General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

The Phoenix Saga
History Debunked
comments

Comments by "The Phoenix Saga" (@The_Phoenix_Saga) on "History Debunked" channel.

"A city can survive it's ambitious and even it's fools but it can not survive treason from within." The threat that is coming has been invited by those from within.
616
Orwell would turned in his grave if he saw how right he turned out to be.
87
The greatest of people's are never valued in their own time, just as true prophets are never welcome in their own homeland.
53
Define "Dignity" sir, cause at this point we've already passed that marker of no return. It's either a matter of "Fuck it" or "We're fucked."
48
He DEFENDED him, not failed to prosecute.
41
Powell was right - the one man who stood up to point out the problem and could have turned us away from this problem and they crucified him.
40
We've barely enough troops to defend ourselves for about two weeks - what makes him think he's going to have any to send... Cause if he thinks drafting is gonna work, I think I speak for more than enough when I say I've got two words for him....
40
Nothing. Ideological Subversion has done it's work over the last hundred years.
33
It's people need to grow a backbone and reject the entire system. An amendment like the constitution is just a piece of paper and written on it are "privileges" not "rights" for a right can't just be given to you, you have to declare that right and be prepared to fight and even die for it. Fail that or back down when pressed and you lose that right. A privilege is given but can just as easily be taken away, that's the difference.
33
@Maureen.Silivri What we're seeing is only the calm. When things get really bad, you'll think these present times are a heavenly past time.
32
@Uduwerage There's only two simple routes - you either are, or you are not.
30
Only one thing you can do - and it's something the average Brit won't do. And to think we were once the envy of the world, now we're a mockery of ourselves.
29
Fact is unfortunately that whilst they didn't vote for HIM, they still voted and thus accepted the operandi of the process.
28
 @barbsussex3865 Difference is the politicians aren't gormless - they're complicit on behalf of their masters.
28
@candy-le4nh 🙄 It never occur to you that he deliberately dropped the ball to get him off the hook... honestly sweetie, pay attention.
27
And yet people will vote anyway.
26
Vote anyone at all and still sign consent for the same system to remain in place with a new set of faces to blame who are just as easy to replace.
26
As a wise man wrote "Cut out a man's tongue and you show the world that you're afraid of what he might say" I mean after all - if the likes of Belfield are just "Conspiracy Theorists" then why worry? Why go so far in this paranoid notion of stalking - of which he'd be renowned for being pretty poor at it? Because - and yes I'm stating the obvious, this wasn't about any 'stalking' it was about what he was saying and since it seems he was touching the rawer nerves of someone with too many fingers in too many pies, they've been at risk of exposure and so they've shushed him up and proven to be the gutless, guilty cowards we know them to be and what they've proven to be.
26
You must understand the nature of sociopathic egotists. The only thing they want more than absolute control and power, is more control and power. If people stopped electing others to govern them and stopped elevating such positions to almost reverence, such control freaks wouldn't have a leg to stand on. They're to blame for their own decisions, the public are to blame for being so incompetent as to put them there in order to make those choices.
25
The sign of a true politician.
20
And yet the Natives themselves are elected there by the clueless Hobbits with not one ounce of original thought amongst the many of them. Instead they choose to cling desperately to the very system that aims to destroy them too. And the Eye of Sauron is ever watching, waiting, preparing.
19
Yet slavery has been illegal in England and later the whole of the UK since 1102; the moment a slave entered British territory, they were free men and women.
18
I am staunch opposed to playing the game of voting as I would imagine my comment history portrays. However whilst I stand by that stance, I can see something in Trump that works: establishment clearly hates the man enough that they're pulling out all stops to keep him from power. That tells me enough that he's not playing their game and I believe that this calls for the mantra to be said: the enemy of my enemy is my friend.
14
Yet profoundly, people vote and thus consent to it.
14
In a bizarre twist - in spite of the fact I share your proclivity to this madness; it's somewhat a blessing in disguise. If a nation is so compelled to destroy itself on its own efforts, then it is a nation; like those before it, doomed to fail no matter what road it would take. And as a misanthropic, borderline nihilist with a penchant for schadenfreude; I can't help but watch on and laugh amidst my own frustration toward current events. Reality truly is wedded to a bitch called irony.
14
I'd agree completely, but there's two things in this world I don't believe in: Karma and Coincidence.
14
Rather Germany of the 1930s, isn't it.
13
And they're all the same - which is why the vote is a complete waste of time. Only difference is Keir is more blatant about it.
13
@HistoryDebunkedsimonwebb We need individual accountability and responsibility if anything else. Voting isn't going to make a lick of difference - all its doing is justifying and consenting to this charade in the names of those who vote within the system. Point being - if you're voting; even if you protest, you're giving those who are in charge what they want.
13
@EvenBigger-Brother Don't put that demon's name along with one of the very few good men of the last century.
13
@leecromer3289 Because establishment have an agenda and any party getting in, either complies or finds itself replaced. All politicians are on the same payroll - that in itself should be telling.
13
GreggFellows When the law of the land appeases the criminal at the expense of the law abiding - to what purpose is there to keep abiding? Either the law works as it's intended, or the law gets disregarded. And even the most chaste and obedient soul will turn when pushed just that little bit too far.
13
 @davidbarlow350 Because the result would have been the same. And by voting they'd have signed away their consent to his authority.
12
They've woken up to the situation in front of them, but not the trap set for them. Each one that votes , is kissing their liberty goodbye for another term; because it's the owners of the state who are really being enabled.
11
@candy-le4nh Doesn't take much proof to demonstrate a case of deliberately acting inept. Not exactly the sharpest knife in the drawer, are you.
11
@25nasar Take that out on her.
11
If a person can not be self sufficient, being united is a pointless endeavor that leads to dictatorship alike the sort we're dealing with. Folk got too used to the state and that lack of strength has lead to complacence and ineptitude whilst they've been let to grow uncontested.
11
@LukeSkywalker522 "Tolerance and apathy are the last virtues of a dying society"
10
Not likely - they're all on the same page behind the scenes. The actions taken are via order, not decision and the origin of those orders are not from the public.
10
@harryworth8157 And thank you for making my case for me...😧 the system remains the same... and yet people simply will not learn.
10
Well a simple observation of humanity demonstrates that an opportunist with an opportunity to exploit a reasoned source for further opportunity in the eyes of those dependant on that source, is not so hesitant to utilise it to their advantage. Or as another commenter said once "I tried finding the science and found none. I then tried following the money and along the way I conveniently found the science."
10
Ohoho will you be disappointed if they get in... they're no better than any of the other party's. They ALL answer to the same.
10
@gilessteve Don't give them ideas... or rather don't think that just watching isn't something they haven't realised.
10
@everest9707 They do and that's why establishment ALWAYS gets in. The politicians give the impression of having a choice: you don't, like them you have owners, they own you and all you're doing by going along with it is legitimising their hold.
9
@johntooth1886 and we start by rejecting the system itself.
9
@oldboygeorge7688 know anyone at least 150 years old?
9
And it's done by design to keep "the plebians" in line.
9
@action1976 And you believe them... so naive...
9
@johnmcmahon5145 The US has a chance - Trump's term has bought them all time. Over here we're knackered.
9
Well apparently they thought it alright to cast Ann Boelyn as a black woman...
8
@jamesleonard7439 They're just puppets, haven't you figured that out yet?
8
@Slademanxx Ooooh are you going to be surprised...
