General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

The Phoenix Saga
BlackBeltBarrister
comments

Comments by "The Phoenix Saga" (@The_Phoenix_Saga) on "BlackBeltBarrister" channel.

When the law appeases criminals at the expense of the lawful, what remains the purpose of remaining lawful.
245
😂 He'll laugh them right out of the building.
227
When the law of the land appeases the criminal at the expense of the abiding, to what purpose remains to abide.
70
Agreed. I mean if I'm to refrain from subduing a potential threat to my family then I have no time or patience for the daft c you next Tuesday who came up with it.
68
I've a better alternative - let them go subscription based or take on adverts - nobody with any sense CARES if it goes under.
68
We've already been sold out - establishment is simply changing the context.
66
I ask similar questions to all organised charities - lot of people getting paid...
55
As having been a security guard in retail myself i can contribute - at least regarding myself and those who I've worked with; we have to be 100 percent certain that the culprit has committed the act and have the evidence via footage to prove it. If there's any reasonable doubt, or the footage doesn't exist past circumstantual reasoning, then there is no grounds to approach.
50
@johnallen7807 And you think Reform will do any different... this worship of a party that those opposing the status quo have is astounding. You're in for some disappointment.
43
As i also like to say "Democracy is dictatorship being polite."
40
There's only one person who can stand up for my rights: I see him in every reflection. You'll find the same in regards to yours like everyone else for theirs.
34
Justifiably so.
23
@Bugsy85 Cause he's obeying his masters like any other in his position will. It means nothing to him - the dull masses will keep voting anyway.
21
"Harmful to the environment" That bs has made reason number one of three, for the day to justify my embrace of misanthropy. The idiocy of these pretentious tree huggers.
20
Let the Canadians have him for a while - Charlie has the position in the commonwealth: let his little bastard stepson spend his time there.
16
@Dylanesque coming into the country via a lorry or a dinghy without a visa or citizenship, constitutes as being illegal mate and these people are. And he's earned it? For what, questioning people and likely got a little close to one with too many fingers in too many pies as it were? I'm not the biggest Belfield fan but even I can point out a blatant silencing when I see one; those caught with certain illegal content have been sentenced far more leniantly.
14
I'd make a joke about this, but it's provided it's own punchline...
13
Don't you know? The public have been putting them in power since the system was established - regardless of party.
13
@philhawley1219 "Better quality" he says. 😂 A puppet of the system is a puppet all the same regardless of party.
12
@LuxFerre4242 And you know what Reform will do? Exactly what Labour and Tory have done - EXACTLY what they're told.
12
@Simonsimon-fy3hq I'm disappointed in the fact that after all this - the public still hasn't learned.
11
Welcome to the group. Now just lose all confidence in the political system as well and you're well on your way to start getting things done right for yourself - as I say to everyone.
11
Not only allows them, but actively encourages it.
11
"Individuals do not have the power, that belongs to the government and so on" annnnd that just about shows the illusion of "democracy" now doesn't it.
11
@LickorishAllsorts I don't know - the amount of people I find who whine about the system and yet keep lining up to tick the box anyway.
9
@asambrook76 they're looking for obedience.
8
And people will just see this as the court being either consenting, acquiescent or simply disinterested in the wellbeing of the country and it's people. But it's at least an simpler and quicker way to say they don't care. So answer me this - when the law of the land appeases the law breaker at the expense of the law abiding, to what purpose is there to continue abiding? These migrants - not refugees are coming illegally... and the law is doing NOTHING.
7
Oh for Jove's sake...🙄
6
Or better yet; people shouldn't be peering into other people's windows like a creep.
6
Common implies it's not hard to find and sense implies a means to reason and logic which also leads to critical thinking - ergo a means to challenge what's established. They won't have that: the establishment on both sides of the aisle don't want opposition, they want mindless obedience.
6
Tell that to politicians - they do it all the time.
5
@knockschool How about voting for no one. Didn't that ever come to mind. 🙄
5
@mickpeat6351 I just did and given your situation, i don't know much about the reasoning behind the guards approach so forgive the rather bland remark - from the sounds of it, he sounded like it was an order, which retail security can not instigate in terms of searching personal property. They can detain and have the police arrive so that would have been up to you. The EAS going off would have warrented him asking if you had anything - sometimes checkouts fail to disable tagging on clothes and meat and so on, leading to approach on the door. A simple receipt for me would do unless I had actual proof of anything else. At retail the guard would have needed cctv footage to justify anything further and if you had nothing then he had no reason to pursue.
