General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
The Phoenix Saga
ITV News
comments
Comments by "The Phoenix Saga" (@The_Phoenix_Saga) on "ITV News" channel.
Previous
1
Next
...
All
Oh wow... look at the crowds... they're jumping over each other to get a wave at Brandon... 😒 please, Trump managed more then this, and they hated him.
9
 @mrprosser843 and treated as a victim by the mainstream.
7
1702's act of union says otherwise. Besides, Scottish Lineage has been in the monarchy since James IV of Scotland became James I of England. I'm not a royalist at all - I find them despondent, outdated and excessive, but face facts: while Scotland uses the Pound Sterling and pays as well as receives tax with it, Scotland has the same brat we do. Get used to it.
7
 @sanewater9021 The economy is in shambles. Our currency, based on debt is worthless. Our industry is all but wiped out - at the mercy of foreign business and likely to suffer further from this obsessive drive to "Net Zero" based on nonsense. Our laws are a joke; punishing the law-abiding yet supporting the law breaker. Our politics are a laughing stock; both the ruling government and opposition. Brexit has essentially been rendered pointless as we're STILL bound through Northern Ireland. Our military has been decimated for the sake of political correctness. And unless kept around for the cheap tact of using it as a tool to demonise and condemn the British people: especially the English, our national identity has been all but annihilated. And just like mommy before him and every other before her, Charlie has done NOTHING.
5
 @sanewater9021 If they have the power to dismantle parliament - and they do. When they have the power to refuse royal ascent - and they do When in the crown court it's the individual verses the crown - which means the MONARCH. They can do a whole lot more then you believe. And if not, or to play devil's advocate and indulge your argument: what is the bloody point of even HAVING them?! "Oh they represent us..." I represent myself just fine. Don't need to have a spoilt brat do that for me. "They bring in revenue..." with a currency that has no real value due to being based on debt like the rest of the world's currencies. "Tourism..." most people in this country couldn't name ten monarchs off the top of their head and label their "achievements" much less anyone else in the world. "You're just jealous..." Being expected to fly around in luxury, stuffing my face and making speeches I never even wrote, whilst at the expense of everyone else who has to work themselves to death just to get by: just because the legs I popped into this world are descended by an opportunist who convinced a bunch of pissed up superstitious halfwits to rally up behind me and make me king... I wouldn't be damned surprised about being envied and despised. Because if I declared myself an Emperor, because i could convince a bunch from a dozen AA groups to follow me, would that make me Emperor? No, they'd lock me away!
4
 @Midnight-ib8tg And again, the Act of union unified the crowns - unfortunately making him king of both by default.
3
What do you all expect in a world where currency is valued only in the belief it's valuable - when in reality it's worthless due to it being based on debt...
2
 @KJGould Oh come on, get a grip: these people aren't being vetted or checked - just blindly let in and now we've seen this happen. How many more times will it take for people to wake the hell up?
2
@@Tom-vi3ji Money based on debt which essentially renders it valueless in the long run. Besides if having monarchy is justified by merits - what exactly have any of them done to warrant it? I can name a good sixty million alone who could and would do better to earn such.
2
 @ibrstellar1080 Better yet - abolish the throne completely.
2
 @culturevulturepapi8948 And someone finally sees it. But it's not just those two - it's all of them. All answering to the same establishment whilst people naively think there's a difference.
1
 @NoNowwwell Glad to see someone else is paying attention. Can I trust that you're not even going to tick one of the boxes?
1
 @culturevulturepapi8948 You see it. That's good.
1
 @christiancorujo2369 And that's what establishment wants - they're not wanting people to think and act for themselves - that makes them more inclined to ask questions and challenge the narrative and that doesn't work for them. No, what they want is for us to be obedient workers: just smart enough to work the machines and do the paperwork but not so much so as to passively accept being screwed over in our ignorance as we're gulled into ticking the box and thus enabling our own suppression again and again.
1
 @bg1616 And even those are written out solely to tell you what you want to hear just to lull you into ticking. The reality is they're all on the same payroll.
1
 @bg1616 That unwritten part is exactly the same with each and every one... and yet people keep ticking for them.
1
 @bg1616 You can't prevent evil by permitting evil. And in the choosing of parties - there is no greater or lesser: they answer to the same and by choosing to engage, you've simply allowed it and that in itself is the worst evil.
1
 @bg1616 Then you are truly oblivious.
1
 @bg1616 I gladly offer a solution: it's called, grow up, take responsibility and accountability for your own actions instead of giving power over to a complete stranger to act in your name and others, even if the majority choice is to that whom you didn't select yourself. Actually not voting isn't a vote: you don't vote and so you have signed a contract consenting power in your name.
1
 @bg1616 You haven't exactly understood the term "Exact wording of a contract" have you. What else is a tick on a voting paper if not a form of contract. And by my not ticking and thus signing, how am I at all accountable to accepting it's terms. Come now do I need to hold your hand with this? If everyone refused to take part, or the majority turned and told those in establishment where to go - what exactly could they do. They would be a few hundred against a few minimum, in one nation alone.
1
 @bg1616 Then you go along now, tick your box and keep fooling yourself into thinking you're "Doing the right thing" just like the mindless, obedient puppet establishment wants you to be. On my own? Why thank you, because that's the point: I'd sooner depend on myself and be responsible for myself, then to ever surrender to a complete stranger who "Is out on my behalf" 🙄
1
 @wynbrown5985 Irish blood in me too - though from how small the crowd actually is, it's nowhere as grandiose as which they claimed it would be. I guess Ireland only has a minority of easily driven halfwits... can't say the same for England and Wales - who's blood I also carry; blind puppets. Then there's Scotland - that pillock who got in only needs to try pushing for a ban of alcohol and pork and it'll be incitement to riot.
1
 @KJGould 🙄 Seriously? Fine - since it needs to be spelled out to you: nationals are the responsibility of the nation. If there's no past record of them before they act, it's unavoidable. However the mass migration is utterly irresponsible, for the fact so many who are not the responsibility of the nation, nor it's people, are coming in en mass. Put another way - if you've got a family, would you let a complete stranger live in your own house along side them?
1
I agree with all of that - but vote reform? As if any party who isn't in bed with the status quo would EVER be permitted the chance of getting into power. As long as the system remains in place, voting is meaningless other then to keep the easily herded in line.
1
 @michaelc3977 Then consider them feelings if that makes the bleeding hearts feel better.
1
 @DuncanHarbison Nobody in England did either.
1
"And today on the political puppet show~!"
1
Previous
1
Next
...
All