8
Been telling folk this and they simply can't see it. Too ideologically subverted.
8
No, it's why people need to start standing their ground on their rights and stop crossing a box to give power to a select few that most wouldn't ever possibly know, over them. A written constitution can be rewritten at will.
8
GreggFellows See how this one turns out then you'll have your answer.
8
 @braindamagedwarvet... And somebody finally gets it. And the sad thing is, it doesn't matter which party gets in, those who own the system will always get their way.
7
@ZoomerHistorian The party also is inevitably going to be made to choose between either compliance with the agenda or the bankrupt insolvency of the state: to which they will be the ones blamed. Guess which one they'll go for.
7
@EvenBigger-Brother 🙄 says the one who speaks of "Allah"
7
@alanbone5512 No no no NO! Voting will not change a thing - the only parties that would get in would be the ones who's members are already lined up with those in the status quo. You can't win a game playing by their rules.
7
@bon3572 That's only because you haven't seen the modus operandi of it. There isn't a party vying for power that isn't complicit with the agenda. Any party that doesn't comply, will never get power for the ruling party answers directly to the establishment who really runs things.
7
@emmanuelcharlesbonney6963 Disingenuous at best. Name one way we've benefited. I'll wait.
7
 @georgemather9082 You still don't get it.
7
@davidpowell6098 please, he's the one who claimed a certain religion was "The perfect one"
6
@sigmaputin6888 it worked best during the 90s when nobody actually pushed for it - those that came to another country integrated and adapted; they weren't pushing for special treatment and the establishments weren't trying to egg it on. Granted this was a period of time in which normalising was promoted and lowered the people's guard.
6
@Mugwumps107 That's the rub: they've already been sold and don't even realise it. As much as they complain the majority mindlessly obey.
6
 @Teadrinker-kg4ve Glad someone else is paying attention.
6
@normansidey5258 Then they are guilty for doing nothing. Living life peacefully is fine but that comes with the responsibility of making sure it remains peaceful; no one is going to do it for you.
6
@politicas3361 I'll tell you one that works: one where each man and woman takes accountability and responsibility for their own actions instead of electing a complete stranger to "represent them"
6
He's a puppet like all of them are - faces for you to blame while the ones who really run things go unimpeded.
6
@incurableromantic4006 What no-one understands is that it doesn't matter who you vote for, establishment simply want you to fill a box. Because whether your choice wins or not, they've got your consent.
6
@archiebald4717 We won't. We're not part of the equation; life imitates art and much like in the words of Braveheart's Longshanks "If we can not beat them out, we'll breed them out."
6
@watch-Dominion-2018 English.
5
Well MAYBE if people stopped voting for someone to do everything for them and started being responsible and accountable for their actions - we would have never come to this state.
5
@thomasrobert4654 I already have. Just too bad the majority either can't because they're so inert and dependant on the system, or won't out of fear for the responsibility and accountability they'll be expected to take up. Ours and all others - are a nation of squabbling children with no direction and who can't think, let alone stand up for themselves.
5
It's mostly too late - the majority have already been pacified into obedience.
5
@BusbyTreeSurgery And it's not like any of the other parties are any better as they're just as much in on it as those two.
5
But don't you realise it's the actual participation in any "vote" that enables the establishment to act how it wants? The politics are just a side show.
5
If you don't put yourself first, who will.
5
Safety and necessary, in the words of William Pitt "It's the argument of tyrants and the creed of slaves."
5
@DoggleBird Most people don't even realise how fascism got into power in the first place. Spoiler - it was invited in by the masses themselves.
5
As if the Royal brats needed a reason to be smeared - they do that with the establishment's existence. The "waycist" whiners though have no argument for their bs.
5
And you believe any other party wouldn't do the same... 🙄
5
@leecromer3289 To follow up - they're all media trained - each party is set up to tell people of certain stances exactly what they want to hear so they'll comply with the process; blissfully ignorant in thinking there's a difference.
5
@misssamjh Along with all those "refugees" who "we just can't get them to do it too..."
5
@thomasrobert4654 A century of subversion on each generation has done that.
5
😂 Raging by powering it... what comedy!
5
Until those cultures then vyy for control once they find themselves snagging at the very things of which makes them different. Case in point - get a strict vegan at a table with a strict meat eater and they both have to share the exact same meal that appeals to both their appetites - what do they have as a meal? And if you can't answer something as basic as that, how can anyone ever have confidence in the ideal of "The greater good".
5
@malcolmhouston7932 You deem that crap and yet you object to all this?
5
@morwickchesterham3875 That would be the circusmaster - the clowns are just there to put on a show.
5
Call it what it is - establishment getting it's way. Those that did vote simply justifies their claim.
4
real guy well they've already done what they do to benefit themselves, now blame is mounting they seek to do what Labour did 12 years ago and leapfrog power and so in turn, the blame.
4
@the_forbinproject2777 exactly.
4
@JH-lf4ql You are completely oblivious.
4
Likewise. And honestly I've had worse chest infections, compared to that little cough; at worst it was a minor nuisance.
4
Him and the party are absolutely no different, save in how they sell their pitch. Each party tells a certain type what they want to hear simply so they'll tick the box and give default consent to ones that all MPs answer to.
4
Even though I'm Jewish and my great grandmother lost her family to the camps - she herself survived by leaving Germany in 32; I cannot stand with these lunatics trying to censor a person's opinion. And here I was always of the standing that my kind weren't as petty as to bitch about what was said to them much like how every militant BLM member does...
4
@englishciderlover7347 That would be all of them.
4
@yiguanas812 All the turn out does is inform the system about how many people have unwittingly surrendered to it and it's masters authority and use that as a legal ground to throw it's weight among the rest.
4
@fanfeck2844 You're clueless if you think the establishment would have an alternative that isn't willing to adhere to the agenda in motion in such a position. They'd be as short lived in position as Truss was.
4
@alanbone5512 "Democracy is always one day away from dictatorship" said the wise man. Another stated wisely that anarchy's mayhem is conjectural whilst the mayhem of the state is historically and factually horrific. And he is right, because the instant people play the game and vote, they by default accept the mayhem that follows even when their own candidate loses... and the status quo like the casino house wins every time.
4
@NotEvenDeathCanSaveU Well then, how do you plan to go to extinction? Cowardly compliance or outright defiance?
4
@johnsmithers8913 No, their role is to make sure the laws make sense and everything runs smoothly because of it. Their role is to obey the orders of the voter, not to originate them. By acting as they are, they have become the very tyrants they claim to stand in defiance of.
4
@Stand663 Any Brits that did take part were far and few - but you're correct. Slavery was abolished in England back in 1102 - long before anywhere else in the world and throughout the time of the Empire, it was illegal.
4
It was amusing watching the MP in Birmingham squirm when she had to juggle between Gay Rights being taught in Schools and Muslims not wanting it taught to their kids. Wasn't too long ago from what I recall...
4
@scaryfakevirus Sounds like an abused partner constantly going back when they should leave "Things will be different this time, I know it!" It's frustrating when you see the whole thing for how it is, isn't it. And it makes you despair because you're stuck wondering - WHY isn't anyone paying attention to this?!
4
It's all done for the one elephant in the room - sterilisation. Cause what happens once the op is done? Natural reproduction becomes impossible.
4
@BillSikes. Then explain the karma of an unborn child who is aborted when their only "misdeed" is that they were born. If Karma existed then bad things would never happen to innocent people.
4
Maybe if we stopped voting them in...