5
Keep that in mind whenever you vote. The moment you tick the box - even if the winner isn't your choice; you've still signed what's basically a blank cheque for them to act how they want on your behalf.
5
@williamtopping the sign you know the principles of self defense.
5
@lucyhardy-styles-shield2728 Go to your settings, type in Emergency Alerts, unselect the alert approval, done.
5
And it's funny that people don't realise there's no such thing as as successful and honest politician and naively take part getting them in, not realising it doesn't make any difference but that they're signing themselves as responsible for all the wrong done and give up the right to complain.
5
@Stephen-lx9nm I didn't, I don't vote. I don't take part in the system which every one else complains about screwing them over and yet keep lining up to give it permission to.
4
@Stephen-lx9nm Not really a matter of cleverness - just a matter of paying attention.
4
@Eleventhearlofmars Wow... great success... now my sarcasm is put aside: Reform are just another brand of the same puppets for the same show. They'd do exactly the same as the two main parties, just like all the rest. And what that is, is what they're told.
4
@nlwilson4892 the company policy; depending on where you work - I haven't worked retail security in four years now, would have it written in the matter of procedure to not approach anyone without incontrovertible reasoning to do so. If passing though the EAS which is essentially the final spot before the exit past the point of expected payment and it sets off, the guard is expected to investigate the cause within reason. If it's not someone who's been monitored for suspected purposes the best bet is to ask politely of purchase involving high risk items such as alcohol, meat etc. Usually just the receipt will do that for you and that's it. When I used to do retail, if I saw someone coming from the checkouts with bags in hand or so forth and they set off the EAS, they'd just be let through without further hinderence.
4
@bluebottle1617 thanks, though it's been over four years since I was in the retail sector. Much hasn't changed though - most who take up security as a career, not following military service start off via retail... and frankly; retail do get a lot of idiots. Luckily they don't tend to last before they step over the mark and are removed. I just feel for the poor sods who have to deal with them to make that happen. Course the decent ones don't get a break; sometimes the customers can be a right piece of work and it takes a lot of restraint and smarts to resolve those.
4
@michaeldunham3385 I hold them responsible for the fact they crossed or ticked a box and thus accepted the terms of the circumstance they're now complaining about - whether they chose this lot or not, they accepted the terms of a majority speaking clause. Perhaps our guy can make a video explaining the definition of a contract. Then you can understand fully why I can and will blame any and all who vote in a system in which they will always whinge about what comes out of it.
4
And that is dependant on the policy - where I used to work on security you had to have incontrovertible evidence via cctv before you were allowed to approach and challenge. Otherwise you let it go.
4
A belt buckle? SMH FFS people...
4
They didn't take it, we gave it up. Granted you forfeit all rights the moment you choose to elevate someone to power - in exchange for privileges easily given and just as easily taken.
4
@LickorishAllsorts Sure is.
3
😲 The bastard! 😆 Merry Christmas man!
3
@ginvr the truth hurts and denial is comforting, but facts don't care about how you feel. When you made your vote, you accepted the terms of the process and relinquished your rights for the privileges the winners of said process can just as easily give and take away.
3
@ginvr Says one who thinks blindly ticking or crossing a box for a complete stranger is an expression of actual choice. You gave up liberty and for what - the illusion of it while those in office have your permission to act despite all your complaints.
3
@eyesodd It isn't a matter of "Not bothering" it's a matter of avoiding the poisoned apple. And the whole "Trying to make a change" schtick is romantic and all - but it's an exercise in futility; a hamster in a wheel that leads nowhere. All those who take part are doing, is authorising those who run things to do so - therefore you're responsible for everything they do, even if they're not who you chose. So if I'm so bad; for not empowering them by mindlessly cooperating, then what does that make you...
3
Because Reform won't answer to the same establishment... right.
3
@joshuafreshney1206 then the question is - what's harder to bear - liberty in death or life in chains?
3
When the law of the land appeases the criminal at the expense of the law abiding, to what purpose is there to abide by the law? And more so can those who figure this out and figure 'screw it' be blamed?
3
What do you expect? Only liars can satisfy when the people want the impossible and once you give them power over you, you'll almost never get it back.
3
You didn't disable the alert feature?
3
@himagainstill and in case you've missed it - the whole country doesn't care at that point. That judge is one person, outnumbered by seventy million and that seventy million isn't taking no for an answer.
