General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

The Phoenix Saga
BBC News
comments

Comments by "The Phoenix Saga" (@The_Phoenix_Saga) on "BBC News" channel.

Yeah about Afghan... how did that work out for good ole Joe again?
8
@jaffacake8787 correction; people like teams because it means less for them to have to do on their own.
7
And that is war.
6
@buddyrichable1 so is HIV, yet they never released that vaccine did they? Ain't it also curious that this thing is supposed to be as contagious as the flu, yet no one has died of the flu this past year. And always with the "Conspiracy" as if that's supposed to be an insult - I'd sooner play devil's advocate with those theorising then just accept everything I'm told from a broadcaster with clear bias in mind. Did they ever find Blair's Weapons of Mass Destruction by the way? The ones that the mainstream insisted were there and the 'crazy conspiracy theorists' stated otherwise?
5
@a.alphbond9003 Yeah, we also still are curious about that laptop too.
5
You noticed the irony too, I see.
5
Hmph. Kinda stuck aren't we? Buffoon to the right of us in Johnson who couldn't even finish Brexit properly and Starmer to the left of us, who go on claiming that women aren't the only ones to have cervexes.
4
I fully agree. Unfortunately it's not likely to happen - people knowing their rights are trouble makers to those with many fingers in many pies.
3
Well what does this say more about? The ones making the meme or those who immediately accept what they're told or what they read without actually thinking about it and doing their own research before making it a fact in their head? Learn to think for yourselves people - don't be a puppet.
3
@juliotorres3618 clearly shows their intentions doesn't it.
3
Given the attitude of many in the force these days, that matter of 'one individual' comes into question of whether or not it's relevant. I know there's good men and women in the uniform, but how can you discern them from the bad? Also there's a difference between banter - hell I'm no political correctness nut; I've had my fair share of edgy comments, then there's actually going and doing THIS.
3
@theobserver9131 just like they believed Blair over claims of Weapons of Mass Destruction?
2
@darrellwilliams1714 about as much as you can depend on the BBC to cover the protests for antilockdown... no? And how interesting you bring up tiktok - weren't all the doctors and nurses that were SO busy saving lives that they just had the time to record themselves dancing in the halls of the dead and the dying... oh wait you never saw the patients.
2
And bullshit like all of this is why I embrace misanthropy rather marvelously. Man, woman, gay, straight, young, old, black, white Asian and so on - to me you're all equally worthless.
2
@sj4695 Absolute rubbish. If what you're saying is true; explain why Issac was chosen and not Ishmael.
2
@sj4695 let's see; Born miraculously from a barren mother, rather then from out of wedlock like his half brother. From his line the covenant between Elohim and man was made, during the exodus to the land of Caanan with the Ark of said Covernant. Through the line of Judah, via Yacov, son of Issac the Messiah would be born into the world - to which Islam HAS to acknowledge as it claims that events of biblical scripture is accurate... yet they seem to fall short on the Ezra paradox. Funny that. Then when it comes to it, the only reason Palestine exists is because the Romans sacked Jerusalem in 70ad and gave the land to the surrounding tribes who became Christian... before their forced conversion by Omar a few centuries later that is. And today Palestine has no case as a nation because back when Israel was established; both were offered to found a stable foundation in order to become a recognised state - Israel was able to, as promised by Elohim in honouring the promise following the offering of Issac, Palestine in spite of Allah, did not. That last one reminds me a little of Elijah and that king seeing who's God would accept the sacrifice; Elohim or Bael; result... there we go.
2
@markrobinowitz8473 then I suggest you do some digging - took them almost 20 years, but they made one... didn't distribute it because survey say... too costly. So is that negligence or simply incompetence? But for your sake, we'll play advocate; you're telling me that there are viruses that have been known for decades; some cases centuries and there's no progress... yet this whole new one that is claimed to mutate so quickly it entertains a whole world lockdown; without even trying by those same efforts, results have a vaccine in 10 months; one requiring no accountability in those who have conveniently patterned it despite its testing not even complete for another two years. I often entertain the suspension of disbelief but this is just plain asinine to even attempt to make one incredulous enough to accept.