4
@christinerussell113 And yet they've been enabled by the very motions of the ones you claim just want to "Live in peace" you enable one, you make way for all to want enabling - and it gets worse and more depraved the further along it goes.
4
@RillUK I certainly have researched it and frankly his views and theirs aren't too diverse.
3
@thomasrobert4654 Are you serious? The cough a few years ago ought to be a reminder of just how much the masses aren't going to act. They just rolled up their sleeves, covered their faces and complied.
3
I trust you didn't vote then, cause if you did then you accepted the process and regardless of whether you like or hate him - you still conceded to the possibility he would get in.
3
If you believe it won't spread then my friend, you need to wake up and quick.
3
@homebusiness8166 If you believe there's a difference between the parties then you're the one still sleeping.
3
@simondjangothe4349 No, soiling the paper still counts as signing the contract of consent.
3
It's all to do with the debt... the pound is worthless today without it and more people mean more debt to pass on. This is what you get when currency isn't based on physical collateral.
3
@fanfeck2844 No more ridiculous than someone who complains about the system and whines about change yet submits to it by voting in the very same establishment regardless of choice 😧
3
@fanfeck2844 On the contrary it's those who DO vote that need to stop whining because they're the ones who accept the outcome and the matters that are put through in their name. There's only one establishment in this status quo - doesn't matter who chooses to stand for election the same establishment gets in all the same. And you're utterly oblivious if you can't see that.
3
@fanfeck2844 And you're complaining only to support what you're complaining about. Hopelessly oblivious and fixated; what people should be doing, most like yourself won't do.
3
@bigturboxr3i Indeed; what is it they're trying to obliterate as they carry about their deranged philosophy and why as this world descends further into madness and misery are they appearing to thrive? Things in this world I learned at a young age are not what they seem. Our "Betters" as they'd get off on saying, are no exception. sigh Eddie Barzoon.
3
Or as I liked to call it - an IQ test. One of which the majority has failed miserably.
3
As they say "The more things change, the more things stay the same"
3
@TJspaceman How so?
3
@Uduwerage Well first of all, I'm laughing because I often find it SO entertaining when people point the finger and scream "BIGOT!!!" and yet they themselves can't accept that just maybe, someone else just happens to house a completely different opinion to the same matter. Second of all and more relevant to - To be English, Irish, Scot or Welsh; that you have to be born and you simply can't just become that. The criteria for being a Brit? Well British is a political term rather then a national one - anyone can become one and all that simply takes is integration into the culture: rather then waltzing into the country and not only expecting, but rather now demanding to be accommodated for on their grounds of social expectation. Put quite simply - you want to be a Brit then first start learning to BEHAVE like a Brit: no more of this "multicultural" nonsense. And I say the same of Brits who go elsewhere, before you start the argument of how many act in places like Benidorm - I consider them no better then those coming in. Oh and think I'm being too rigid? Think that every culture can be appeased? Every viewpoint satisfied at once? Well then answer me this - a Vegan and an obligate meat eater sit down at a table and they can only eat the same meal as one another: what are you going to feed them? If you can't answer that without contradicting the idea that "Diversity and Inclusivity" can coincide perfectly with "Equality" - then drop the moral posturing in your idea of others being bigoted, simply because you choose to believe the bs and can't even practice what you preach.
3
@englishciderlover7347 Wishful thinking - the only thing assured by parties is that they'll play their part telling folk what they want to hear across the spectrum, simply to gull them into taking part and thus legitimise those who really run things.
3
@davidhull2060 Yeah I've known countless not even know what dial up is, let alone remember a time when to make a phone call, one would typically use a phone booth on a street corner.
3
History clearly is not written by the right, but by the winners; whi clearly are not always right. This lunacy is proof of that.
3
@neuralwarp The people are at the moment the reason why we're in this mess; constantly objecting and complaining about the actions of the state and yet keeping electing people to enable the state.
3
@Goat-8080 And give that one five years tops - they'll have that one legalised... and the thought revolts me.
3
@geoffwright9570 Wake up mate; the idea of equality is just a dream.
3
@gilessteve Don't be so sure. If it can be made by one, it can be exploited, changed or destroyed by another.
3
@bluegoose777 Given how doublespeak and revisionism are two aspects the status quo utilises today as they did then and before - his observation of the vehicle was well noted and well founded. Another wrote how democracy is always a day away from dictatorship and I personally say that the greatest trick a dictator can play is convincing those who they own that their only choices are within the system that keeps them. And people for it, either out of subversion or the fear of just having to do things themselves: they'd sooner live under the illusion of democratic liberty than to live in actual liberty. And then people wonder why things don't change regardless of who wins in democracy. It's a huge red herring and no one wants to admit it.
2
@RillUK If we're not already.
2
@bluegoose777 The nature of liberty is responsibility for the decisions made for ones own actions and the accountability for them and that's what people balk at generally. If the status quo fell tomorrow, most have become so dependent on it that they wouldn't be able to keep going. And that is where it will ultimately end - the snag with progressvisim is that it must always keep going in one direction and not contradict it's own narrative. But that becomes harder and outright impossible to devise and even more so to enforce and then it winds up redacting on previous issues rendering the narrative pointless and it's own virtues null and void. Tolerance and apathy are the final gasps in a dying society and that's where we're headed; with people either blinded by the system or so desperately dependent that they'll fight to defend it.
2
@watch-Dominion-2018 well if you want to be pedantic about it - originally they weren't talking to you either. Go figure.
2
@watch-Dominion-2018 Seeing as I'm English - not identifying as British since the Irish, Scots and Welsh of whom I'm also descended, do not either; that would be MY language to which you refer.
2
Then you'll be disappointed even if they got in. No matter the party, they're sat down and given a choice between compliance with the agenda of those who really run things, or the bankrupt insolvency of the state. To which they'll be named and blamed.
2
Traded for another set of buffoons who will prove themselves just as inept or co-operative with the establishment... Seriously why can't people understand the whole thing is a farce??
2
@Xenophon1 And that'll change things... how?
2
@macclift9956 we have.
2
@alaninsoflo Hence it's easier to fool than it is to convince someone they have been.
2
@Aegmog I played no part. You however ticked the box and consented to the process - so Labour got in through YOUR part. Well done, faithful puppet.
2
Idris, stick to your films.
2
@simondjangothe4349 Don't participate, refuse the system and not play the rigged game that entraps rather then empowers. I choose no-one to represent me other than myself.
2
@DuruttiVisca Don't be so blind.
2
@fanfeck2844 You really are oblivious.
2
@fanfeck2844 😧 Hopeless.
2
@johnnyhall7065 By everyone rejecting the establishment it controls.
2
Unfortunately women demanded "equality" so they got "equality" and now they're expected to go along with it since these lot are basically using their argument. And naturally they don't like it. So are they going to denounce that "equality" now?
2
@jrosam9569 Followed up by further news of how he's toeing the line like all those before him - because he doesn't want to be the one to be blamed for when the state is forced into insolvent bankruptcy.
2
@robm8809 Open your eyes if you're truly awake. You plan to vote don't you? Then they've already beaten you.
2
@bon3572 😧 But you don't extinguish a fire by throwing fuel on it... The only change that comes through this system is the change they want.
2
I acknowledge their request, just as they can be aware of how im electing to equally ignore it.
2
And yet people keep taking part... WHY??
2
@gh-vi9tk And unfortunately we don't have a lot of responsible adults having kids, we've got kids at 18 - 20 who mentally haven't grown past the age of 12 having kids.
