Comments by "Nathan Levesque" (@nathanlevesque7812) on "Explained: Supreme Court Strikes Down (Race-Based) Affirmative Action" video.

  1. He's more worried about how AA made him feel than about how much its absence would have harmed his life.
    4
  2. Ensuring equality isn't an "extra" thing for the oppressed. It's just being realistic about what it takes to protect human rights in a free society.
    3
  3.  @newbieprepper8451  You're just missing the point as always. Eliminating AA is what makes legacy admissions suspect.
    1
  4.  @XanDaManHal  you're being arbitrary
    1
  5.  @unsolicitedditkapics9722  Pretending that the an absence of AA means racial blindness for admissions is not a believable stance.
    1
  6.  @XanDaManHal  by the absence of reasoning
    1
  7. Color blindness doesn't ensure that admissions are fair, it just prevents them from checking if it's unfair.
    1
  8.  @psychonautpupildiallater7734  false
    1
  9.  @ashantilematthew6277  He objectively did lmao. It's not an assumption.
    1
  10.  @g7721  No, but he got AA twice in school, then got hired to two prestigious positions with AA in mind according to the person appointing him...
    1