Comments by "Nathan Levesque" (@nathanlevesque7812) on "Breakdown: Kyle u0026 Krystal Get In HEATED Debate Over Voting Democrat vs. Green With Briahna Joy Gray" video.

  1. The irony is that so much more would have been done for them already if Democrats had slightly more support in 2020.
    3
  2. Yup, completing the puzzle is easier to do if 700 pieces are already there rather than 0. Fixing the Democratic party makes the most sense.
    2
  3. That's not how making a point works...  @murraymadness4674 
    1
  4. All they know how to do is whinge. Actually building something would make it obvious that their efforts are better spent reforming an already viable party.
    1
  5. fatalism and hyperbole  @theIOis 
    1
  6. It's just murky FPTP. You need real PR.
    1
  7. The only way to change the system is through a viable party. There are only two viable parties. Creating a pathway for more than duopoly is an option within one of them.
    1
  8. Green voters fundamentally don't understand how to wield political influence. Voting Democrat doesn't mean you're letting them do whatever. Involvement grants influence. Disengagement breeds irrelevance. Changing a party from the inside works. Trying to create a new party based entirely around being flaky doesn't.
    1
  9. pretty sure it's actually dependent on Chinese people but you're obviously in favor of fantasy so whatever  @ItsDooby 
    1
  10. ranked choice is just the murky version of FPTP actual PR is essential
    1
  11. tell me you think an honor system society wouldn't just immediately devolve into neofeudalism by advocating for anarchy lmao  @jeffreyherrera5069 
    1
  12. Anarchists whenever they have to provide a factual example of their system: there is no true anarchism  @kx7500 
    1
  13. Rank choice is also just murky FPTP so it's not really better anyway.
    1