2
I'm one also, so i can comment in agreement. Even by Asda policy, this colleague has overstepped her ability in a severely gross manner. At the same time, it's no surprising that supermarket security is so poor and without training, because said training permits for more promising prospects elsewhere.
2
@Stephen-lx9nm Nope. Try again.
2
@LuxFerre4242 That chance is non existent - not with the fact that the only thing keeping the nation from bankruptcy is governmental obedience.
2
@JoBrady-q8p Actually yes I can, because I did not vote, I'm not responsible for whoever gets in and what they do. Those who do vote however - be it for the winner or lose, are responsible for said winners actions. So I have more say over what's going on then you realise.
2
@skeletoncru302 Absolutely, but don't go even signing the ballot with that either.
2
@gracecollins8415 And as we know - capitulation never works.
2
@ollymeg They assaulted an officer and the police on site, given it's an airport acted accordingly. But now the assailant has been let off and the officers demonized.
2
@PaulBooth-m1d All part of establishment's plan...
2
No it just shows they're doing as they're told as Tories did before them and so on, just as anyone else who get in from this point will. And the masses have only themselves to blame.
2
@dazryan3463 yes, the optional receipt is a frustrating loophole - one I would say was put through without considering that matter. But if I had nothing to hold them on, no reason to suspect, it'd be more prudent to just let them go, investigate the cctv of their route and thus confirm any activity. Most of the time it's been a mishap at the checkout, especially self-scan where the item has been paid but not deactivated. The matter at that point is resolved, depending where you work, the matter is brought up with the checkouts manager to reinforce prudence when it comes to disabling paid items and avoid unnecessary issue. In the event of a confirmed theft, following their leaving the matter would be reported depending on the value and a "watch for" notice so that said shoplifter would be monitored on each following entry and approached upon offence put into effect.
2
@barrieshepherd7694 retail security can not force searches; ie person effects searching physically, any items on your person would have to be revealed on your own means and that you have every right to refuse and demand police intervention, though the police DO have the means to perform such searches. If ever retail security commits such, then an assault claim can be filed. Be aware, however, that should you refuse to cooperate when approached and do not await for the police with that refusal, both security and store can invoke a retraction of your right of entry - basically they can ban you on the grounds of intent. In any event you are approached and challenged incorrectly, it's better to let the guard fall on his or her own sword even if it means an inconvenience on your part despite your innocence. Personally I have no sympathy for a guard who messes up and falsely accuses an individual prepared to retaliate through the process, because if they're in such situation, they aren't doing their job properly.
2
@Dylanesque I dunno does it take a doctor to tell you you're gonna get scalded putting your hand in hot water?
2
@commanderdon4300 violence is never a desirable answer but unfortunately it sometimes winding up being the only one that gets results. When someone, no matter the age is wanting to end you; a scolding tends to not do much good.
2
Come on now - the companies weren't "Impressed" they were always going to do this on their terms. We ARE a bankrupt nation after all and their owners also own the banks whom the nation is indebted to.
2
@annaparry4045 So long as they're within the confines of said law, policy can be prioritised before it. Detaining under citizen's arrest is legal with justified evidence, but most store policies prevent this because they don't want the hassle coming from the risk said detaining can entail.
2
And yet the British keep voting...
2
@eyesodd I'm completely aware of that fact - another fact is that any and all who strive for power fall in the same category. He's just a little bit more open about it than most.
2
And yet if you've voted, you've consented to this anyway.
2
@skibidat9808 "I'm not getting involved" enough said.
2
@charliemintz Absolutely correct and fully agreed. But to play devil's advocate - NO ONE with that training is going to work a Security job at a supermarket, when said training affords much more lucrative options. Hence the supermarkets take what they can get.
2
@DMC888 Exactly. People were supposed to vote Remain in the Establishment's view and due to the referendum taking place in a relative peaceful time, people were actually able to think for themselves and chose to leave. And I can just see that everything since has been deliberately screwed over to give the impression that the wrong choice was made.
2
@noelward8047 You know how to prevent a diagnostic tracker from intervening with a PC's DNS client? No one can know everything mate.
2
You think they'll do that? Forget it - they're doing their part as ordered by the establishment like all the others.
1
@adenwellsmith6908 Well to enable any of that - the first thing people need to do is STOP. VOTING. because the only ones who are ever going to get in, are those that will do what establishment tells them.
1
@nickryder9669 Oh there's ALWAYS one who has to whine about leaving the fourth reich...
1
@Man_v_Cars Oh we could - if only the majority of people would get their act together and do their part. It that's hoping beyond too much - ideological subversion through distraction, demoralisation and disinterest has done it's work.
