Comments by "Historia, Magistra Vitae" (@Historia.Magistra.Vitae.) on "Asmongold Clips" channel.

@IncognitoActivado : No. Commiefornia.
81
.... except succubi are meant to be hot.
6
@emanuel81111 "imagine saying "we the people never asked to be involved in ww2" if USA didnt join ww2 germany would be the size of 2 continent." If the USA wouldn't have joined the WW1 and steamrolled the opposition to make the 'Treaty of Versailles' possible with its demands, most likely there would have never been a WW2.
5
except that is the opposite of Far-right.
3
@samuellanghus1455 : Not serious, more like Dad joke.
2
@IncognitoActivado : Nope. Nothing to do with Liberalism.
2
@IncognitoActivado : Try again what? You people have no clue what Liberalism even means.
2
@IncognitoActivado : You can start by figuring out who John Locke was. What you Americans mistakenly call "libertarianism" is actually Liberalism... and it has nothing to do with your American progressive Left.
2
@IncognitoActivado : Liberalism is more than economic stuff. It's a political ideology and philosophy.
2
 @IncognitoActivado : Again, Liberalism is more than just economics. It's a political ideology and philosophy first and foremost. Go read some history.
2
"Not all bears attack people or eat people." Well if you are allowed to pick what type of bear, then obviously the safest bet would be a Teddy bear.
1
Make her watch "Repo! The Genetic Opera" , problem solved.
1
The safest bear is a Teddy bear.
1
She was cute and just fine for the Yasmin role... still waiting for the show to bring Yennefer into the story but I guess they won't do it now. In fact, still waiting for Triss also.
1
I guess Reagan learned nothing then. You see if you Americans would have stayed out from the WW1, there would have never been any kind of steamrolling and imposing of the 'Treaty of Versailles' on Germany. Most likely there would have never been a WW2 in the first place as annihilating the German economy was the biggest catalyst for the NSDAP to rise.
1
"statistically, they are more dangerous than a bear." Wrong. You are comparing the absolute best case scenario with a bear vs the worst case scenario with a man, as opposed to reality. Reality is that in 10 bears, 5 of them will attack if they are hungry or protecting their cubs. You walk past 100s of men every day who do absolutely nothing to you. Statistically, men are far safer than bears.
1
"There are like 40 bear attacks a year and like a million murder cases." Because people live in cities with other people, and not in a bear infested forest. False dichotomy.
1
"As a man, I would choose to be stuck in a forest with a bear too. "People" are way scarier than wild animals ... And I would pick a bear every time.." With all due respect, you are an idiot. Even in the worst case scenario, at least you could fight and fend off the people... not so much with a wild bear, which would be a certain death.
1
@Absts4ct "But we're talking about a Man who trying to survive in a forest. people can be hungry too." People would have to be really desperate to resort to cannibalism, and that is not somehow exclusive to men. Regardless, your chances at survival is better with two persons than just alone.
1
@Absts4ct "You're stuck in a forest with a man or a bear. Not you're stuck in a forest with a bear or share a train car with a man." Your best chances at survival is with the man, not with a bear.
1
@Absts4ct "there are no rule that you can't use a gun. " So what exactly is the problem here then? The woman in the woods could also carry a gun then, to deter both the bear and the man.
1
@Absts4ct : But maybe the woman has a tank, or a nuke... after all, "there are no rule that you can't use X" or "insert another move-the-goalpost" excuse.
1
@Absts4ct "You are the one who got lost and moved the goalpost the whole conversation." Nope. It was you who mentioned guns when the question was simply about being stuck with either a bear or with a man... but if you have a gun, then it doesn't matter with whom you are stuck with since you can just shoot your way out from any bad situation. If the man also has a gun then it becomes a question of which one is the better shooter and congratulations, you have successfully derailed the whole conversation.
1
@mr.meatsoup5639 : While Na zism indeed had far-left, soci alist roots, it is impossible to go "far left until you become far right". They are the polar opposites after all.
1