2
@markrobinowitz8473 difference being that I wouldn't just expect you to just accept what I say - I'd want you to actually dig and come to your own conclusions - as opposed to government who can only thrive on support and acceptance of their words as gospel, much like an addict can only go on after a fix. Ever noticed how it's only during election season they strive for your backing with promises that are seldom kept afterward? At the end of the day, If I'm ultimately wrong with incontrovertible evidence, I can live with the ridicule. Question is, can everyone live with the consequence of idlely just accepting the 'truths' of power hungry lunatics which could have been avoided if they'd only been able to think for themselves? More so, if I was actually right?
2
@markrobinowitz8473 and if you think the likes of Fauci aren't on the take, I'd suggest you take that course rather then to prescribe it; medical 'experts' like him make their fortune via political ties and deals as much as, if not more so then their area of expertise; if government is saying one thing and he's going to benefit from it - what do you think he's going to do? Bite the hand that feeds him, even if they're completely wrong?
2
@The Slip just because one bug is going around, doesn't stop another typical one doing so.
2
@The Slip different viruses, same mode of transfer. Sure there's a vaccine for flu; but it never stops people getting it each year and dying from it; mostly since its down to an educated guess to determine which strain is prominent each year, so it really doesn't help at all distributing vaccine A when it's strain B that's the issue. Isolation and panicked ritual hand sanitising isn't doing wonders for the immune system either; as twisted as it sounds the human body is built to work itself better - the more it's exposed the more resistant it gets. And it's always worked, otherwise smallpox and bubonic plaque would have finished us off lifetimes before Edward Jenner's circumstantial invention came along. So the moment lock down ends, people are going to get ill - just like they did last time and guess what it'll be blamed on? It'll be blamed on covid rather then not taking an iota of common sense. I'd suggest taking a good moment to actually think things through by yourself, instead of droning the same mantra over and over, before you try and condescend.
2
@The Slip fact and you just accept it without question because it's just easy to follow instead of figuring things out and challenging what's been said. And yet people have been cured via stem cells, of HIV. In time there will be immunity and there already are people with immunity in just forty years. They knew nothing of Covid? They've known of Covid strains for decades and never could make a single effective vaccine yet all of a sudden a brand new one shows up and they make one, in the snap of ones fingers, in terms of research time. One that got patterned by those granted immunity from prosecution of course. And it's that effective they've had to make dozens of others to keep up... you honestly couldn't make this up; I say that with sarcasm. I think you don't understand the justifications for scrutiny and suspecting an alteriour motive and why it's far better alternative then to just sit down like a good little boy or girl and do what you're told with no thoughts of your own.
2
And he was doing a bloody good job - at least better then the idiots who've been in the last forty years.
2
@HermanWillems we don't hate Europeans, we merely don't want to be dictated to in our own country by the unelected amongst them.
2
Oh but when everyone was claiming Trump rigged the 2016 election - oh it was a different story...
2
@terminallove3531 there wasn't a word for Volcano back before Vesuvius blew and buried Pompeii, actually. The Romans took it as Vulcan - their equivalent of Hephaestus; the God of Ironworks and Craft, being angry about something.
2
And you see - all this bullshit serves nothing more then to fuel the ever growing fire in my sense of misanthropy. Never in the history of man have people been so quick to throw a gamble to an experimental treatment out of fear of an ailment that has killed only the vulnerable and elderly; just like every other illness that ever was, or the shame and ridicule that comes from those who have issue in challenging "authority" in regards to science; a field that can be bought as funding for research comes from those with their own intentions. "The fact our politicians are such blatant liars is not only a testament of their character, but the reflection on ourselves as a society. When the people ask the impossible, only the liars can satisfy" - Thomas Sowell.