2
@vordman Because it frankly makes no difference - they all answer to the same master.
2
The only one who can protect your rights is yourself. Depend on others to defend your rights in your place and you've already surrendered them in exchange for privileges; which unlike rights can just as easily be voted away as they are given.
2
So when are the countries in Africa going to pay reparations? Since their leaders were the ones who sold them while we kept trying to intercept them!
2
@TrudyTrew Each successive is worse than the last as each leapfrog over the input of the former. And all by design.
2
@sternuens And that is exactly what the ones who are really pulling the strings are counting on.
2
I trust you didn't vote then, cause if you did - even if not for this party then they ARE your government as you accepted the possibility of their winning.
2
@jasonuren3479 That's about the smartest thing I've heard so far today and to answer I can very easily do so. Why do people vote them? Laziness, dependence and complacence; all imparted as a habit through subversion at a young age. To put it another way - people balk at the thought of accountability and responsibility for their own actions or lack thereof. Instead they find a degree of comfort in blaming someone else, so they'll vote for someone - completely unaware of what they're giving up. A right is only yours for as much as you're prepared to stand your ground and fight for it: by passing the matter to another, you relinquish that right and lose it outright, to be exchanged for the illusion of a right . That right is in truth, a privilege and they can just as easily be taken as given. Issue also lays in the fact that MPs and politicians of all sorts aren't ever the ones who really run the country - they're just the face to placate the masses and fool them in thinking there ever was a difference between any of them. The ones that are different and don't ever go with the agenda of establishment, never get into power or they're utterly destroyed by the media from the very beginning. And you may think "But I vote for these different ones" but it doesn't matter - what the vote actually does is get you to legally sign consent for establishment to act how it wants, when it wants in your name. So if you've ever voted and hated what's happened while their puppets are in power - you're just as guilty of their deeds as they are because you permitted them to do it: whether your choice got in or not. However people never look this deep into things - chances are most tuned out of just this comment alone before now... and that lack of attention span is what the establishment is counting on. Tell a person how things are run and they lose interest. Mention football or some half starved celebrity with substance problems and suddenly everyone is a philosopher - distractions: bread and circuses while in truth holding people in binds they can't even see they've let themselves be put in... because it's "easier" to do what they're told. Puppeted idiots, the lot of them.
2
@MrDaiseymay It takes people being able to be dependant on themselves to even make up anything more then a collective of unorganised, whining rabble who wince at the very thought of hurting someone's feelings. I follow nobody other then myself.
2
@jasonuren3479 That was implied in my comment, but absolutely on point. People are being taught this mindset deliberately and each generation is getting worse for it - smart enough to work machinery but stupid enough to not ask why.
2
@AReallyLongAndUnremakableUser factually you are correct - as the "Heavenly Host" who was cast down is actually never mentioned by name, but much like those that fell with him, he is referenced only as "Ha-Satan" which means The Accuser or The Adversary.
2
@Probably_Talhah There were the blatant telltale signs that this was coming. You allow one taboo and the rest use the same argument to justify themselves. And if you advocated for one, you find yourself called for making a rule for one and a rule for another.
2
@AReallyLongAndUnremakableUser Yeah I know the breakdown - however Ha-Satan comes from a language far older than the Greek and Latin for which the modern day is defined.
2
Good, we can start by being responsible and accountable for ourselves by refusing to vote in the next few week and thus reject establishment.
2
@PeteH0121 Those who are elected are just puppets - the faces of blame. Truth is they all bow and answer to the same few masters that own everyone else, regardless of party and message: their role is simply to fool the people in category A, B and so on, in thinking within the system there is a choice that makes a difference - when the only real choice is to accept giving up control or to reject it... and the masses naively give it up every time an election comes along.
1
@bluegoose777 And when that end comes: what will the people do. Most I predict, will not make it; vae victus, one way or another.
1
And it doesn't matter who you vote for, the establishment that wants to go through with it, will still get in. Worst of tyrants are those willingly and even demanded by the people in their ignorance, to be put in place.
1
@watch-Dominion-2018 you commented on a public video - it's free real estate, as they say.
1
Unsurprising. This world always has a distain for successful minorities - I mean with the Jewish people and the fact that Caucasians make up a grand total of 10 percent of the human population on this rock - both have achieved so much... and of course the rest of the world hates them for it.
1
How ironic that our border force is so unable to stem the tide of migrants but two actual refugees are caught immediately. Shows the priority doesn't it.
1
@listenwatchandwait You ain't pinning it on us - we didn't cross the box, thus we didn't sign a contract of consent, therefore we hold no responsibility for what he's done. Anyone who DID vote; for him or not however...
1
@listenwatchandwait That system doesn't work if nobody votes and certainly not if the majority reject it entirely... But they don't.
1
@jeannemillsom9300 Oh you have GOT to be joking me. Want to know what Nigel "We mustn't alienate them" Farage and his merry folk would do given the keys? Same as every other that have come before him and those around him: EXACTLY as he's told.
1
@luke8329 Absolutely CORRECT.
1
@listenwatchandwait About as high amount of people who turn around and reject it without complaining. What 20 percent of the voting population were the only ones who voted? Why are the other 80 just taking it in silence?? If they all turned around and told these clowns to do one - what exactly could they do, arrest everyone??
1
@listenwatchandwait At 49 percent and lower. If the majority refuse the system and the status quo; what exactly can they do. Why do you think they're enabling all these crossings...
1
@listenwatchandwait No problem; as im alluding to - they're letting them in because they'll cross for whoever once they gain the right to take part. The choice in the ballot is a trick question - the actual asking is whether you want to give consent to be owned for a term by establishment or not, because every box choice leads back to them. The only answer that doesn't is the refusal to take part and to reject the whole thing.
1
Politicians are simply puppets. Establishment is what really runs things and everyone decides whether it runs or not, by ticking the box: regardless of who they tick for, or by not.
1
@thomasrobert4654 And you honestly think a few firebrands are realistically going to change things? The masses not only ignore us but outright strike back on behalf of their masters, who aren't going to do much realistically.
1
@caspice Two words: ideological Subversion. Four stages of that - 1, Demoralisation. 2, Destabilisation. 3, Crisis. 4, Normalisation. And it's been repeated over and over for the last hundred years, so much so each generation has been worse then the last - it's not a matter of people not waking up because they won't, they can't because they've been brainwashed from youth to not even realise they're asleep.
1
@jamesleonard7439 Very good, then you ought to know the vote is nothing but a waste of time and serves only to keep people under control.
1
@Xenophon1 😂 You REALLY don't know how it works do you. You really believe they'll just undo everything by waltzing into power? Nonono that is simply NOT how it works. You see, even if by some chance the party won power, the new PM and the cabinet would be sat down with those who REALLY run the country and told basically - "You have two choices, take your slice and do what you're told like everyone before you, or you're going to find your reputations ruined via the media we control and your careers will be over faster then you can say 'Liz Truss'". They're all either puppets of the establishment or just in it for a paycheck in which they'll just oblige anyway. The establishment will never permit anything less - the messages each party gives out are just a pitch: telling certain people of certain perspectives what they want to hear - in order to get them to do one thing and one thing only: consent. Even if you choice doesn't win, the moment you tick that box, you give establishment legal consent in your name to act as it wants, when it wants until the next vote. It's the ultimate con - to trick people into believing they're free then to have them unwittingly sign themselves into serfdom. How to dictate to people without direct opposition and if you can't see that by now - you're hopeless, just like every other voter, throwing themselves away for nothing.
