Comments by "Historia, Magistra Vitae" (@Historia.Magistra.Vitae.) on "Timeline - World History Documentaries" channel.

  1.  @m.r4841  : North Korea is democratic to a degree since they allow people to vote and hold elections in the first place.
    1
  2.  @m.r4841  : They are democratic to a degree, since they allow people to vote and hold elections in the first place.
    1
  3.  @m.r4841  "It's not a secret that Na zis m is an ex treme rig ht wi ng ideol ogy." Incorrect. Natio nal s oci alis m was a t ota litari an f ar-le ft, so ciali st ideol ogy.
    1
  4.  @m.r4841  "Because it is. Nazism is an extreme right wing ideology." Incorrect. Na tio nal s oci alis m w a s a to ta litari an f ar-le ft, so ciali st ideol ogy.
    1
  5. Wrong, soci alism did.
    1
  6.  @MyName-pl7zn  "the fasc ist used the soci alist name but they were far from soc ialist," Wrong. Fasc ism was an outgrowth of Sor ellian Syndi calism, which itself was an outgrowth from Ma rxist soci alism. The idea was that society would be consolidated (i.e., incorporated) into syndicates (in the Italian context, fascio/fasci) which would be regulated by and serve as organs for the state, or "embody" the state (corpus = body). The purpose wasn't the promotion of private interest, but the centralization and synchronization of society under the state, as an end unto itself. To quote Mus solini's infamous aphorism: "All within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state."
    1
  7.  @Preetvnd  : What na zis?
    1
  8.  @Preetvnd  : Nope. I am literally the epitome of an an ti-soc ial ist in general, being it naz ism or fasc ism or ma rxism. Co pe ha rder.
    1
  9.  @Preetvnd  : No pe. Co pe ha rder.
    1
  10.  @m.r4841 : There was no nonsense in that post. Naz ism was a totalitarian far-left , socialist ideology based on ethonationalism.
    1
  11. "Right extremist" party would advocate for Anarcho-Capitalism. You have no clue what you are talking about.
    1
  12.  @wapple4240 : Wrong. It is a branch of socialism.
    1
  13. @Roy J Patterson : Nope, cope harder.
    1
  14.  @Russophile30  : There is no Re publican party in my Scand inavian country, hun.
    1
  15.  @m.r4841  : Incorrect. You have no clue what you are talking about. N atio nal so cia lis m certainly was so ciali sm. It was a tot ali tari an fa r le ft, so ciali st ideo log y which opposed ca pitali sm. Go read some history, kiddo.
    1
  16.  @m.r4841  : You nee d to co pe har der than that.
    1
  17.  @m.r4841  Inc orrect. You have no cl ue wh at you are talki ng about. N atio nal so cia lis m certainly was so ciali sm. It was a tot ali tari an fa r le ft, so ciali st ideo log y which opposed ca pitali sm. Go read some history, kiddo.
    1
  18.  @m.r4841  : You need to cope harder than that.
    1
  19.  @m.r4841  : Nope. Cope harder.
    1
  20. So called "extr eme rig ht w ing" i.e. Ana rcho-Capit alism hasn't even been a thing yet ... nor has commu nism for that matter. However the latter is certainly worse, since it's based on collectivism and soci alism, just like Naz ism was.
    1