Comments by "Historia, Magistra Vitae" (@Historia.Magistra.Vitae.) on "Goebbels: Master of Propaganda Documentary" video.

@PeopleProfiles : National so ciali sts were politi cally authorit arian/totalit arian fa r-le ft. You cannot be a so ciali st and a rig ht win ger at the same time.
3
@F.JuanPhan : Mo nar chy doesn't belong to the rig ht side on the political spectrum ... right side is advocating for de centrali zed pow er, while mon archy is just a form of dictato rship with central ized power.
1
@Mike Fay "Hitle ris m and At tila the H un is ri ght wi ng. M arx Len in and Trot sky is le ft wi ng." Hi tler wa s a so cial ist and not that far aw ay from m arxi sm, which he also was a propo nent of during 1919.
1
@davidparker527 : "Hi tler wasn’t a socia list " Incorrect. He opposed lib eral capit alism, but also international s ocialis m, hence the concept of a “third way,” his cen tralized eco nomic policies obeyed colle ctivist and socialist principles, openly oppos ing capit alism and the free ma rket, favo ring nationa lism and auta rchy. "The Revolution we have made is not a national revolution, but a Nati onal-Socia list Revolution. We would even underline this last word, "Soci alist." — Ad olf Hit ler, Attributed by Winston Churchill in Vol. 1 of The Sec ond World W ar. (1948)
1
@davidparker527 : "Hit ler believed in the national peoples community (Volksgemeinschaft) and based it on race, not class struggle." Correct, because he wasn't a mar xist and m arxis m is not a synonym for so ciali sm. Marx ism, just like fasc ism and nazi sm are different branches of soci alism.
1