General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Historia, Magistra Vitae
Katie Halper
comments
Comments by "Historia, Magistra Vitae" (@Historia.Magistra.Vitae.) on "Italy's New Fascist Prime Minister" video.
Fa sci sm is not a thing anymore and when it was a thing dur ing the W W2, they were soc ial is ts.
3
@Banks of Barcelona: Ex ce pt that is not what fa sc is m was and what M uss oli ni said. Read again. Also com m unis m and ri ght wi ng are the polar opposite.
2
@PresidentJesus : Incorrect. Fa scis m opposed the ruling class. Fa sci sm opposed cap ital ism. Fa sc ism opposed class struggle. Fas ci sm was pro proletariat. Fa scis m was so ciali sm. Fas cis m was class collaboration.
1
@Amadeus8484 : Italian fas ci sm has not be en a thi ng since the W W 2.
1
@djangokill65: Except fa s cis m opposed cap itali sm.
1
@PutXi_Whipped : Yup. Go read history.
1
@Amadeus: Save? Fa sc is m opposed ca pita lis m and Mu ssol ini was stri ctly against it, and the bou rgeo isie in general.
1
@Amadeus8484 : Fa scis t corporatism was class collaboration between the proletariat and the nationalized businesses. It was a system which tried to bring together federations of workers and employers syndicates belonging to the same profession and branch, to regulate production in a holistic manner. Each trade union would theoretically represent its professional concerns, especially by negotiation of labour contracts and the like. It was theorized that this method could result in harmony amongst social classes. What you seem to be referring to is called corporatocracy and it's a completely different thing and has nothing to do with this subject.
1
@Amadeus8484 : They certainly had more say under the fa sci st regime than under Le nin and Sta lin in the US SR. The Italian fas ci st corp orat ism was about collectively managing the economy with employers, workers and state officials by formal mechanisms at the national level. Its supporters claimed that corporatism could better recognize or "incorporate" every divergent interest into the state "organically", unlike majority-rules democracy which they said could marginalize specific interests. This total consideration was the inspiration for their use of the term "totalitarian", described without coercion (which is connoted in the modern meaning) in the 1932 'Doctrine of Fa scis m' as thus:
1
"When brought within the orbit of the State, Fa sci sm recognizes the real needs which gave rise to so cia li sm and trade unionism, giving them due weight in the guild or corporative system in which divergent interests are coordinated and harmonized in the unity of the State ... [The state] is not simply a mechanism which limits the sphere of the supposed liberties of the individual... Neither has the Fa sc ist conception of authority anything in common with that of a police ridden State... Far from crushing the individual, the Fas ci st State multiplies his energies, just as in a regiment a soldier is not diminished but multiplied by the number of his fellow soldiers."
1
@Red Horizon : Incorrect. Fas cis m serves so cia lis m and it opposed ca pita lis m.
1
@EspirituTranquilo: There is no such thing as "rig ht-wi ng fa scis m" since it was a so cial ist ideology.
1