1
@himagainstill Says who? The law? And who would be there to enforce it if EVERYONE turned around and said "We're doing it. End of."
1
@himagainstill and again - with everyone in the country turning around and saying "We're doing it." Just who exactly would stop them.
1
@himagainstill it's called force mate. When you push a people too far - they tend to figure "Fuck it" and they rebel. In this country even peaceful protest has become illegal - so in the words of another "violent revolution, becomes inevitable."
1
@himagainstill no but people will start one if said MPs keep pushing people too far. People outright rioted during the Poll Tax and it cost Thatcher her premiership. When it comes to that - nobody is going to care what a judge thinks. Follow your own advice.
1
Not a snowball's chance in Dante's Phalegathon...
1
Being thought of planning to do something is that vague an incentive to justify an arrest - it's basically impossible to say or write ANYTHING. How many of us have said something in temper or entertained a thought, but not carried it out for obvious reason - we going to be herded up for that next?! This is a pisstake arrest - PLAIN and SIMPLE.
1
@Simonsimon-fy3hq I was utterly unsurprised when the establishment's puppet began carrying out his orders, like each and every one before him, on each side of the aisle and in every party. My disappointment is that after all this and yet the public simply haven't learned and keep persisting on "We need to follow this one, we need to follow that one..." for goodness sake - haven't any of the mass public got a thought of their own??
1
@LuxFerre4242 That chance you hope for is non-existent. They do as they're told like everyone else - put them in power and they'll turn their back. The situation of the nation is something no one that is going for the role, is going to choose to change course on. After all, would you be the one ready to go down in history as being the one forced to essentially bankrupt the nation? The banks and their business interests own this country.
1
@Lakesider52 Hardly deflecting, simply shining a light on all of it.
1
@wideyxyz2271 I have far more to show for it by doing such. And 650 people voting themselves in - a whole nation of seventy million and more could easily turn and ignore them. Police, military and all the rest can just as easily join that number.
1
@peterstewart6390 So you want to extinguish a fire with fuel? Good luck.
1
@IanLynch-b7e I have my own mind and the ability to both see and admit what others seem too socially conscious to admit themselves.
1
@seewhatifound The majority of them are just puppets going along for the sake of a career, others go along with it for their own self interests and the ones who get the front row seats of power, they're the ones most pally with those who really run things. And I assure you - any and all parties that get power end up in this exact same pattern - establishment won't accept any less.
1
@seewhatifound A few of them are, but the majority of them are just puppets.
1
@apoorww1veteran994 Is that faith or fear? You realise that if they got in, they'd have the same ultimatum as anyone else: compliance or bankruptcy.
1
@martinjackman2943 Then you go ahead and be a good little boy and do as you're told - you go tick your box and give yourself a pat on the back. Then when it all comes crumbling down, realise you've only got yourself to blame.
1
@martinjackman2943 Who?
1
@samrodian919 You still don't get it - they don't care if you spoil the ballot; you've still signed it and that's all that actually matters. Ballots act as a contract in affirming consent to the process - the status quo doesn't care if you're trying to affirm discontent, merely secure your consent, without you even realising it. You've played only yourself.
1
@SusanBell-dl5gr There already isn't - it's already doomed. The amount of folk who cling desperately in thinking "Vote reform!" "Vote this, not that!" have guaranteed it.
1
@gam9063 Paying attention to what is, instead of just what is said. It's nothing secret, nothing hidden in some secret grotto: it's right there in plain sight.
1
@Fitlad75 I'm doing more than the obstinant who insist on keeping the spiral going. People keep complaining about government, yet they just keep on empowering them because they blindly think someone else is going to do things differently so they don't have to. And that's what it all boils down to - a large mass wanting all the luxury but none of the responsibility for it. Then they whine when things don't go their way and often get worse... but apparently I'm the one not trying.
1
@notyourordinarygran Have you actually paid attention to my argument, or are you just content with parroting a response I've already dismantled?
1
@Seashore1403 Nope, realist.
1
@Chippytea99 People chose to do that, that isn't the responsibility of the one uploading.
1
@phill6859 😏 course the officer did...
1
No, they like capitalism, they just want it for themselves with communism for everyone else.
1
@nickryder9669 Oh really; from what I remember- we had an illegal war and Brown sold off our remaining gold reserves thus spiking inflation further beyond the point of no return on a currency already backed on debt. If you're trying to fool anyone, it is only yourself. Both did what the masters of all of them, told them: take the hint.