1
@Xenophon1 To answer your claim on Brexit - it wasn't supposed to happen. They let off the break too quick and made the referendum during a relatively peaceful time. That gave people the chance to think for themselves and lo behold how much they've dragged their feet with Brexit since. It's only in name and now they're looking to sign us up in any which way they can whilst deliberately ruining what's left of the country... and what do people typically blame? Not the government, not those running things, but BREXIT. Just as they want the people to do, so when the next time it comes around, they can say "Now let's hear the RIGHT answer."
1
@the_forbinproject2777 more or less like the drug trade then; "it's illegal but only a problem for you if you dun goof and get caught" and combining that with the fact the UK navy quite frequently disrupted slave ships and forced them back to land; how are the majority of caucasians responsible for slavery at all - especially when the first registered slave owner across the ocean in the US, was a Black African.
1
@halloweenville1 They're not as hidden as most think - they're in plain sight - those who own the land, the money and thus the banks, therefore the businesses and industries including the media. These are the ones who really run things.
1
@halloweenville1 "To hide a leaf, put it in a forest"
1
@halloweenville1 Lol. That argument of yours, repeated by the masses is exactly why we're all in this mess to begin with. Wilful ignorance has now shown it's price and yet here you are still willing to pay despite your complaint.
1
@halloweenville1 Clearly the detail of my vernacular is too vast for your perception. So I'll speak clearly and that isn't meant in condescension. You're looking too deep into the matter, looking to find the ones calling the shots out of the line of sight of the public - to know the politicians aren't the ones in control is good, but you needn't look hard to see where their masters are. Simply consider the fact politicians are out for themselves and are bought: look to see who's funding their matters and you'll find them. Corporations run the world.
1
Until those dinghy divers become the majority of the country of which then, the useful idiots that Starmer, Rayner and Cooper are will find themselves cast out by the very diversity they promoted... and they won't even know why.
1
@Stephen-b6s And yet the people keep voting.
1
@lordofbats3601 well it depends, their new FM could be the one to bring true chaos - I mean if he dared tried bringing in Sharia Law: knowing Scots as I do, having family that are - also he'd be in effect banning alcohol and pork: he'd be inciting for riot.
1
They're unelected, but their puppets are.
1
The coup is underway. People, we deserve everything we get, lest we put a stop to it.
1
Nice in theory; however you can't choose the circumstances of your birth, you can't choose your parents' life choices, education is not a reflection of intelligence; let alone the fact that it's cluttered with idealogical nonsense and whilst getting work is a given - what they deem illegal changes almost daily and in such a vague manner leaves everyone stepping on eggshells. So no, it's not just "not complicated" as you claim.
1
DIFESA_RAZZA_BIANCA Red herring.
1
@Andrew-rc3vh Even America is owned.
1
@rogerwoodhouse7945 it's become more obvious in the last twenty years; that much is true. But have you not realised it's been in place much longer then that? Ideological Subversion sure typically takes only 20 to 25 years to go through its four stages, but it's been embedded into society that much longer by default as each successive generate has become more and more suggestable to it.
1
@rogerwoodhouse7945 first step in solving a problem is realising you have one. Second step is realising when it started; for us it started almost century ago. The reason they're amping things up is down to the window of opportunity for them to actually enact it - though looking at Canada's internet blackout I'd say they've been pretty successful. People so desperate for a connection, almost as if it were their addiction, combined with the lack of alternative means for even the most simplistic of services. The battle isn't won, but seeing how people react in a manner so predictable, it's not looking good. The minority who see it, will either be targets by the majority who succumb, or the powers will simply pull the plug on that majority and let them starve to death. Fear sells very well; even a minor shock, properly timed can leave even the most stoic of men catatonic and ripe for manipulation.
1
@joelc9439 seldom few and they are severely regulated - frequently treated as criminals by the law without even having committing an act.
1
@everest9707 You honestly don't have a clue - establishment OWNS the government and folk paying attention to politics or not, when they tick one box or another they unwittingly accept that status quo acting in their name. What you call a duty, I call a folly of humanity.
1
@evolassunglasses4673 🙄 The local obeys as the government instructs and the government instructs as commanded. They're only going to win if establishment wants them to and if you tick a box, you accept that.
1
They and every other voter.
1
Them and anyone else who ticked a box thinking there's a difference.
1
@lesigh1749 I give myself as opposition instead of depending on a complete stranger to do it for me under the pretense of "representing me" You took part? Then whether for them or not, you gave the ones who own both sides what they want - your compliance and obedience. Really, they couldn't thank you enough. 🙄
1
@lesigh1749 And that is exactly how the establishment wants you to think. Carry on, little puppet. Or perhaps snap your strings and realise that you're being played - greatest way to control a people is convincing them that they have a choice then limit that choice to those who serve the same master.
1
@veronikaquick6738 I gave no permission for anyone to "govern" in my name. I hold my rights, rather then submit to voted privileges that can just as easily be taken away as they are given.
1
@veronikaquick6738 And unfortunately your argument to stand with Reform falls short as it would any other: they all answer to the exact same few who really run things. A certificate sure, but does that sign my consent? No it doesn't. Hence they have to ask every so many years and call it a choice. All you're doing is choosing the face but not the goal. It's an exercise in futility in which you are your own prisoner. Unfortunately the masses buy into it and then wonder and whine when things don't go as they're falsely promised it will. But as a man once said 'easier to fool the man than it is to make him understand he has been fooled' - that and the masses look at responsibility for themselves with frightened abandon. They'd sooner live in the illusion of freedom than to actually dwell in it.
1
@lesigh1749 A democracy in which majority rules, then claims equality for all. Note the paradox in the hypocrisy. Ask yourself - if no one were to vote, who governs? And I tell you this the faces govern when selected and they govern as ordered by those who call things. You do give permission - you concede to the winner, even if they're not your choice do you not?
1
@veronikaquick6738 And that certificate means what of consent? Nothing. Simply means someone else acknowledges I exist. But you see your choice for Reform is the same as any other - they all answer to the same few, so all you're doing is more of the same. I stand simply for people to decide and act for themselves - but then people are so addled with the urgency to obey that it's easier to fool them then make them see that they have been and they believe it better a familiar hell, than an unknown heaven.
1
@lesigh1749 You think yourself free? If you need to go asking someone else whether or not you can do this or that then you are not free. And as for "rights" that's comedy in of itself - you claim you take part for yours; the irony is you surrender yours the moment you tick.
1
@lesigh1749 spoken like an obedient puppet, of a scenario you never asked for - you simply accepted. And when your government does what it does best, you complain and go on about replacing it with another one? Now who's stomping their feet. I gain my freedom by choosing my rights and being prepared to stand my ground by them; unlike you and every other cowed puppet, I don't need to have someone tell me what I can and cannot do, or say or think. If I'm prepared to deal with the response to any of those choices and go all the way to hold my ground, those rights are mine and can't ever be taken - if I submit I lose them. Can you say the same, or do you need someone who you don't even know and who truly cares less about you, to permit you.
1
@lesigh1749 You complain when your government acts as it does and demand a different one - yet I'm the one stomping my feet? I stand my ground for my own choices and I determine my freedoms. Can you say the same or do you need your permission slip, signed by someone who you don't even know and who cares even less about you.
