Comments by "Edward McLaughlin" (@edwardmclaughlin7935) on "John Anderson Media" channel.

  1. It was a very simple arrangement: I trusted people who hadn't lied to me previously. Then March 2020 came along.
    33
  2. A shift of such huge magnitude - getting most of the world's economies to stop dead - needed a great deal of meticulous planning over a long time. The break, not just in trade but over the whole of society, should not be thought of in the past tense; its effects are ongoing and the damage mounts. The imposition of lockdown measures was not a reaction to events; it was in fact the initiatory move in a concerted programme, executed by a very few people in crucial positions. "Lenin understood that it isn't your numbers that matter. It isn't you popular support that matters. You just paralyse the country [in this case, many countries] by occupying the key positions; and then you take over." (Prof' Donald Rayfield) The evidence grows daily, that points to the reality that the lockdowns were imposed not as a means of saving lives; because, patently, they do not. It follows then, that there must be another very strong motivation that made people in positions of power, impose strictures which they knew would be so damaging. Whatever could be worth such radical action and why did they feel the need to keep the truth from the people whose lives are affected so drastically?
    30
  3. Nine days left to save freedom. After that it's Komrad Kamala with all her hatred.
    23
  4. I'm a huge fan of both these men - subscribed to both their YT channels. Massively let down by this interview. We're 20 months into the lockdowns that continue strangling the economies that support Western Civilisation. We are in the grip of leaders who signal to us daily, that they are to introduce ever more measures to restrict our freedoms due to some new, spurious data from the narrow band of advisers who form 'the science'. Both jabbed and both seemingly enamoured of the idea that was dangled before the public prior to the introduction of the jab programme, that we had at last found 'light at the end of the tunnel'. Almost a year now we've had people jabbed (as many as 90% of adults in UK is reported, but who is to really know?) and where are we at with the tunnel? Dr Peterson's recent tirade at the Canadian authorities' insatiable desire for more imposition upon liberties indicates that he knows something is not right. He states that he has acted in all faith and decency in having the jab, only to find that the pursuit is not called off, they just keep piling-in with more demands/restrictions. Mr Anderson seems somewhat more at ease with how the Australian politicians have dealt with things, yet look at how they are ending up. Just two years ago they were an open and successful part of the world stage with a sound economy which included a great tourist trade - half the world's youth wanted to 'take a year out and backpack'. Where is all that now and do you really think the jabs are going to do anything to put things right? Are neither of these men looking at what is going on in tandem with all of this, in the financial world and in the machinations of organisations like the WEF, who by uncanny coincidence have welcomed our current situation as 'a great opportunity'? Do they have no suspicion at all when the massed ranks of the MSM and almost every western government agency sings from the same song sheet and every page has on it the words 'Vaccine vaccine vaccine'?
    21
  5.  @Vroomfondle1066  It's actually, precisely what happened. By design and to an end.
    14
  6. Millions of years of the development of human natural immunity totally discounted by two of the greatest social commentators of our day. Persuaded by a bunch of immaculately suited barrow-boys, to put their trust in the jab. Dear God help us.
    8
  7. Would love to hear the full discussion. Went to John's website but unable to find mention of Melanie.
    7
  8. Well, thanks to a very few astute and brave people such as Douglas Murray, we know what's being done to us. The question now must be: what can and should we do about it?
    6
  9. Niall Ferguson is a bit too arch for our own good here perhaps. It's rather more important to me to look at what what is at stake here for the future of my children, than to make light of Boris's manoeuvring. We have for the first time in over four decades, seen a resistance to the federalist ratchet that is the EU project. We are witnessing its being crushed by the elite, aided by the media and the chattering classes. This is by far the most dangerous time that Britain has lived through. Neither of our 20th century wars did for us, but this one looks likely to succeed. We are about to be offered the choice between a narrow range of EU-phile parties who have not the slightest intention of letting us leave the grip of the EU. The Tory Party and all of Boris's tub-thumping, is included in that range. Boris has been put in place to Get Brexit Done-In.
    6
  10. "Ideas are much more dangerous than bullets. Why would I allow people to have their own ideas?" Josef Stalin.
    5
  11. Putin is in touch with the reality of NATO's continual march towards the Russian border.
    4
  12. "... I mean, it's 300 billion over 30 years, so that's no a lot of money..." Yes but what about the 'not a lot of money they spent the previous year; and the 'not a lot of money' they will spend next year?
    4
  13. My mate smashed his Kawasaki into the side of a car. It didn't kill him but he's much impaired.
    3
  14.  @kkman4053  Keep waking up every day until the 31 January. Then we've left. That's all the 'roadmap' you need mate.