2
EpsilonGoods and moral high ground enthusiasts like are only going to encourage them to keep risking their lives and it's going to be left to the working lot to pick up the tab; like always.
1
EpsilonGoods about as much as anyone does these days - all the luxury and freebies without the responsibility that comes to make them possible. It's just that bleeding hearts that crow for them are indoctrinated into justifying it by blaming the actions of the past on the present.
1
@AndrooUK Oh but of course when it isn't the Democrats doing it - it must be true right? Cause for all the talk of rigging in 2016 - I don't recall one lawsuit like this... The spin is clear - they just want their own way and let the useful idiots throw a paddy when it doesn't.
1
@PeachesandCream225 And left...how many millions of dollars worth of equipment again in one of the biggest clusterfucks seen since Vietnam... And oh that reminds me - Trump for all his faults not only got the idiot in North Korea to stop launching missiles, but actually was the first president in almost a century to NOT start a bloody war. Joey? Kim was itching on the launch button the moment the old fool place his hand on the book and recited the presidential oath and just look at how eager they are to jump into Ukraine.
1
@sj4695 no of course you're not going to. One sentence: countless points show Issac's favor, what does Ishmael have to show other then surviving a trip and founding a nation?
1
@sj4695 Interesting... you say Allah, you forget though; that's just a title essentially meaning God or Lord. My question to you then is; which one?
1
@sj4695 That doesn't answer the question.
1
wiredly world Oh please; religion of Moses? Muslims in their homelands complain about the Jews returning to refound Israel and won't even let them rebuilt their temple where it was originally - what makes you think those outside those homelands give any less of a damn about the religion of Moses.
1
@Unethical.FandubsGames 12 percent of the world's population are factually psychopathic.
1
@dombrandon3018 You mean just like how everyone was screaming that Trump had somehow rigged the election when he won against Hillary and that Russia had something to do with it? Hypocrisy at its finest - "It's only OK when WE do it" and just look at what drip the US has had for a President these last few years - the old fool can barely handle a flight of stairs much less a nation. And his Vice President? Talks like a five year old and reasons like one too - then again given Brandon's skeletons, unsurprising why he chose her...
1
@lchjr Oh you mean the thinking and ability to object and protest that's clearly being told "shut up and do as you're told" in not so clear terms? And regardless of period, the more things change, the more things stay the same.
1
@markrobinowitz8473 a fact you simply accepted you mean? One I can tell you is that the establishment on both sides can, have and will lie. Ever heard of the expression that history is written by the winners?
1
@The Slip this thing is supposed to be infecting at the rate it is despite the measures taken and yet it transfers the same way as the flu. Meaning flu would still transfer as much as typical in spite of that as viruses don't attack one another meaning the death rate should actually be higher and yet it's the same. It doesn't take a genius to work that out.
1
@The Slip you're talking of the inhibitor - which doesn't cure it, it delays it... and makes phama quite a profit in the long run... no wonder the vaccine hasn't been rolled out. It is a business after all. An emergency that justifies treating the populace like a guinea pig? Cause what we have here is still in its experimental phase until 2023; they can't even guarantee a long term effectiveness, much less deny potential long term damage with no accountability. Oh the Spanish flu... oh I was hoping someone would bring this up; oh it existed and people died; my grandad lost three of his elder sisters to it, however far more people were dying from various ailments at the time: men who had been fighting in WWI were coming home with injuries that were slow burns in terms of complications that led to their deaths. Standards of living were far lower and the fear of the flu saw shops refusing to sell food to people. So a lot of people starved to death or from conditions attributed to malnutrition... but you don't hear about that; all you get is the simple notion of 'oh it's the flu' which was a quick and simple way to avoid going through all the hassle. But looking at how quickly this is becoming nothing but a slant of pedantic condescension from you, I'll give you this. The ability to aqquire personal knowledge from ones own experience and observations is a power; without the means to think for yourself, you're powerless. And so this is how you come on here; touting nothing but the same drab and tiresome refrain from a bias outlet. I won't presume to speak for others, but i will say with adamant confidence that there are plenty who will agree with me when I say I will not capitulate and gamble my future health as a lab rat simply so you can enjoy the delusion of feeling a little safer and have a few crumbs of the liberties you would merrily surrender for it, to those who preach one way and then contradict their words; hiding behind a quick fix that's either a display of incompetence or alterior motive. I mean after all how often has Johnson broken the rules of lock down just so he can stuff his face in public? But fret not; since you like to follow just what you are told, I'll give you an instruction - run along and tell your puppet masters that there are people who are not going to buy into your shit.