1
@lesigh1749 I pour my scorn on those too weak willed and too clueless to realise they're actively acting as their own jailers in the belief there's actually a difference. But you go then; go tick your little box, clap your hands like a trained seal and maybe your "magical" government is going to just change things for you. I swear, I've seen my fair share of parties - entertained debate with all of them and the more I have, the more I compare you participants as being in an abusive relationship. Completely deluded and in denial of the fact you have a way out, but keep hanging about with the same excuse "It'll be different this time..." it's sad at first, then it becomes pathetic as there is simply no helping someone who won't even attempt to help themselves. I answered the question; you just don't want to face the reality. I'm free because I don't acknowledge any of the system or those in it; you on the other hand cling to it, because without someone to tell you what to do, you'd just stand there with a vacant look and a mind filled with hopelessness.
1
@lesigh1749 Well I tell you what - go grovel behind a group of strangers, hope they throw you a bone and then blame only yourself when they disappoint you over and over again. I have the freedom of bearing no responsibility for their antics, my name isn't logged next to a ticked box of choice - tell me, with Starmer and Co removing your privilege of free speech; how does it feel knowing you enabled that? I have my rights which I'm ready to stand my ground for at all times; you only have privileges they can take from you at any time; you accepted that the moment you ticked. "Shadowy them?" You need only wipe your eyes and unplug your ears to see and understand those who really run things - the same lot who no matter who you put in parliament, will always be the ones answered to and you in your wilful ignorance encourage and enable them.
1
@veronikaquick6738 Of course I offer nothing - that's the point. I'm not here to hold your hand just as you aren't here to hold mine. Better that than the false promises politicians make just so you'll comply and accept the process. As for Hell; I don't speak of it lightly, I'm aware of what that is.
1
@lesigh1749 That's right puppet. Keep telling yourself that. I wrote a more detailed argument. Got removed - now I wonder why that is... your puppeteers don't like people thinking for themselves.
1
@lesigh1749 I'm sorry, am I making you wake up from your little dream? My freedoms are my own. Should try it sometime.
1
@lesigh1749 A demoralised loser? 😂 this coming from one who actually believes what a politician says? They do that for a living; gulling the gullible into ticking the box. One of us is a realist, the other is a hopeless wonder - and I can tell you I am not the latter. I at least have my own solutions, you cry for someone to give you a solution; even for something as ridiculous as getting your foot caught in a bucket. Now go back to sleep and remain wilfully ignorant and forever disappointed.
1
@lesigh1749 Shall I give you a few cookies and a glass of warm milk to help you. I do absolutely nothing I'm told to, I do as I personally am inclined; you're the one doing as you're told as you're the sort putting them into power only to then do as they're told by the select few who run things. Come back when you can truly tell me of anyone vying for power that isn't going to choose compliance over complete bankruptcy of the nation because of a fiscal debt that can't ever be repaid; in the name of the weak minded folk who let it get this far.
1
@lesigh1749 Shall I give you a few cookies and a glass of warm milk to help you. I do absolutely nothing I'm told, I do as I personally am inclined; you're the one doing as you're told as you're the sort putting puppets in charge only to have them do as they're told by the select few who run things. Come back when you can truly tell me of anyone that isn't going to choose compliance in that system over the utter bankruptcy of the nation because of a fiscal debt that can't ever be repaid; in the name of the weak minded folk who let it get this far.
1
Wow nerve touched again - responding with truths establishment doesn't like. And the likes of "LeSigh" actually believes they have a choice.
1
The boys during the 30s would be thinking - "Good Lord, we traded the Germans for this..." if they were as unfortunate to see this being what we've done with their sacrifice.
1
 @williamtell6750 yep.
1
@simondjangothe4349 You could reform the system till you're red in the face: establishment simply will not concede their hold over the masses. Hence such reforms will never occur and to try and impose them through the system is an exercise in futility.
1
@DoggleBird And their underpinnings are irrelevant in the instance where the owners of the country have them by the cajones. Government doesn't work by the party's mandate; they work how they're told to - be it in line with the masses, or like most often, not.
1
@KevinGuy-j5i Then they have absolutely NO right to complain. Play stupid games: win stupid prizes.
1
@KevinGuy-j5i If they're so worried about "Representation" then they need to pull their thumb out and represent themselves. Democracy is dictatorship being polite.
1
Because people are stupid enough to think voting does anything other then justify establishment's authority and said establishment isn't interested in critical thinkers, they want obedient puppets.
1
Because establishment wants obedient puppets, not critical thinkers. And YOU all enable that by voting as if there's a difference.
1
@normansidey5258 And if you do nothing for the fear of retaliation then you are in no matter what way you want to spin it - responsible for the scene your children are brought up in. I'm a father myself and I will tell you it's far worse to have to suffer the consequences of your inaction to the danger, than it is to have the danger be targeted to you because you took a stand. Because at least you have actually tried and haven't demonstrated to your children that cowardice is the way to go; the vice of cowardice doesn't make for strong men and it certainly doesn't make for a good environment for women either - all it does is keep the situation on going and they're the ones who will pay for your weakeness.
1
@PeterLaughton Parliament and their puppeteers via the media who basically lambasted him as a racist and xenophobe. And with people gullible they fell for it and nobody wanted to know him.
1
Brexit was a matter that needed attention regardless - as is the matter of the ECHR, the fact people still addressed immigration before, during and after the process demonstrates the circus in that demand hadn't distracted too much... But people's trust in a government still does.
1
@edwardrowland1853 How? You ever heard the definition, wording of a contract? How can you have to adhere to one you don't sign... think about it.
1
@fanfeck2844 Oh my goodness you are clueless. You stand and you're nothing but a puppet for the establishment - I ought to know, I tried for it across various parties and all the bickering and debating is nothing but a show for the masses to distract from those who really run things. And when you tick that box you submit to it. That's not tinfoil hatting that's seeing things for how they are; naivety is what thinking the establishment is there for YOU, is.
1
@politicas3361 And it's BECAUSE people keep depending on the notion of a government that nothing ever changes. People like the idea of solving problems and benefiting the results but the moment you tell them that it requires them to be reliant on themselves and do things on their own, they balk. That's the hypocritic irony: people are always quick to say someone should do something, but barely ever take the step themselves. The majority are just cowardly obedient puppets lulled into a state of ignorance and establishment counts on it.
1
Of course it was betrayed, establishment never wanted the Leave vote to win, all this is a result of their spite.
1
Sad thing is Italy and Germany back then weren't "Right" at all. Fascism stems from Socialist principles and they're of a "Left" stance. Testament to how the man said "History is written by the winners"
1
@SmartCookie2022 Exactly my point - Starmer's position with him was down to either consent, acquiescence or disinterest - take your pick.
1
@watch-Dominion-2018 There are ALWAYS other options... but voting is simply not the answer - no matter who you vote in, the establishment always wins. No, there's only one real choice; but it's a shame the people won't do it - blind, lazy, complacent and dependant as they are... that choice is to utterly reject the system itself. Refuse to vote and thus refuse in giving your consent for the system to do what it wants, when it wants and all in your name. What you should really be asking is - just how much does your liberty truly mean to you? How far are you prepared to stand your ground for your personal rights? Because the system doesn't grant you rights; it grants you privileges in the illusion of the very rights that you in truth, relinquish with a single tick at the election ballot.
1
I just wish the times would hurry up - even though i know this is merely the threshold.
1
@trilobite54321 If they're God given, they need not be written. Anything written by one man, not on His behalf and accepted by another is not a right.