    3
  15.  @kkman4053  I live in Europe now and I'll live in Europe as a proud European, in the UK, after we have left the EU. Europe is so much more than the EU. Also, if you think the EU's finances are healthy, you have a shock coming your way.
    3
  16.  @kkman4053  Yeah right, sweet deal. Every year further in debt, our industrial base whittled-down, while Germany builds its surplus. Sweet.
    3
  17. MrOkadaman28 You are mistaking Ferguson's observation for prescription.
    3
  18. 2xsive05 Fitting avatar. Rose tinted spec's.
    3
  19.  @paulmcgreevy3011  Well that's my feeling, but not sure just what H was expressing?
    2
  20. Spot-on.
    2
  21.  @kkman4053  Power is the very currency of politics; the maintenance of power is above all else, the job at hand. Show me a government where that is not the case? The EU wants power. It's just they want to exercise that power in a way that is not conducive to healthy democracy.
    2
  22. It would be worth trying this interview again with the gremlins sorted.
    2
  23.  @MrOkadaman28  He is observing. He is not prescribing. Blame whoever you want for the Iraq War but Ferguson is not advocating war, he is warning of its approach.
    2
  24. This issue: 'where will the money come from?'. All of this concern stems from the assumption that, were the western economies to at some stage resume in the form they took prior to lockdowns, they would be hard-pressed to re-pay the debts incurred during lockdown. Surely it is evident that the intention is to scrub out the whole way those economies have been run and to replace their systems with another? It is, after all, referred to as 'The Great Reset' isn't it? Things are not going back. All the small and medium sized business proprietors are continually reassured by their supposed leaders that there will be a return, that the economiesin which they operated will recover. None of what they had will return. Their businesses are extinguished and will not be allowed to resume trading. The premises they occupied, the customers they had and the workers they had will all now belong to the state. Dr Bhattacharya is one of the strongest and most respected sources of information on the viral situation and John Anderson one of the finest commentators; but I'm afraid the globalist/socialist juggernaut is happy to progress while interviews like this take place. They have their mission and it is going to plan. All done by Easter. The west and all of its material wealth; all of its people and all of the future, will be theirs.
    2
  25. Bloom's 'School of Resentment'.
    2
  26. jdg9999 Indeed; and sometimes before. eg Greenspan.
    2
  27.  @jonathanjomen  I see, thank you. I had wondered generally about Melanie's absence from the scene over the 'event' of the past, almost three years.
    2
  28. TRIUMPH It is essential to the grip of the bankers, that the term 'inflation' is confused with price rises. There is inflation and it is the increase in the volume of currency units, be it pounds, dollars, whatever. Every new £ introduced to the economy demeans, dilutes, degrades the buying power of all pre-existing £s. Of course, just one £ would not be noticed, but the UK economy was treated to over £400 billion in recent years, on order that people be paid to stay home, drink tea and watch Netflix. Since then the £ has been greatly reduced in its buying power and the consequence of that is that more of them are required to buy the same stuff they could prior to the 'money printing'. Nothing new about this other than the unprecedented scale; but it is a very tried and tested way that central banks basically steal wealth.
    2
  29. Hairetikos What was your problem?
    1
  30. The greatest 'deterrence' to Russia's SMO, would have been to desist from the encroachment process pursued by the West since the Clinton administration. It's not conspiracy theory, it is historical and documented fact. It seems that both of these men are unable to jump the tracks of the thinking that pertained in their youth. They still see a Soviet bogeyman that no amount of appeal will be granted, to the Russian people that came out of, rejected and survived communism. Similarly they posit a China that is forever to be regarded as expansionist even while it stays at home and builds the goods that the West needs. All of this vilification of both Russia and China takes place - this accusation of their evil global designs - while the US maintains over 800 military bases across the globe and strategically aimed at waging war against them. Why is Russia expected to be happy with US military expansion up to their border, while the US is regarded as wise in maintaining its Monroe Doctrine?
    1
  31. Mike Rose Are you kidding? The US and its pharma giants and its bankers are full-square behind the forces that placed the world in lockdown. I'm not a hater; the actual American people I've met are great people - but the government and authorities are out of whack with reality.