1
@lyndonjenkins2534 you're quite correct - division is clearly the objective as it's easier to run a divided and distracted people then a unified and challenging one. Look at all the issues one side brings up and the reaction they give when the other rejects it. Problem unfortunately these days the ability to think for yourself is becoming more and more frowned upon - you think, you can say no, you say no and you become a thorn in ones side. I agree with your stance of respecting people's choice if they choose to get it or not. And I will always state when asked my view: if you think I'm stupid, take the jab, if you think I'm crazy take the jab, but don't take it just because you're passively being coaxed into following orders at the cost of shame and shunning.
1
@The Slip I said that stem cells had been used to cure it before and that the cocktail was an inhibitor - not a very good listener; or reader in this case. Vaccines hadn't been invented? I'd look up a fellow called Edward Jenner if I were you. He'd invented the first vaccine over a hundred years prior to the Spanish Flu... which phased out after two years and didn't have a vaccine for it until 1940; what does that tell you. Truth is stranger then any fiction and clearly you dont understand how to do anything other then what you're told by bias propaganda written by those with too much power but never enough; unsurprising as a man once wrote it's easier to mislead others then to convince them they've been mislead. I explained earlier that if I turned out to be wrong with incontrovertible evidence, I can handle the ridicule - Better to be wrong and the world keep turning then to be another Cassandra; seeing it's end and not be believed. However it seems like you can't take to others having a different view so if you want to keep on living in your narrow view of reality, no one's stopping you.
1
@markrobinowitz8473 then surprise, I have; I do my own homework - not just accept what others claim. Mainstream propaganda or outsider. As for me simply wanting suspecion and paranoia over evidence - overlooking that I've said time and again; give me indisputable evidence that can't be taken out of context and I'll more then willingly accept it. For as much as the world ought to know the golden rule of trusting noone absolutely; especially in positions of power and influence, I am not above sound logic. However Fauci time and again has proven himself to contradict his statements within days of each other; one for an expert in his field he certainly doesn't keep a stance for long. Then again now liberties have been taken, if Fauci had his way, they'd never be returned. And history provides many evidences of that being the case. There's a lot of matters that federal or not, aren't supposed to do - yet here we are, living in a world where more often then not, individuals such as himself are caught proverbialy like Clinton - with their pants down. Perhaps people are so easily taken for fools whilst wrapped up in distracted, blunted lives - so easily taken by fear of never returning to it that they'll sit down and accept anything their leaders say to hopefully return to a 'normal' that will never come without a huge shift in the status quo. If at all.