1
@DJ67mc psh "growth" the only thing that's ever grown is the debt that's owed - unless the pound ceased being backed by debt and found itself based on an actual physical collateral.
1
So many way for an emergency vehicle despite a red light is deemed prosecutable, but deliberate evidence of a bus is not? No wonder there's a lack of confidence in the system...
1
Finally, a strike worth having...
1
@Eleventhearlofmars Because the banks and their business interests run the country de jure - they want their payments and we as a nation are essentially bankrupt. So Reform gets in and what will they do? As they're told like their predecessors have, or refuse and thus have us be defaulting completely; our money realised as worthless and everything else that follows?
1
The first in movement, not the impulsive, has right of way. Short and sweet of it. "Everyone on the road doesnt know how to drive, so act as the example how to." Keeping to that golden rule, is why i have never had an issue i could be blamed for.
1
@ciaran82359 at most you'd have an argument for defamation of character - seeing as there was no item in question, not to mention in the situation, that there was no such theft and unnecessary attention was brought to your person. That said however I perceive as a civil matter between you and the guard so that would be out of the store's hands; as bad as it is - he'd have best made sure without controvertible evidence that there was cause to act and from what you're saying, there was none. He was excessive and poorly judging given from what I've read. As for seeing the footage yourself before his searching - that would not be possible without going through the loop, due to the Data Protection Act; at least it's revisions in the last few years, typically non-security and non-law enforcement are restricted from immediate access of cctv footage even if that is of the individual themselves.
1
@heidiblake7957 it's essentially the same here; until past the point of intended sale - IE, the entrance/exit doors, unless blatant theft is in place: say the individual is opening products and consuming them before discarding the packaging without payment, or removing security tagging from alcohol, approach and challenging (Which is the exception under the notion of theft via consumption) there is no purpose in approaching any individual for the purpose of challenge as any matter with exception to the examples I've just made are at best, purely circumstantial.
1
@nickryder9669 finished?
1
@nickryder9669 still ranting incoherently?
1
@hhtrichard The moment a charity starts paying it's members running it, it ceases to be a charity and becomes a business. A business turning profit at the expense of the gullible shelling with the suffering in mind. It's sick and I will never fund it. Argued left, right or whatever - this is vile no matter how you slice it.
1
@ernestschroeder9762 only those prepared to stand their ground for each right, have any. The moment you choose to empower someone over you, you forfeit any you believe you have in exchange for privileges they choose to give and take from you at their whim.
1
The governing are just the puppets - havent you realised that yet??
1
@clivewilliams3661 They're a puppet show, to make the masses believe they have a say - When in truth all they can choose is the face to blame; to target the symptom and not the cause.
1
@eyesodd Then consider this ominous factor- what if Reform or the other choices acted out the same way? Suppose they answer to the establishment and that the choices result in the same outcome and that you'd be stuck anyway. And no we wouldn't. if the public and all those in the military turned their back and ignored establishment- what exactly could approximately 2000 in governance do to a population of 70 million who don't even acknowledge their claim.
1
@DavidJohnson-yg8qm No, they're just playing the system for themselves. The ones who really run things are those who own the banks and therefore the currency.
1
All guidance dogs and care animals are permitted in store and one is defined by declaration upon approach by Security or Manager. Upon which, Security nor Manager is permitted to determine otherwise. Source - Security Section Leader.
1
@Kj16V They weren't hunting people down en mass and deeming them criminals before their trial - which for the law to do, by its own definition is illegal. Then again, had they won the election, such would have happened anyway, seeing as all politicians answer to the same master regardless of party.
1
@tony_w839 They're crossing the channel ILLEGALLY from a safe country - I and so many others do NOT care what semantics are used to argue that; it's a fact. Those are not refugees, those are not asylum seekers, those are migrants; illegals at that. And the law is doing NOTHING.
1
@engineeredlifeform utter rubbish.
1
@Ozymandi_as nice explanation. But in the end you offer nothing but convenient rationalisation for the government in it's entirety- not just this current party to keep doing nothing and thus prove itself inept. And for all your talk of a "Liberal Democracy" we're living in a police state already where much in the way of speech is restricted for the sake of weak minded folk and their feefees. Most wouldn't recognise actual liberal values if they were slapped in the face by them. Or if they were - they'd whine and cry about it.
1
@Gapis321 And you nailed it. Frankly the fact that beachfront properties aren't having "Environmental Changes" added onto their morgage values, or that insurance companies aren't doing making such either - goes to show that even they know it's complete bs.
