Comments by "Historia, Magistra Vitae" (@Historia.Magistra.Vitae.) on "\"YOUR WELCOME\" with Michael Malice #341: James Lindsay" video.

  1. "The smear is used to discourage Christians' participation in the political process " One would think that the teachings of Jesus Christ would be enough to discourage Christians' participation in secular politics.
    2
  2. Wrong. Liberalism doesn't mean what you think it means.
    2
  3. The action of "being woke" essentially means being a moral busybody. Then by definition you can only be on the Left, as being a moral busybody makes you a Collectivist, regardless if you advocate for traditional values, religious values, progressive values etc. as you place yourself in the position of an authority and above the individual. Meanwhile the Right specifically advocates for individual rights, liberties, freedom and individualism in general. Therefore, "woke right" is an oxymoron. Not to mention that both Fascism and Neo-Fascism are Far-Left political ideologies and have nothing to do with the Right of any kind, nor with Hitler for that matter as his ideology was National Socialism, not Fascism.
    1
  4. Liberalism doesn't mean what you think it means.
    1
  5. "the more racialist ends of the right wing." Do not exist.
    1
  6. "The idea that a nation which has historically been populated overwhelmingly by Christians, and which continues to be (despite a rapidly declining proportion due to the efforts of the aforementioned state ideology) should be something other than Christian in character is bizarre. " Your nation has never been Christian and there has never been a Christian nation and there never will be. Not in this world. Wanting and trying to establish such Theocracy goes against the teachings of Jesus Christ himself. Christians should never meddle with secular politics in the first place. That is not why we are here.
    1
  7. No such thing as "woke right". Such a term is an oxymoron.
    1
  8. "Right where the monarchist." Only in the 18th century... we are way past that now. Monarchism is a form of governance and not a political ideology anyways. It can also be absolute or hands off or somewhere in between. Could implement socialism or capitalism. All depends on the Monarch.
    1