Comments by "Edward McLaughlin" (@edwardmclaughlin7935) on "" video.

Well, it's good to listen to new voices so as to gain a wider view. I have to say I wouldn't rush back to this one. His view is at best partial and in some passages positively confused. He bemoans 'conspiracy theory' at an early stage; then later describes the resort of people to alternatives to the propaganda of establishment sources. At whose behest and to what end does he think that propaganda is put together and distributed? Does this all happen in a transparent and open manner? The Fed' that he holds in such esteem was from its very design and inception, the result of the meetings of a small coterie of men who gathered in secrecy in order to gain power over others. Its operation is carried-on in that same way. How is the word 'conspiracy' held in such ridicule as a descriptor of such? As for gold and it being for war: maybe, but it runs out very quickly and then, as history repeatedly has shown, the funny money machine gets cranked-up. Gold is high ground in a flood.
5