Comments by "Historia, Magistra Vitae" (@Historia.Magistra.Vitae.) on "Biographics" channel.

Reminder that Ad olf was a na tion al soc iali st, not a fa sc ist. Both nat ion al so ciali sm and fa sci sm are 2 different soc ial ist ideologies.
4
@Eddie Johnson: Fas cis m has always been f ar le ft, tot alitari an soc ialis m. Also the Na zi s were Na tio nal so ciali sts, not fa scis ts. Nati onal so cialis m was also a form of to talita rian soc ialis m. It's just am uri ca n left is ts who are defl ecting and trying to deny history.
2
"So Socialism wasn’t the evil it’s portrayed to be after all. " Wrong. It was. After all, Fascism was a totalitarian far-left, socialist ideology based on National Syndicalism adapted from Georges Sorel. Fascism, as created by Mussolini and Giovanni Gentile, comes from a belief that the "Stateless and Classless society" Communism calls for after its dictatorship cannot achieve Socialism, and that only the State can properly organize a Socialist Society.
2
"ultra right-winged nationalism. " There is no such thing. Nationalism is devotion to the State which sees all other states as inferior and in competition. Right wing ideologies do not embrace Nationalism, but rather Patriotism. In all Right wing ideologies, the Individual is superior to the State. In Socialist ideologies the collective (such as the State) is superior to the individual.
2
@m.r4841 : He certainly was, a proud nat ional soci alist. Go read some history.
2
@edwardbateman3094 : N azis m and fa scis m are 2 different things though.
1
@edwardbateman3094 : No. Fa scis m is fa scis m, Nati onal soci alis m is nat ion al so ciali sm. 2 different so ciali st ideologies, practiced in 2 different countries and founded by different people. Germany had nat ional socia lism. Italy had fas cism.
1
@Lucas Troesh : N atio nal soc ialis m has not been a thing since the ww2, hun.
1
Ron P : They certainly are.
1
@rivkacohen: Fa sc ists were not anti semi tic. Nati onal so ciali sts were.
1
@Atomic Fairy: That boy is a l eft ist, not lib ertar ian.
1
@mylerwilson4879 : F ascis m was tot alitar ian soci alism though.
1
@Alle Warten Auf Mich : Na zis were na tion al so cialis ts to be precise.
1
@Alle Warten Auf Mich : Again, they were so cia lists.
1
Joseph Goebbels : It was a form of t otalita rian soci alis m, so technically fa r le ft.
1
@Troy Staunton: Nat ional so cial ists certainly were f ar le ft so cial ists and Ad olf was proud of it. Go read some history, kiddo.
1
@tefky7964 : What definition? This is politics 101.
1
@tefky7964 "Also right wing has been always associated with rules and hierarchies, which aren´t exactly synonyms of individualism." That was before the French revolution. When it comes to modern day politics, the fundamental differences between left-wing and right-wing ideologies center around the the rights of individuals vs. the power of the government. Left-wing beliefs are based on the idea that society is best served with an expanded role for the government. People on the right believe that the best outcome for society is achieved when individual rights and civil liberties are paramount and the role — and especially the power — of the government is minimized.
1
@mylerwilson4879 : Technically ana rchis m resides outside the compass ... but if we would have to put it in, it would be extre me rig ht, after lib erta riani sm and mi narch ism.
1
@mylerwilson4879 : Actually an arc ho-ca pit alis m is the only form of an archi sm. Others are just various forms of co m m uni sm.
1
You did. You were always a socialist.
1
@m.r4841 : Nati onal soc ialis m was a form of to tali tari an so cia lism, just like fas cis m. Both opposed liberal ca pital ism, but also international so ciali sm, hence the concept of a “third way,” their centralized economic policies obeyed collectivist and s ocial ist principles, openly opposing ca pital ism and the free market, favoring nati onal ism and auta rchy.
1
@Luca Goodoer : They were so ciali sts because of their political, economic and social policies, hun. And Ad olf was proud of it.
1
@turnmeondeadman4221 : Fa sci sm is fasc is m is FA SCI SM. Makes no difference how you write it. There was only one fa sci st movement, lead by Mussolini.
1
Na zi Germ any was Nat ion al socia lis t, not fa sci st. Both are 2 different so cial ist ideologies.
1