Comments by "Historia, Magistra Vitae" (@Historia.Magistra.Vitae.) on "I'm Antifa. Ask Me Anything" video.

Turning to crime is a culture and parenting issue. It's not an issue of capitalism.
2
@moha-tk5gz "Fascism means palingenetic-ultranationalism. " Wrong. While fascism could be called "palingenetic ultranationalism", that is just half the truth. Fascism was also based on collectivism, statism, national syndicalism and socialism. It was an ideology which rejected individualism, capitalism, liberalism/democracy, and marxism. In which the means of production was organized by national worker syndicals (i.e. trade unions), and the guiding philosophy of the state was Actual Idealism. It was revolutionary socialism. The idea was that society would be consolidated (i.e., incorporated) into syndicates (in the Italian context, fascio/fasci) which would be regulated by and serve as organs for the state, or "embody" the state (corpus = body). The purpose was the centralization and synchronization of society under the state, as an end unto itself. To quote Mussolini's infamous aphorism: "All within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state."
2
@moha-tk5gz "Na z ism is a form of fa scism, thus it's fas cism." Wrong. There are no "forms of fasc ism". Na zi sm was National Soci alism and fasc ism was fasc ism. They were two completely separate social ist ideologies, practiced in two completely different countries and formulated by completely different people. There is a reason why they have different names, symbols and origins. Not to mention, that chronologically naz ism cannot be a "form of fasci sm" when Hitl er wrote the dogma for his ideology few years before Mus solini and Giov anni Gen tile. Na z ism = Ge rman National Soci alism Fas cism = Ital ian nationalist synd icalism
2
Actually they are just marxists.
1
@Maksie0 : There is no such exploitation in Capitalism, and there are no classes in the first place. Nobody is forcing those workers to work in the first place, and they could become entrepreneurs if they feel that they are being "exploited".
1
@Maksie0 "Those workers are forced to work because the alternative is homelessness, starvation, medical debt, etc." It is not the fault of the system that people lack survival and agricultural skills. Again, nobody is pointing a gun at workers and forcing them to work. That's not how Capitalism works. Those workers will go and sign a job contract willingly or not at all. It's their choice and their choice alone, even to the detriment of their well being.
1
@Maksie0 "And we can't all be entrepreneurs, because those entrepreneurs all need workers to exploit." Excuses, excuses, excuses. Again, there is no such exploitation, and nobody is forcing you to hire workers as an entrepreneur in the first place. Not to mention, worker co-ops exist.
1
@johncaze757 : I mean that since under capitalism anyone can be an entrepreneur, words such as "proletarian" and "bourgeoisie" have no meaning.
1
They are just dirty marxists. They would feel like home in Cuba.
1