1
MyNextShotWontMiss And you call for a government to tell you your rights? Or for a piece of parchment written by traitors of a former? For if the US was founded by those seeking freedom from tyranny and were prepared to commit treason - why then is treason still a crime in the US.
1
@MrDaiseymay And vote in and consent to the same system under a different name. 🙄 Seriously, Reform is no different to any other party under the establishment's banner.
1
@trilobite54321 And if you need a government to dictate the constitution to begin with - how many "amendments" have there been now? Then it isn't of God who wrote them. The way this world works is thus - you are born with only two things: borrowed time and choice via free will. But the fact of the matter is few bother to do much with their borrowed time and barely know how to make a choice themselves. How else could a government be formed in the first place, if not for people being too weak in will and in faith? I determine my own rights and I stand by them fiercely despite any opposition. To believe the human race exists without someone out to try and deny you your rights is just plain ludicrous - it's what people do: take all they can from all who will not stop them for fear of dying trying. And at what point do you call that living.
1
Yeah the story goes that a guy called Edward Jenner in 1796 created the first vaccine by taking a sample from one of his maids who had cowpox (Specifically a sample of pus from the blisters of a cowpox sufferer) and used it as the first vaccine against smallpox - the idea was that since they were both of a similar type of virus and those who got cowpox almost never got smallpox so deliberately causing the former would by default prevent the latter... although doing this overlooked pathogens spread by blood and it equally killed as many people as it was advocated that it could save.
1
@TJspaceman Your case in point? To which science are you accusing me of denying?
1
@TheGrimReaper9884 Didn't end well during his lifetime did it.
1
@jabiraidan And if what was discovered upset the status quo's comfortable position at the top; you think that research funding would resume after its publishing? There's a reason why the quote "History is written by the winners" my friend - along with "The wise dog never bites the hand that feeds them" remains as relevant today as it did back then. Meant to respond earlier but never did - it was only after an alert of another commenter that reminded me, so.
1
@jabiraidan And did you read 1984? Spoiler alert - Winston submits and capitulates in the end and he does so after being plopped in a room full of rats, his worst fear. You know who learn from actual history? A fringe minority and who listens to them? Nobody. Why else are the mistakes from history continously repeated? The political landscape today for instance is no different to what it was way back when as the same methodology is utilised - a little fear in the distracted populace is all it takes for them to jump at the nearest way out - one offered by the ones who caused the problem for this purpose and have their objective reached. Those "Scientific advancements" you mention are a side effect of the push towards war so as to out-advance the enemy; which again demonstrates how people haven't learned a thing, because why would any sane man ever want to wage war with another who equally hadn't met the other and had no reason to other then being told that he must. And why would anyone in the "higher echelons" of the proverbial pecking order ever go to such lengths, if not for the sake of maintaining control for themselves and those who they serve. The 'experts' find themselves in little difference.
1
Why are we not surprised...
1
@action1976 That's what they said... and you believe the words of complete strangers who are in the line of work for a comfy pension 🙃 Reform much like every other party just tell you what you want to hear so you'll cross the box and legalise the establishment they all answer to. In short they're lying just like every other party. If they didn't, establishment would have them reamed through the media and have them all replaced.
1
Democracy has been and will always be an illusion - an ether to settle the masses into a herded obedience. Why do you think most tyrants never need force to ascend to power?
1
@martynspooner5822 Naturally. She wound up saying "The Muslims didn't have to sit in" and thus facilitates my point about equality and inclusion - they have the same one fact in common as the extant Jurassic Fish Beast of Aberdeen.
1
@martynspooner5822 I know right?! You and I just had it in our minds that everyone had to be treated on the same level and degree any other regardless of background and so on... what a pair of fools are we...🙄
1
@paulsawtell3991 the proof is in the pudding, when you start digging. Tell me, in government, who do you think has the most power? The last say?
1
@misssamjh Leaving you with all the "enriching" migrants - and that's when they'll take over.
1
@misssamjh A takeover without a single ounce of force. And here is the dilemma: either we side with establishment and they do away with all this - but doing so will be the end of all our liberties: they'll make sure of that. On the other hand, we refuse to do so and find our land conquered by those manipulated by said status quo. Ether way - the game is rigged.
1
@misssamjh They do it a lot to me too. Too close to the truth, much. They're herding us to a dilemma - either we comply with establishment, or convert to them. Either way, they get theirs.
1
@misssamjh It's too late - the nation is already too compromised and the people castrated from their cander. They're all for complaining but think another election will change things; all it will do is change the face of the servant obeying the same master and it ain't the people. That's not me being defeatist, but a realist.
1
@misssamjh It's too late unfortunately - our numbers are rabidly being outnumbered and not even by our own. The rest are never going to accept they have to do something themselves - they just want to cross a box and think one government over another will do things differently and they won't.
1
@davey1602 "Enlightened Values" are a matter of semantics - what one sees as a virtue, another sees as ridiculous. To have a competent government you first need a competent people. And a competent people have no need for a government as they're already able to look after themselves. And impartial? You honestly don't know the human race overall rather well. Whether you like or hate it - we are all subject to an internal bias that acts out whether knowingly or not.
1
@Uduwerage 🙄 The pin drops.
1
@Uduwerage Well what is the definition of being French? Spanish? Ukrainian? Saudi Arabian? Japanese? You do know the difference between being a citizen of a country and actually being of that nationality, right?
1
@Uduwerage Then answer me this - a Caucasian becomes a Japanese citizen, does that suddenly make him Ethnically Japanese? No, it doesn't. And being a British citizen doesn't make you English, Irish, Scottish or Welsh. Perhaps you'd like to explain to every country on Earth that same argument, but oh no; you just would LOVE to point it at England - seeing just how quick you are to fire the "Little England" quip.
1
She can sod the hell off!
1
People oppose them and yet they do nothing. Even IF they got their way, they'd only wind up putting in another lot of puppets to carry on establishment's agenda and nothing will change. There's only one way out of this - and noone has the brass.
1
It's not an attack, it's a victory on their part - they've already been infesting the halls of the establishment, invited in by establishment itself as it was already corrupted enough. This is the burden and the price of enabling power over oneself with that of another. I've said it before and I'll say it again, democracy is the biggest scam there ever was along with monarchy.
1
@patkearney9320 and NATO will sure love waltzing in to "Quell an act of domestic terrorism that the populace are unable to depose" because let's face it - the generation that was last aware of the location of their ballsack is on its way out. Those of us in this current generation that have the same natural tenacity are barely a minority amongst our own peers: look at how many of them vote blindly believing it makes any difference.
1
@TheRuneRealm You always will. That's why when it comes to representation you go with who you can trust most: yourself.
1
@richm2835 Unfortunately so but that also increases the number of people responsible for their legitimising.
1
@robertwootton2161 Any one of them was the worst option.
1
@yolandabrinkman2653 You want to talk about negligence and yet you clearly haven't actually read the writing on the wall you're commenting on. The message is this - No matter what party, no matter what leader - the result is always the same.
1
@tomsmith5488 Not so much apathy, but obliviousness.
1
@yolandabrinkman2653 Snake Oil Salesmen - telling their share of the masses their brand of what they want to hear. If they had won the whole thing, the whole show would have continued like it is now or they'd be out. Truss was an example of that: not playing by their rules so she didn't even last the month. To what end or purpose? They gave what their MPs wanted so until the next time, they had no reason to bother.
