Comments by "Nathan Levesque" (@nathanlevesque7812) on "Judge Helps Kyle Rittenhouse’s Defense AGAIN" video.

@sunkillsmoon it's called accuracy
7
@sunkillsmoon Why would you put your own word salad into quotation marks? Whichever stance one takes on the actions of people who premeditate gun violence against random civilians, it is vigilantism by definition. On the other hand, there is no proof that the victims did anything other than protest. Also, btw, sources have titles and authors. The name of the platform also helps, but if you put in a URL it might get bounced for any number of reasons (some of which would be your fault, and others that wouldn't).
4
@sunkillsmoon I see you didn't bother to watch the video, as is to be expected of any brainless troll. I'll never understand why your ilk devotes so much energy on being angrily wrong about everything.
2
@sunkillsmoon This video that you are commenting on... Holy fuck do I need to hold your hand the entire way? Also the illegally armed teen is even trying to argue that he was out on the streets HUNTING. That's his defense. He was hunting. You can't make this shit up.
1