Comments by "Historia, Magistra Vitae" (@Historia.Magistra.Vitae.) on "Tucker Carlson Trips Over Himself To Defend Fascism On-Air" video.

@raizenr2387 : It was a form of (sta te) s o ci al is m. You are welcome.
1
@Charles Andrews: You cannot promote something that is not a thing any more and has not been a thing sin ce the W W 2.
1
@charlesandrews2360 : Both na zis m and fa sci sm ended after W W2.
1
@angelfox123456: She is not a so ci al ist, so you are wrong.
1
@Enrique ♡ : You can only get to ta lit ar ia nis m through so ci al i s m, via e xtre me col lec tivi sm where the family and its values are replaced by the go ve rn m en t.
1
@toecutterjones : Incorrect. Fa sc is m was a form of (state) so cia lis m and Benito was a devout so ci ali st. Fa sc ism sits right next to ma rxi sm on the political spectrum.
1
@toecutterjones : Collectivism, centralized / planned economy, state control of the means of production and economy in general and nationalization of businesses for starters.
1
@The One : Fa scis m does not exist anymore.
1
@jaaz81 : Fa sc is m is not a thing.
1
Where did Tu ck er de fe nd s o ci ali s m exactly?
1
@tomtheeagle1 : What does it have to do with my question exactly?
1
@greggarsenault4457 : Yes, it is in the fa scis m which was a branch of so cia lis m.
1
@tomtheeagle1 And I asked where did he d efe nd that s o ci a li sm.
1
@tomtheeagle1 : Nat ional soc ia lis m and fa scis m are 2 completely different so ci ali st ideologies practiced in 2 different countries. Go read some history before you continue posting nonsense.
1
@greggarsenault4457 : You are wrong. It was a political and economic system that rejected capitalism, liberalism/democracy, and com muni sm, in which the means of production were organized by national worker syndicals (i.e. trade unions), and the guiding philosophy of the state was Actual Idealism. It was one of the branches of so cia lis m. Go read some hist ory alrea dy and stop po sting nonse nse.
1
@greggarsenault4457 : Ma rxi sm cared about the working class, while so cia lis m does not make such distinction, and advocates for collective ownership or control of the means of production. Fa sci sm indeed believed in the nationalization of the unions, which is what the le ft-win g does best. The fundamental differences between lef t-wing and rig ht-wing ideologies center around the the rights of individuals vs. the power of the government. L eft-wi ng beliefs are liberal in that they believe society is best served with an expanded role for the government. People on the right believe that the best outcome for society is achieved when individual rights and civil liberties are paramount and the role — and especially the power — of the government is minimized. Ben ito didn't want people to be obedient to him. He wanted people, businesses, economy, everything to be obedient to the state, hence his motto "All within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state."
1
@greggarsenault4457 : Ben ito was merely the Prime Minister and head of the 'Fa sci st Grand Council' from which he later got democratically voted out. He wasn't as powerful as people think he was... not only that, he had to collaborate with the pope and he had to bend the knee to the King of Italy still.
1