1
@markrobinowitz8473 Kramer and Fauci making up; I fail to see the relevance. Enlighten me on that issue so I can look that up. If Fauci wasn't aware that an infection could be spread asymptomatically then either I must question his expertise or something was hushed up. And lying for the administration? I wonder what other skeletons are in that closet - integrity in that regard to the public for something so small leads to question for everything else. A smear and not based on facts? Every time people have ever let their liberties go for a necessity, they've almost always have had to resort to force to get it back, because those given too much power become drunk on it: Caesar proved it, Cromwell proved it, Napoleon proved it, Lenin and Stalin proved it, Mao proved it and so did J Edgar Hoover to a degree when many suspected he wasn't just the first head of the FBI but also the country. History tends to repeat and to rhyme; first via tragedy and the second time through a farce. And yes I had heard of a looming pandemic prior to last year - been hearing about them since I can remember taking an interest in the way things work. Each new potential twist escalated beyond reason - look at the panic AIDS had back in the 80s and 90s - took Princess Diana shaking a patients hand before people would sit next to each other again out of fear. I'm aware of Nipah just as I am Ebola and so on - but for heavens sake; it's a wonder the human race has even gotten this far if we're so fragile and so easily frightened to death. People in a few years will likely look back and laugh their heads off at the thoughts that people went through a phase of morbidly aspiring to witness the end of the world. As for Trump and Clinton's connection to Epstein; and? So was Bill Gates - where's his condemnation? Oh he's in the clear as he's all on board for mass vaxxing despite having the medical expertise of a gnat, yet he's touted as an expert in spite of aspiring to reduction of the world's population via medical advancement : even admitted it himself during a talk in 2015 if I'm correct. I'm far from anti vaxxing but I am against just blindly taking a jab that no one's taking accountability for because they rushed it out years too early; calling it an emergency is irrelevant if the cure winds up worse then the disease. I'll give your archives a look through; can't hurt and I'm not opposed to information when offered.
1
@The Slip still under test trial but put on the back benches because of unavailable circumstances... yet here we have an experimental jab that's being heralded without long term data! And if there are dangerous long term effects - tough, the ones patterning it have immunity. Well I can't say I blame you for trying. And the Spanish Flu still petered out like every other before it. Now im curious, if I'm just a paranoid theorist; then why are you so interested? If I'm such an affront to you by speaking with an alternate approach then surely I'm not worth your time.
1
@The Slip The wise man said it best "Necessity is the plea of every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves"
1
@markrobinowitz8473 one act does not give way to excuse others and if he is indeed capable of 'learning' which any rational man or woman is capable of, from his critics - I wonder what he will learn from his critics now. I myself am company to many who work in the medical sector much like yourself; combined with my own findings which I confirm from many opinion is foundation to forming a conclusion. I harbour no delusion to the notions of conservatives nor do I the acclaimed liberals and typical socialists - in fact government is always about opportunity to gain more by denying another. Diplomacy has always been the game of being the cause of the enmity of the sides who all consider you their ally. Yes you are correct about Gates and his back door imperative for Windows and Apple is doing the same with Jobs gone. That will pick up traction too. And for the record - I do not say no vaccine; I merely say no rushed one. It takes years for one good reason - all of the issues need to be ironed out "we believe" as far as I'm concerned, with a new methodology is not good enough. And quarantine, sure I concede is effective; but only for those actually in harms way. Compromising the immune system against other issues for the sake of one, is capricious and asinine. Elderly, young, infirmed; that was all it would take. There is no excuse to shut down the entire planet and drive everyone into a coming crisis; economies are inevitably going to crash once the inflation bubble bursts as it always does with quantitive easing and it'll either be anarchy or totalism - consider Mao's "Great Leap" given the circumstances.
1
@The Slip that's your ultimate argument? Emergency? That excuse sure worked at the end of the Weimar republic, didnt it? Well again, you take your shot if you must, but I say no.
1
@markrobinowitz8473 neither are mine, mine are libertarian; choice and speech along with personal responsibility for both must never be infringed. Ever. Yet it's still in its test phase for this and you can't deny that people have already died having taken it - with long term effects varying from mild to extreme in cases already; a small number? But a percentage none the less and this is short term. The fact the test phase isn't set to end for another 2 years says it all as well, combined with no accountability. You expect people to just blindly accept risk? Sadly most will under the delusion that everything is going to return to normal: it's not. It's going to go on and on and on until everyone is obedient and those who aren't have expired. And you believe that isolating everyone isn't? And putting at risk everyone except those with financial ability, of a financial abyss that they'll never see the end of... without a conditional reset and bail out. "Build back better" and "New Normal" If that doesn't scream eugenics, I don't know what does.