1
@yolandabrinkman2653 You give up the moment you capitulate and tick a box next to a name of someone whom you barely know; blindly hoping in that this time "It'll be different" I swear it's like watching someone in an abusive relationship - tell them whats going on and they'll find all manner of reason to justify their misery. I don't give up - I retain my rights unlike everyone who surrenders them for privileges: even less now that the puppet tyrant is putting through such bills as he has.
1
@yolandabrinkman2653 I already have - problem is, everybody else is too deluded in the idea of "You don't vote, you don't get a say" keep the very problem itself going. Why do you think I tell folk - STOP doing it!? But I know full and well it's not ever going to be fixed.
1
@yolandabrinkman2653 You still don't understand. The only ones who get in are those who do what establishment tells them. Those who don't are crushed by the media to whom also answer to establishment. And even if I got in - I'd be made to tow the line or be replaced. Understand. The game is rigged.
1
@yolandabrinkman2653 You seriously don't understand: The. Game. Is. RIGGED.
1
He's both a fool AND a liar. Hence the system welcomes him in as a useful puppet.
1
@Jerry-v7l5q not through the system there isn't.
1
As far as i care - he and his puppeteers are in charge of two things: Jack and Shit. And Jack isn't here.
1
She can do one - my gripe against the royals isn't that they're "white" colour has nothing to do with it. My issue with the royals is the fact the idea of even elevating a family of spoilt brats to a concept of "royalty" is ridiculous, outdated, excessive and pointless. The nation bankrupt, industry barely our own, the law protecting criminals and punishing the law abiding, the military decimated, the politics a joke and the national identity annihilated in every way except to allow idiots like this bint to point fingers and blame the modern generation for the past. And these Royals for generations have done NOTHING.
1
No, but it is ludicrous to think change is going to come within a system that has it's controllers staying the course and isn't going to let anyone upset that. Farage and his crew will either stand in line with those in power or they'll either never get there or they'll be removed. Just like every other party out there.
1
@BillSikes. You're elaborating nothing less then moral relativism driven by emotion. And fact doesn't care about said emotion. And if karma is as absolute as you claim it to be, then the question I ask would have an answer to it: however the reality is that there isn't an answer that doesn't contradict the principle of Karma's nature and if a principle contradicts itself, it cannot be absolute, ergo not fact and thus does not exist.
1
Biblical accounts - Torah, Talmud and New Testament determine homosexuality to be an abhorrent act. Difference is, they don't go out of their way to warrent for ones execution, or from what I'm told by those who have done tours of that part of the world: "Humiliated and defiled" as an example. And there's only one difference between those who are deemed moderate and those who are extremist in the religion that does react to such deeds in such a heinous manner: Those that are acting and those that will.
1
They offer false hope because establishment will make them choose compliance with the agenda or bankruptcy of the state.
1
@TrudyTrew I know how you feel - I hate being right about the things I tell people; to which I'm so frequently ignored only to be proven correct. I tell people not to vote but they do anyway and then complain about both outcome and resulting actions of those who get in.
1
@PaIaeoCIive1684 All that says is that back then people fell for it more.
1
@sandramunroe5073 You never heard the expression "Wording of a contract"? Those who didn't vote, didn't sign said contract which the vote is - in which you accept the outcome of the vote: be it the voters choice who wins or not.
1
@sandramunroe5073 Actually yes I can - because I don't sign the contract I'm retaining my own representation and therefore my own voice so I have more say then any voter ever does because they give that over to a complete stranger who might just likely be someone they'd never even think to give it to. Also learn the differences between rights and privileges. Rights are fought for by individuals and retained by their diligence, a privilege is given and can just as easily be taken away without any say by the individual - now you tell me which one those who get ticked for, are responsible for.
1
@_Melian_Dialogue_ Funny then isn't it that every ballot is numbered. If they're meant to be anonymous then clearly that wouldn't be so, with an x made with the number logged you may as well have signed because it counts just as well in the eyes of the law you support. I surely do not envy your denial to face the truth in that you're being had.
1
Yet you voted for them anyway...
1
@jumblestiltskin1365 And you think they care or that their masters care. That's cute.
1
@anthonygroves9422 And be replaced by Starmer. As if he were any better...
1
@jenniferblane7550 Crazy, complacent, distracted and mentally castrated. Just how establishment wants people to be - they don't want people to be critical and challenge them at every turn: they want obedient puppets that demand to be obedient puppets without knowing that's what they're calling for.
1
@FBXL5 And just who voted her in and gave that council the consent to act.
1
@@maxofficial2 Tell that to the likes of Hamas wanting to ethnically cleanse the Jews. And while at it, condemn the likes of Pakistan and Egypt; who care "Soooo much" about Palestinians that they've refused to take in a single one. Oh but you won't do that. Will you. Take your high grounding elsewhere.
1
My response to idiots like her has always been - when you tolerate a blonde white man portraying Martin Luther King Jr; then we'll talk.
1
@shabbapaul9983 And yet it was the push of their "rights" that has led to these fanatics acting up in the first place; seeing as they use the exact same arguments. You enable one, you compel the rest to seek being enabled.
1
@Probably_Talhah "The way we were born" that is utter nonsense as children have no concept of sexuality until their teens. It comes down to being a choice - call me for saying it - a spade is a spade. It was criminalised because of what else follows in its stead and we're seeing that right now. Opposed to them for their choices? Then don't be surprised when others are opposed to you. So what do you prefer - being anti-gay or advocate to this madness: you can't be both. I should also mention that Islam doesn't change its laws for anyone so it's ridiculous to believe they'll even consider it.
1
@canadianalien370 Care to elaborate?
1
@Probably_Talhah You again fail to see the point - so long as homosexuality is not only accepted, but embraced - these degenerates will only continue to demand the same acceptance, lest they call hypocrisy. I don't call for two men together or two women together to be imprisoned - but I certainly have no respect for it: which is why these lunatics and the ones coming after, I can condemn rightly - because the argument of "Why can't I be accepted, just because I am" isn't something I ever prescribed to. Some things are absolute and it's only with men and woman being together that there is a human race today: you can not and never will get this with a man and a man or a woman with a woman and there's a damn good reason for that.
1
@Probably_Talhah And you utterly miss the point entirely...
1
@morwickchesterham3875 The King is the circusmaster, the owners are those who own the land, the currency, the industries, the businesses, the courts, the judges who they have in their back pocket and of course the institutions such as the media, education and even religion. You're not entirely wrong, just not extensive enough. Establishment owns the politicians - they're just salesmen, there to keep the masses under control and bicker amongst themselves as part of the show to distract everyone. Each one is Media trained for one single purpose - to get you to tick a box; any box, and thus legally have establishment granted your consent to act and what they choose in your name whilst you simultaneously denounce your rights in exchange for the privileges they can give or take away at their leisure.
1
@morwickchesterham3875 Since I commented and a nerve was clearly touched, I'll just say you're right, but think deeper. The king is the circusmaster as the peon of establishment - they're made up of those who own the land, currency, industries and institutions.
1
@surreyscouse2873 They're just the clowns too - you need to realise that the ones who REALLY run the country and the planet aren't ever voted for by the public. Why do you think that no matter how the words change the objective and outcome never does.
1
Oh so it's perfectly OK to recognise Islamophobia, and the whole BLM rant "must be respected"... but you try to point out Anglophobia which is blatantly demonstrated these days - dead silence. Reason one of the day for my misanthropy.
1