Comments by "Historia, Magistra Vitae" (@Historia.Magistra.Vitae.) on "Dave Rubin's BRAINDEAD Take On Gays Living Under Right-Wing Governments" video.

  1.  @Eruptflail  "Our politics are so far right that basic leftist policies are "far left"." The only country that has Far-Right policies enacted as of today, is Argentina.
    3
  2. There is no single Far-Right country to begin with.
    3
  3.  @Thomas-fj8ol  : Fascists haven't been a thing since the WW2 era really. Also personally I'm the epitome of an Anti-Fascist. You need to cope harder than that.
    3
  4.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  : Capitalism is de facto way people and human societies would work and work in general. It doesn't need "normalizing". Capitalism is just the result of free humans making voluntary exchanges with one another in the absence of outside coercion.
    3
  5.  @Thomas-fj8ol  : There is no such thing as "christo-fascism". Such a term is an oxymoron.
    2
  6. There is no such stance. People on the right believe that the best outcome for society is achieved when individual rights and civil liberties are paramount (individualism) and the role — and especially the power — of the government is minimized.
    2
  7. That's socialism for ya...
    2
  8. What Far-Right? There is no Far-Right in France to begin with.
    2
  9.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  : Cope harder.
    2
  10. Left/Right is about politics and economy. There is no such spectrum for social things... that is why we have the conservative/progressive scale.
    2
  11.  @abubaytnighan6480  : Was mainly referring to social, moral and religious values.
    2
  12.  @Thomas-fj8ol  : Those people were from the Far-Left, hun.
    2
  13.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  : Keep coping.
    2
  14. You have no clue what the word Fascism even means, nor what it represented.
    2
  15. Wrong. They have nothing to do with Right wing of any kind whatsoever.
    2
  16.  @Galilelo_Telescope  : Religious extremists are collectivists, just like anyone trying to enforce their social, moral or religious values through the State apparatus. Meanwhile people on the right believe that the best outcome for society is achieved when individual rights and civil liberties are paramount (individualism) and the role — and especially the power — of the government is minimized.
    2
  17.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  : You need to cope harder.
    2
  18. Hamas has nothing to do with Right wing of any kind.
    2
  19.  @volk4523  : Wrong. They are objectively collectivists (pro-Theocracy), just like every single Leftist. They have nothing to do with Right wing of any kind. They are the polar opposite of Right wingers, who believe that the best outcome for society is achieved when individual rights and civil liberties are paramount (individualism) and the role — and especially the power — of the government is minimized.
    2
  20.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  : Nothing to do with Right wing of any kind. Cope harder.
    2
  21.  @Furry-ousNews  "you didnt say one single left wing country....." All of those countries mentioned are Far-Left, also socialist.
    2
  22.  @Thomas-fj8ol  : Cope harder.
    2
  23.  @anonihme5142  "someone please tell him that muslim can be far right or form far right goverments?" They cannot.
    1
  24.  @jessetreadway5249  : They cannot. Far-Right doesn't work that way. People on the right believe that the best outcome for society is achieved when individual rights and civil liberties are paramount (individualism) and the role — and especially the power — of the government is minimized.
    1
  25.  @JimmyNuisance  : The only Far-Right party in Sweden, would be "Liberalerna", assuming they stay true to their political alignment.
    1
  26. You people have no clue what Right wing even is nor what it stands for. Typical Muricans.
    1
  27.  @romulus463  : We Classical Liberals are on the Far-Right, when it comes to the modern day political spectrum.
    1
  28. Nothing to do with Right wing of any kind.
    1
  29.  @TheBeeFactory  " Literally no one believes this awful talking point. " And that is why many of us Europeans laugh at Americans like you. We know your education system is not that good but damn.
    1
  30.  @ryandonahue2489  "Does a loose category created intellectually as an abstraction possess such definite, specific qualities that you can claim a form of government is fits in one category at once and none of the others?" If we are talking about Fascism specifically, it was a totalitarian far-left, socialist 3rd position ideology based on National Syndicalism which they adapted from Georges Sorel. It rejected individualism, capitalism, liberalism/democracy, and marxism. The means of production was organized by national worker syndicals (i.e. trade unions), and the guiding philosophy of the state was Actual Idealism. Fascism was an outgrowth of Sorellian Syndicalism, which itself was an outgrowth from Marxist socialism. The idea was that society would be consolidated (i.e., incorporated) into syndicates (in the Italian context, fascio/fasci) which would be regulated by and serve as organs for the state, or "embody" the state (corpus = body). The purpose was the centralization and synchronization of society under the state, as an end unto itself. To quote Mussolini's infamous aphorism: "All within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state." As created by Mussolini and Giovanni Gentile, Fascism comes from a belief that the "Stateless and Classless society" Communism calls for after its dictatorship cannot achieve Socialism, and that only the State can properly organize a Socialist Society. It cared about unity in a strong central government with society being brought together by syndicalist organizations obedient to the State.
    1
  31.  @robertmiller2720  : "Please stop with this BS; it's tiresome" There is no BS coming from me. Go read some history before commenting.