1
@KemPeck1701 Isn't it obvious why it doesn't work? People. That's why; plain and simple. They talk a big game when it comes to equality and yet when push comes to shove- even those at the top will push down. The law is fallible because it's created by and enforced by people. Its never worked long term and unfortunately the cycle of history is doomed to repeat with only slight details changing.
1
What I'd like for you to do, is to explain what the currency is backed on and how exactly is it to be repaid back via the loans this nation makes to the bank who prints it along with the interest.
1
@iain4 The system IS the corruption- always was.
1
@iain4 Because it always was and still is the source of it. And those up top want it that way.
1
@carmenbyrne6521 Well of course Diana 'wasn't' knocking boots with a certain Captain, now penniless gardener whilst she and Charlie were still married... 🙄
1
@MrRedeyedJedi depends on the one doing the judging - the authorities should check the facts and rule the fact you are entitled to self defense should someone come with the intention to inflict harm. As for anyone else not there, they just need to be told quite cordially to suck a chode because they don't know what they're talking about.
1
And just what are you going to about it folks? Thats right - nothing, aside from crossing a box and consenting to this. And you wonder why it happens
1
 @MarkPayne-k7l Oh shove it, capitualist.
1
@Dom-De Thanks for providing the fact that those who call it out for what it is, dont last long.
1
The guillotine wasnt medieval and we did it first with either a sword or an axe.
1
@lilyvonshtuup Then i trust you won't ever vote again.
1
@lilyvonshtuup And you think you're going to get that through the system? The government have no plans to start engaging to resolve this and the establishment, doesn't want them to make one. This would be over in a month at the most if the reverse were true - this is being done for a purpose and so long as people keep enabling the system in spite of their complaints, not one change will be made.
1
@lilyvonshtuup Well i can assure you that voting; even out of protest will do no good. The ballot acts as a legally binding contract to permit whoever wins to act in your name and the reality is that all the parties answer to the same establishment. Their difference is only to tell person A what they want to hear and person B what they want; all for the purpose to get your consent on paper.
1
@lilyvonshtuup Unfortunately you're right - too many people indoctrinated into blind acceptance and willful ignorance. As such its an exercise in futility. What's coming isn't a matter of if; only when and the question becomes - will you cower and just toe the line or will you stand your ground and be prepared to go out in a blaze of glory?
1
@TheTimeKeepersJournal a criminal calling a crime gives little incentive for following said law, now doesn't it.
1
This is what you get when you spend your entire life getting complete strangers to "represent" you and defend your "rights"
1
@neilgarland9736 they are few and we are unfortunately a few among the many - the many are the mob and are easily distracted. If the many weren't then all this would have been over before it began.
1
@primrosegoldprimrosegold1265 well since those in charge of the state want to use the mantra "If you've nothing to hide, you have nothing to worry about" to justify the invasion of privacy and argue for intrusive snooping; the same should be argued on the state. For a corrupted state can not stand. Better to live in anarchy then in tyranny.
1
@bowserheadteacher And with that, you have something that those who do take part don't: the right to actually object and argue. The question now is: will you stand your ground to keep it? If yes, then you have my respect.
1
And you can blame the masses who enable it - those who whinge about what the establishment is doing and yet at ten in the morning on election day, they line up itching to cross a box next to their stooge of choice; because they're too clueless and lazy to go and start thinking and acting for themselves.
1
@skibidat9808 Then you have imprisoned yourself with your silence, as such are you still free? For tyrants succeed, only when the good many stay silent and step aside.
1
Not that im giving them much advocacy for what they did - but ironically they tried deporting their unwanted bunch too. Trouble was that nobody would take them.
1
@neonwired4978 are you saying the law doesn't appease the criminal or are you saying there isn't a remaining purpose to remain lawful?
1
@laurastuart3814 Did the BLM rioters behave lawfully? But no one talks about them, do they.
1
@laurastuart3814 Did the BLM? No response I take it.
1
@laurastuart3814 Says you bringing up the rioters. Or is it a rule for one and a rule for another.
1
@laurastuart3814 Well when they were kicking off - damaging and looting whilst running amok - oh they were "avenging" the death of a criminal, but when people reacted to the deaths of three innocent young ones, THAT is a no no? 🙄 hypocrisy!
1
😏 The pin drops.
1
@liverpudd306 Humor me.
1
@DMC888 😂 Because the last one we had went the way they wanted it to...
1