1
@markrobinowitz8473 you'll be surprised. I can't speak for all Libertarians but I can in my own words dismantle your arguments on those three issues; ecology and energy go hand in hand - the argument for climate change would have us go from fossil fuel and nuclear to full renewable. That is impossible to achieve no matter how altruistic it may seem. Hydroelectric via aquaducts and rivers means essentially to drastically alter the environment around the dam meaning a great die off of ecological factors; flora and fauna. Out at sea is an argument for that, but at best it only generates power at certain times of day, at worst it also potentially has risk aspects to marine life on the same scale as an oil spill when it comes to the mechanisms required. Wind power - not only are they dangerous to avian wildlife in flight, you can't control the wind; it doesn't blow all the time. Solar another - even if you layout panels across a desert, a sandstorm would immediately put a stop to that. Plus the materials are toxic elements for the most effective storing of energy: a break immediately spells a problem both for people and wildlife. Then there's battery - what are you going to make it from? How are you going to charge them? What logistics are going to be enough to provide for a growing demand? And on top of all those factors is the COST. the price to even attempt this would be extortionate. Unless everyone accepted the sort of society experienced in China it couldn't be done... and seeing that regime and it's antics; you want to talk to me about empathy. As for your statement regarding claims; sounds to me like you're accusing a lot of people of capitalising on this issue. If that's true then it leaves no imagination as to what those in power could attempt and are suspected of doing. A good example is Musk claiming Tesla won't accept bitcoin for purchase and yet he's not selling or destroying any he's likely accumulated. Ignorances and intolerance? Now I often laugh when they're brought up because those who do are often the biggest hypocrites; those condemning intolerance tend to show no tolerance to those who disagree with their claims. And ignorance? A typical excuse to justify the imposing of a notion with a good fire back in the event of objection; even when it's valid. It's the tragic comedy from those going on about equality, which I will tell you now; unless you want to go extreme nihilist - it's never going to happen; doing so contradicts the idea of evolution, which I noted you approve of. Evolution isn't just survival of the fittest but also those who can adapt the easiest to circumstances beyond control, regardless of its price. Tell me, would you regard discarding your empathy if it meant progressing, or does that conflict with what you would deem normal? Normal itself is semantic, that I personally admit.
1
And all that stemmed from one guy stocking up on to for his B&B for the month like he often did but was unintentionally captured on a broadcasted report... "A person is smart. People are dumb."
1
@Humannondancer NOT getting involved in a new conflict, actually doing more to stablise a practically non-existent economy, improving work standards, opposing the introduction of Chinese government affiliated networks in the country, actually getting that idiot in North Korea to knock it the hell off and more... and you think he was doing more for Russia and the like? Buddy, don't try offering a turd by claiming it as a Snickers. Whilst he's far from a saint, he was leagues better then the guy with two remaining braincells fighting for third place that "apparently" won 80 million votes along with his little stooge who was only chosen for social "identity" points since looking at her actual career - she couldn't organise a pissup in a distillery. Actually read up on things by yourself instead of listening to what mainstream would rather you just accept that they tell you without you even second guessing; much less challenging. Learn to think for yourself: don't be a puppet.
1
Pff got three letters to define why Putin won't go for the nuclear option - M.A.D
1
And whilst everyone is distracted with Russia and Ukraine, just three words for Taiwan: Watch your backs...
1
@akramelseriol6989 Well gee, let me think: maybe the Jews want to return home to the land that they were dragged out of two millenia ago and have been demonised and persecuted ever since...
1
@banksiasong and what exactly is he guilty of?
1
@cactusbuds2979 And you actually believe any of it? Consider the source and the motives before you make such a decision.
1
@dfr6663 well I could have mentioned any one of "Creepy" Joe's many skeletons, but then the old fool can barely even remember the last room he was in, much less anything else. But one instance being - Trump might not be a saint himself, but at least parents don't need to worry about him being around their kids.
1
Shame so few of us state that about our own governments...
1
You Tube I personally stopped listening to the BBC years before then. The fact it came to light that they actively covered up for Saville, was just another particular reason. But "Brexit, Brexit, Brexit' always the only finger of blame by every single remoaner who would have us shackled to that fourth reich in the light of any given tribulation.