    1
  32.  @jessetreadway5249  : Keep snorting that copium i guess.
    1
  33.  @ryandonahue2489  "Well, pal, that's what passes for a current definition of fascism. It is the wikipedia description of it. " Fascism refers to Mussolini's ideology. Always has, still does. That is the only definition it has, sourced from an Italian word no less. Now parties which are tying to mimic said ideology, are called Neo-Fascist movements. I guess this is not the only thing Wiki manages to get wrong, but then again, Wiki has never been a credible source for anything.
    1
  34.  @ryandonahue2489  "So you say you're right because your definition is different. " There is no "my definition" though. I'm using the only definition that there is, based on historical facts and reality. It is not my concern, that people are ignorant about it and use the word wrong. But then again, luckily they have me to educate them about these things.
    1
  35. Wrong. National Socialists had nothing to do with Right wing of any kind whatsoever. They were Far-Left socialists who thought that Marxism was doing socialism incorrectly.
    1
  36. Nothing to do with Right wing of any kind. All of those 3rd position movements were Far-Leftists, and socialists to boot.
    1
  37.  @orphaotheseeker2770  "who thinks anything the government does is "socialism"." Wrong. If the government directly owns or controls the means of production, distribution and exchange of goods, then it is socialism by definition.
    1
  38.  @orphaotheseeker2770  "Here he is saying the super conservative catholic church who supported fascist regimes like Francos Spain was "leftist"." It is called Collectivism. Every religious group wanting to use the State apparatus to force their views are part of that Leftist trait. Meanwhile, people on the right believe that the best outcome for society is achieved when individual rights and civil liberties are paramount (individualism) and the role — and especially the power — of the government is minimized.
    1
  39.  @orphaotheseeker2770  "Are you claiming that the government is the same as "a community"?" They most certainly are. Government is the very representative of the community called nation. Socialism is an economic system where the collective (such as workers, guilds, the government etc.) either directly own or control the buildings and tools that make goods and services like farms and factories. This can be achieved through decentralized and direct worker-ownership, or through centralized state-ownership or control of the means of production.
    1
  40.  @orphaotheseeker2770  "Your stubborn insistence doesn't change the reality that fascism is right wing. " Still wrong and has nothing to do with me. Fascism was a totalitarian Far-Left, socialist ideology based on National Syndicalism which they adapted from a French Marxist, known as Georges Sorel. Nothing to do with Right wing of any kind.
    1
  41.  @orphaotheseeker2770  "Scholars, academia and everyone who isn't part of the cult of property (libertarians/Objectivists) agrees with me. " Well of course other socialists, Marxists especially would deny the connection. Fascists were part of the cult of anti-property also.
    1
  42.  @orphaotheseeker2770  "Under fascist Spain, Germany, Greece, Chile, etc. every and all fascist regimes, " Only Italy had a Fascist regime. Spain had reformed Falangism. Germany had National Socialism. All of them were part of the 3rd position movement. Chile under Pinochet was Neoliberal and the complete opposite of previously mentioned socialist countries.
    1
  43.  @orphaotheseeker2770  "the government did NOT "directly own or control" the economy. " Wrong. They did.
    1
  44.  @orphaotheseeker2770  " You conflate war time economy's with "direct ownership and control" because you're a dishonest property worshiping cultist who is utterly incapable of acting in good faith." Socialist economy is nothing more than constant "war time economy".
    1
  45. Nope.
    1
  46. Hamas is Left since they are collectivists, and want to use the State apparatus to force their religious views. Meanwhile, people on the right believe that the best outcome for society is achieved when individual rights and civil liberties are paramount (individualism) and the role — and especially the power — of the government is minimized.
    1
  47.  @kagutsuchi969  "Capitalists will never care about fair. It’s the reason they bought the politicians in the first place. " There would be no politicians to buy in a proper Capitalist society.
    1
  48. He never left Liberalism. He is embracing it as we speak.
    1
  49. There is no Right wing government there.
    1
  50. There is no Far-Right nor Fascism in France... and Fascism was a socialist Far-Left ideology anyways.
    1
  51.  @interdimensionalsteve8172  : There is no Far-Right in France, and Le Pen is Center-Right at best.
    1
  52.  @interdimensionalsteve8172  "Far right was technically second as far as gained seats ... both the far right and left took a lot of seats from Macron " There is no Far-Right in France.
    1
  53.  @j0j0dartiste21  : Not well, that is true.
    1
  54. Wrong. Far-Right country most certainly would allow. But then again, you people most likely have no clue what Far-Right even means or represents.
    1
  55.  @jshowao  Nothing to do with Right wing. People on the right believe that the best outcome for society is achieved when individual rights and civil liberties are paramount (individualism) and the role — and especially the power — of the government is minimized.
    1
  56. Nothing to do with Far-Right whatsoever.
    1
  57. That is socialism for ya.
    1
  58. "...provides zero examples." There has yet to be a Far-Right country. That's probably why. But then again, you people most likely have no clue what Far-Right even means or represents.
    1
  59. It's not about being woke tho.... They represented religious collectivism, where individualism, individual rights and liberties are not a thing.
    1