Comments by "Edward McLaughlin" (@edwardmclaughlin7935) on "Trevor Phillips and Rod Liddle: What will vaccine passports mean? | SpectatorTV" video.

  1. So, Rod Liddle reckons it's all in order that I shouldn't be able to go into a pub, because I make the judgement that I don't need a 'vaccine' for a virus that has a better than 99.8% survival rate?
    80
  2.  @kaiserchief9319  Don't know about any of that. All I can say is he looks like he's going downhill fast lately. People living in shop doorways looking after themselves better.
    6
  3.  @vindaloovince2194  Wow that's a good job the prop bomb has done on you mate. Firstly, the mutation thing is way overplayed. Flu', a different virus, is infamous for its propensity to mutate. Corona not so. Further: any 'mutation' is cut down by a shorter period of circulation; enabled by a prolonged period such as lockdown is designed to assure.
    5
  4.  @adriang2053  How do any of us know what level flu is at right now? What is the basis of your figures?
    4
  5.  @adriang2053  Fantastic news! So now all we need to do is lockdown every year and we all get to live forever!
    4
  6.  @adriang2053  But PHE stated that from Oct 8 the flu figure would be rolled into the covid figure.
    3
  7.  @adriang2053  If it were just Carl Vernon saying it you might have a point. However, it is Carl Vernon showing the actual report (did you even watch it?) from Public Health England - now, mysteriously no longer available. It might of course just be a hologram or CGI of course.
    3
  8.  @adriang2053  Adrian, I supplied that to you or one of your 77 colleagues recently. You're slipping. Long watch eh?
    2
  9.  @adriang2053  Which link?
    1
  10.  @adriang2053  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdCM3DLZ4B0&t=24s
    1
  11.  @adriang2053  So still no response to the fact that there is proof that PHE issued the statement then? Neglect is not 'seeing-off'.
    1
  12.  @adriang2053  Debunked how? It is there as a stated fact from source.
    1
  13.  @adriang2053  Therefore, the document which was formerly published regarding flu is no longer available on its own? Why not just do one report that covers everything? So easy.
    1
  14.  @adriang2053  Fact remains: the report and of course the statistics within that report, refer not to flu and to covid but to the pair combined. Why would that be?
    1
  15.  @adriang2053  Incorrect, as in, not how you want it to be viewed.
    1
  16.  @adriang2053  Give nothing up. It's a stitch up like so much else with the corona scam.
    1
  17.  @spearmint47  I disagree. An ebola or bubonic plague carrier would very much have to be strictly quarantined for the good of the wider society. SARS Covid -2 is not in the same league. It doesn't even play the same sport.
    1
  18.  @adriang2053  I think you mean 'hypocritical' perhaps? Where did you get the idea that I had no interest in, or feeling of responsibility towards, the people around me? Also, what conspiracy do you have in mind? Would be sort of in order to know what I'm supposed to be theorising about that's all.
    1
  19.  @adriang2053  Not with you there. Muted what?
    1
  20.  @adriang2053  Please remind me. What spelling error? Nice to see you back on watch btw.
    1