Comments by "The Phoenix Saga" (@The_Phoenix_Saga) on "" video.

@j.robertsergertson4513 Because accountability and responsibility are two things most tend to shy from.
4
As much as I tend to agree with you, despite you being a bot channel; I am disinclined to agree. You don't have rights fought for you, you do that yourself; anything like this is a privilege and what can be given can just as easily be taken away. And as much as I find the trans notion ridiculous and object to it fiercely - women "fought for equality" now they're having to demonstrate equality and they don't like it. She's not fighting for rights, she's fighting for hypocrisy and doesn't even realise it.
4
@Nicky68Y Unlike her - standing up for "equality" until it now is expected of her to practice it, J.robertsergertson4513 isn't preaching what he's not going to practice.
2
Nuh uh uh - they wanted equality, they got equality and now they have to practice it.
2
@cherylrobinson7876 No, but it was calling for a change in perspective and acceptance, so your comparison is derived completely by semantics. Irony being is that those rights were already there - what was being called for were privileges via the law enshrining them and what can be given via law can just as easily be taken away, so in essence they called for what they unwillingly gave up. I don't call for the jump, but then I don't go hoping others will fight for my rights - I'm game for doing that myself and I can see how a single crack in the wall neglected for too long will break the dam.
2
@joncooper3188 while pertinent, that response is equally irrelevant.
1
@Saanonymous80 Well to practice what they preach...
1
@MrSaritch57 The hell is this "cis" crap?!
1
@kenbivens1901 How long did it take to come up with that nugget of wisdom and knowledge? Care to share your reasoning or are you just looking to be another Eddie Barzoon in scoring some brownie points in your pursuit of being your own special little creature?
1
@walkawaycat431 Oh please, she's kicking a fuss because the next group behind the feminists and the homosexuals has come along and demanded to treated "equally" using the same argument. The only way she can make any statement like this is if she renounces the arguments of feminism and then the question becomes: what's her argument? And let me reiterate - a privilege is given to others, a right is defended by oneself.
1
@melissahatfield4773 If saying it how it is makes me a troll, then I proudly wear the title. But the truth is the truth - deny it if you want but that's the reality. Nobody said it would be pleasant.
1
@jennifercockfield3218 How doesn't it? Didn't "brave women" fight for equality for them and men under the law? Now they have it and are now expected to live by it, they're complaining and I'M the one not making sense? Or is it that I can tell the difference between a right I'm prepared to stand my ground on and fight for myself as opposed to clinging desperately for a privilege that others gave and can easily take back, that bewilders you?
1
@melissahatfield4773 And that's the comedy of the situation - the trans want "equal rights" too! So you're game to have them but not to practice them by giving them to others? Now I'm one who calls the trans folk what they are - a bunch of clueless nutcases, but that to me reeks of hypocrisy. If you want "equal rights" be prepared to be expected in giving them too. Or in short - practice what you preach.
1
@jennifercockfield3218 I couldn't make it simpler if I tried. If you can't do the mental gymnastics to comprehend a basic stance then that's your issue, not mine.
1
@johnnya390 Basically, yes.
1
@cherylrobinson7876 Interesting argument - and I counter. When the argument for women to be given equality was put through - it opened the floodgates to everything else. "Why can't I be included and accepted just because I'm a woman" was their argument; and now it's being used by the trans - just replace the word woman. The pay was always the same, but don't ever expect someone who works only one hour to receive the same wage as someone who works two in the same job at the same level. Oh and by the way - the "acceptance" for women to vote and work wasn't done on the grounds of altruism and "progression", it was done so as to tax another half of the population and to more easily indoctrinate the kids as more women entered the workforce and the law stipulates that children must receive education. My stance comes down to the fact that equality has never and will never exist - it simply can't and the fact that those who push for it and yet when confronted with something they oppose, contradict their callings- thus not practicing what they preach, demonstrates how it's an exercise in futility. I can object to all this nonsense going on, because I'm not contradicting my stance - feminists do because they have for over a century and worse in current year been stomping their feet whining about being given rights - they expect it, they demand it. Well now these lunatics thinking a gender can be changed like a shirt have sprouted up and the feminists have the perfect opportunity to practice it. And they won't.
1
@walkawaycat431 If she was fighting for rights, why is she needing people to back her up. Work on your own means to reason as a right again is personally fought for, not given to you by others.
1
@walkawaycat431 Oh my god... again "fighting for women's rights..." and again, just like the trans are fighting for theirs and yet women who call for equality aren't prepared to give out what they're wanting to receive. Note the hypocrisy yet? No? How Eddie Barzoon. Deny it all you want, you'll inevitably reach the conclusion someday. And rights; once again are personally fought for, privileges are given.
1