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnwRBH5jGvY
    1
  35. "People are scared...they're kind of feeling their way" Scared of what? Thirty somethings all edgy after two years, wringing their hands over a virus that the 95 year old Queen batted off in a couple of days? How miraculous are the 'vaccines' that leave these people scared? What is wrong with you people? "Great cities have survived far worse than this...". "It's just silly to think that an event like covid would take London to its knees" Never have great cities been faced with the events of the last two years. For the first time ever, those charged with looking after the interests of the public, have chosen instead to throw in their lot with the scheme to destroy the economy that feeds us all. 'Covid' was never capable of taking London to its knees - the criminal lockdowns floored it. Businesses were prohibited from opening their doors to customers for extended periods. When they were allowed to re-open, we had the ridiculous pantomime of barcodes and the taking of people's temperature as they strolled in for a pint or a coffee "..put your mask on until you are seated" and all that utter bollocks. Now two years in...'people are scared'. Pathetic bedwetters. Over that whole period, in the background, the Bank of England has been playing its part of debasing the pound so that people's wages, savings and pensions are taken away from them by the stealthiest tax: the money printing and inflation. Never a word of this in the Spectator. Why? The 'cost of living' is not going up. The pound is going down. Why does the Spectator never delve into this, the biggest transfer of wealth in history?
    1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1