    1
  32.  @annatanneberger1  Ominous developments https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1l34v01crsc
    1
  33. There is science and then there is 'The Science'. Hear some scientists in Martin Durkin's documentary https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4vSMj4R5Rg
    1
  34. The prospect of a vaccine was dangled before the swooning eyes of the public for months. It got here in December 2020, it's been given to all of the 'vulnerable' months ago now and in UK we are assured that over 80% of adults have now been double jabbed. Yet no progress. All talk is of 'variants' which might circumvent the vaccine; of booster jabs needed; and of injecting all this stuff into children. Prof' Battacharya surely knows by now, after all of his expert opinion has been flouted by 'the science', that the lockdowns are not about public health but are in place for reasons very much removed from his field.
    1
  35.  @visualmotor  You got here before me!
    1
  36. In short: get educated, be successful, resist nothing, accept every social change that the powers that be choose to thrust upon you.
    1
  37. The shitshow that is our current situation has been put in place by the action of the US Federal Reserve which was itself modelled on the Bank of England. The two have lorded-it over the world's economies since 1913. The following quotation is taken from a speech given by then Governor of the Bank of England, Montagu Norman, to a gathering of the United States Bankers' Association in 1924, and gives an insight as to the aims of the pact. "Capital must protect itself in every possible way, both by combination and legislation. Debts must be collected, mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible. When, through process of law, the common people lose their homes, they will become more docile and more easily governed through the strong arm of the government applied by a central power of wealth under leading financiers. These truths are well known among our principal men, who are now engaged in forming an imperialism to govern the world. By dividing the voters through the political party system, we can get them to expend their energies in fighting for questions of no importance. It is thus, by discrete action, we can ensure for ourselves that which has been so well planned and so successfully accomplished."
    1
  38. Covid is accelerating nothing. Lockdown is accelerating class-divide.
    1
  39. Nothing has gone wrong with the West's pandemic plans. They planned to use it as an excuse to tear-down their economies and to destroy their societies. Working perfectly thus far.
    1
  40. Aegis.... Good luck with that - China IS the WHO
    1
  41.  @johnmacaroni7028  I stand corrected
    1
  42.  @rob19632  Very much so! A malcontent throughout.
    1
  43. Here's that light at the end of the tunnel. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vUJKgtinvg
    1
  44. The money printing described as 'postponement' of dire consequences, is actually wilful incubation of the conditions that will terminate all the economies that support Western Civilisation. How very opportune that a middle-ranking virus should come skipping along to facilitate all of this by posing as though it were ebola.
    1
  45. There is no such thing as a 'post-covid Australia'. The virus shares the planet with us. The good news is that we have our natural immune systems which have been assailed by thousands of viral attacks over millions of years. We need to look forward to a post-lockdown Australia and World; but before we can do that we have to take back power from the malcontents who presided over the introduction of lockdowns and are still pursuing their plans to destroy Western Civilisation through disabling the economies that feed it. They want to do this so that they can 'Build Back Better'. They are still in very much in power and we are still very much at their mercy.
    1
  46. Mr Anderson, you WILL be locked down again. The Australian people WILL wear it just as people around the world will wear it. If they do rise in any serious way, then they will be subjected to police and military brutality, the like of which we cannot imagine. It will be swift and utterly ruthless and it will cow the people back into their homes. The lockdowns WILL be kept in place for as long as it takes to destroy the economies of the western world. The health scares are merely the pretext for the justification of lockdown. Why the planned self-destruction of economies? How many times do they have to parrot their 'Build Back Better' drone, before we understand that the old edifice must first be razed to the ground? Who would want to do such a thing? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1PDznjKMIeQ
    1
  47. Enough was known about the virus, in March 2020, to assure us that lockdowns were not only unnecessary, but positively harmful.
    1
  48. This is the first time I have heard Mr Hanson speak, and not been impressed. He speaks of the Russian action in Ukraine as an ominous first move in some kind of predatory play for Europe; when the fact is that Putin has been pleading with the West for many years, to halt the eastward advance of NATO and the EU. The response he has had has shown him that those two organisations, indeed do not take Russian concerns seriously. The neo-cons who are the US administration, and who actually direct NATO and the EU, have been quite explicit in stating their aim. They have repeatedly expressed, straight out of their playbook that what they are engaged in here is the pursuit of regime change. They seem to presume that such a change would lead to the installation of a Russian leadership that is more amenable - they presume far too much. Putin is no Gadaffi. The Blinken/Nuland/Sullivan mindset seems to be that Russia is another jewel to add to their collection of global commodities. With Russia's landmass and all of its resources within its ambit, there could be no challenge to the continued hegemony of the Western central bankers. How could anyone think that these aims will have escaped the attention of Chinese strategists? Are they expected to acquiesce in the event that NATO make their move to encircle them?
    1