1
@jeremysmith8035 maybe if people hadn't reacted to the bloody news and started panic buying en mass. Heavens sake; it's the toilet paper all over again..
1
You Tube bs, Brexit gave us the chance to start working on things ourselves. The only minor issue we have is an establishment that hasn't taken responsibility for actually working things ahead - a brief and very easily resolved matter of removing and replacing. What would you have us do? Bend over and beg the EU whilst wondering what was best to greet them with: a shake of the hand or the Nazi salute?
1
@VelvetMetrolink and the courts clearly know nothing about justice if that is your best argument. When monetary value trumps law and the claim against it - then the whole thing reeks of nothing more then a cheap thrill and a quick buck.
1
@juliotorres3618 No answer to my previous point I see. And you state voting as a business? Well in that case scrutiny is a given for them but again funny how a quick buck shines over altruism. And Far Right? Anything not in league with Stalin and Mao these days is deemed "Far Right" and need I suggest a book or two about the things they did. And where is the backlash against Hillary when she claimed that Trump rigged the election in 2016 which were proved false and no one pursued a lawsuit about it. Where's the cries of outrage there? I'll wait.
1
And this is in a time where digital has a strong hold on today's running - can you imagine what it'd be like, were we living completely cashless and the whole lot went down? It'd be total chaos!
1
For good bloody reason. It's rubbish - as I checked we're allegedly just coming out of an Ice Age; does it take the need of suspending the sense of disbelief to imagine that the world might just get a smidgen hotter because of it?
1
@kizzy2874 and the fact that those giving out these jabs are not only making a killing but also have amnesty from prosecution should anything go array in the future says that phama's out for people's best interests? A healthy population: what good use is that to an industry that depends on the ill? That's like saying what's the point of a government when everyone's obeying the law, thus they can't crack down on anybody but criminals.
1
@kizzy2874 not a lot of them make so much at the expense of your misery. And I am so sick of the whole mocking of "Conspiracy theorising". Seeing how thats what a detective or any well versed officer does for a living - I fail to see how it even holds any weight in a conversation.
1
@kizzy2874 Semantics. It takes a great a deal of personal good restraint to go through all the facts from all accounts to discern from the fraudulent to the legitimate without those three issues. And in courts since you mentioned them - lawyers often utilise bias, emotions and the manipulation of facts to better win over the favor of the ruling. So your argument is null and void - or would you rather have people not think for themselves... or if you prefer "You can think what you want, but only of we agree with it"? And sure; their choice. I advocate freedom of speech and choice - but that swings both ways. Don't chastise, demonise and advocate the penalising for those choosing to object to the status quo of the mainstream - who for the most part would love nothing more then to throw these people into "camps" for their disobedience. Funny - nations that objectified against discrimination and segregation are now implimenting it to thunderous applause.
1
A testament to say "I will do away with some amongst my own, so you know there's no price I won't pay to have things my way." And the likes of Ian Hunt are in league with this lunatic?!
1
On behalf of the people of this nation who've been exploited and mocked by those who were given seat to lead: Johnson, you're fired.
1
@derekbentley196 wait till they justify raising the prices of fuel and the like sky high.
1
@shamrock141 given how people are just sick and tired of either being kept in the dark or flat out lied to by those we're supposed to be able to trust, are you surprised?
1
What a sack of crap.
1
@pixelslightmagic8566 those two caught bonking in their patrol vehicle behind their partner's backs; whilst on duty and ignoring two call out no less, being another example.
1
@A_Casual_NPC you first.
1
@cmdkaboom Oh because Joey "Creepy" Biden and his clueless sidekick Kamala "I laugh before I talk to you like I'm five years old" Harris were the much better choice. Get a grip, wake the hell up and smell the coffee.
1
@DannyDexter123 yeah but half the people here and more aren't the ones who put through the bullshit regulations in the first place.
1