Comments by "Historia, Magistra Vitae" (@Historia.Magistra.Vitae.) on "Sen. Kevin Cramer on Donald Trump pressuring Georgia election officials: 'I don't find the offense'" video.

  1. @OliverDePlace: Recounts are useless without the full audit, since recounting the same possible tainted votes is just a waste of time.
    3
  2. @Kimberly Wertz: There was no "extortion". Wake up, sheep.
    3
  3.  @OliverDePlace  : They do exist, which is why Trump told them to find those votes. Trump did not tell them to fabricate votes lmao.
    2
  4. @Joe Marcus: Trump didn't ask GA to fabricate votes. Try again.
    1
  5.  @jrmarcus  : By throwing out all the illegal votes. Recounting is useless without an audit, which has not taken place in GA as of yet ... so the fact that GA counted possible tainted votes for 3 times is just meaningless.
    1
  6.  @jrmarcus  : No faith needed. Nobody knows the facts when your democRats are fighting for tooth and nail to keep the election less transparent and fair as possible. If they wouldn't have anything to hide, we wouldn't be here to discuss about this mess now in the first place...
    1
  7.  @jrmarcus  : The difference is that there was an investigation granted to the democRats, while now people are not giving Trump the same right. Trump has only 3 or 4 official court cases, but pretty much all of them have been dismissed due to procedural grounds i.e. the courts do not want to get involved and uncover the truth.
    1
  8. @judy britt: You american had no free & fair elections. That's why we are still discussing it. If it were fair and free, people would have taken all the accusations seriously and done a proper investigation. :)
    1
  9. @Roshai Moore: By throwing out illegal votes.
    1
  10. @Charles Brewer: You have no clue what you are talking about, sheep. There is distrust in your process because your democRats are fighting tooth and nail to keep the election as less transparent and fair as possible. Also Trump and his team have already presented plenty of evidence and proof, but your biased courts do not want to get involved ... which is why he has been dismissed due to procedural grounds every time.
    1
  11.  @charlesbrewer6552  : Nope.
    1
  12. @Carol P: You have no clue what you are talking about, sheep. There is plenty of evidence to support the notion of fraud. Supreme court dismissed the case due to lack of standing, not lack of evidence or merit.
    1
  13. @Jocasta Nu: No evidence has been thrown out since none of the courts have even given them a proper hearing and a chance to present evidence in the first place. Wake up, sheep.
    1
  14.  @jocastanu1047  : There is no conspiracy. Your american courts are biased and do not want to get involved, which is why all the Trump's cases have been dismissed due to procedural grounds.
    1
  15.  @TheMrZombified  : Nope. Sheep.
    1
  16.  @brahmburgers  : You already have an ultra fascist party ... it's called the radical left.
    1
  17.  @raydehn5565  : Nope. Should be done by a bipartisan 3rd party.... or even the army for crying out loud.
    1
  18.  @raydehn5565  : Tell that to your radical leftists (groups like Burn Loot Murder and antifa) who are threatening the opposing political party with violence and trying to "put them onto a list" and trying to cancel and persecute them only because they support Trump. Those are one of the many things that occur within fascism. :)
    1
  19.  @OliverDePlace  : You have no clue what you are talking about, sheep.
    1
  20. @madfoot: Because there was no crime, sheep.
    1
  21. @Aaron Powers: Wrong. No evidence has been "thrown out" because they have not even allowed to present any evidence in the first place. They are not even allowed to have a proper hearing. When it comes to recounting, it's completely useless if a full audit is not done alongside it.
    1
  22. Obi Juan: Do you dumb dumb realize that the call was part of a lawsuit settlement discussion? Maybe you should listen the whole call before commenting.
    1
  23.  @obijuan3004  : You have no clue what you are talking about.
    1
  24.  @obijuan3004  : You can keep being in denial all you want, but it was an official lawsuit settlement call. Please go and educate yourself about this subject before commenting.
    1
  25.  @obijuan3004  : Again, you are being in denial. Trump never asked them to fabricate votes for him. Please go and educate yourself about this subject before commenting.
    1
  26. @Frodo Teabaggings: Trump has not even been allowed to present proof in court since he has been dismissed due to procedural grounds every time. Wake up, sheep.
    1
  27.  @frodoteabaggings5234  : Again, Trump's team has not given a chance in court as of yet. Please, go and educate yourself about this subject before commenting.
    1
  28. @Hekat Sees: The call was normal and there was nothing wrong with it. You do realize that the call was part of a lawsuit settlement discussion? Stop being a dumb dumb.
    1
  29.  @hekatsees9449  : You have no clue what you are talking about.
    1
  30. @Marco Akara: Nope.
    1
  31. @Neil Cates: How about a full and proper audit this time? No need to count anything before that.
    1
  32.  @jaredkelly4866  : That's up to the GA election laws buddy. For example no signature? Throw it out. No chain of custody? Throw it out.
    1
  33.  @brahmburgers  : You have no clue what you are talking about, sheep. There is no "coup" and never will be.
    1
  34. @Judith Osorio: Wrong. You have no clue what you are talking about, sheep.
    1
  35. @Marc Weisi: Nobody is arguing that states shouldn’t be deciding how to run their own elections. People are only pointing out the simple fact, that some states decided to run their election differently without the agreement of their state legislature, which is a constitutional violation.
    1
  36. @matt k. : Hey dumb dumb, you do realize that the call was part of a lawsuit settlement discussion? Trump wasn't pleading or trying to "influence" anything.
    1
  37. What is #45?
    1
  38. @Bumpa Halifax: You have no clue what you are talking about, sheep. Evidence exists and has been put forth by Trump's team. None of the courts are currently willing to look at the evidence since they are dismissing Trump's cases due to procedural grounds. Trump hasn't been allowed to present any evidence in court to this date. Wake up, sheep.
    1
  39.  @bumpahalifax7821  : You just have no clue what you are talking about buddy.
    1
  40. @long bow: Maybe people won't accept the election as it stands simply because it was a shady mess? Even we europeans can see that. :) , nothing wrong with wanting a fair and transparent election.
    1
  41.  @longbow5423  : You are so clueless. Literally multiple states in your country violated their own constitution by changing their election laws willy nilly and without the consent of their own state legislature. All of your biased courts have washed their hands of this and do not want to get involved, which is why all Trump's cases have been dismissed due to procedural grounds. Recounts are completely useless unless a proper audit is done alongside with them. Winning the popular vote means very little in your election, just ask Hillary. Certain key states matter ... and it just so happens that all the shady things happened in those very key/battleground states.
    1
  42. @hon liong: Do you dumb dumbs not understand that this call was part of an official lawsuit settlement? There was nothing wrong with the call whatsoever.
    1
  43. @UltimateVenom Gaming: There is distrust in your process because your democRats are fighting tooth and nail to keep the election as less transparent and fair as possible. Also Trump and his team has already presented plenty of evidence and proof, but your biased courts do not want to get involved ... which is why he has been dismissed due to procedural grounds every time.
    1
  44.  @ultimate-venom-games  : Here in europe, we don't have rePublican cool aid, sheep. Everybody knows that the courts are against Trump. Literally none of the courts are willing to pick up Trump's cases and are doing their hardest to not get involved.
    1
  45. @Christopher Thorn: You have no clue what you are talking about.... you do realize that the call was part of a lawsuit settlement discussion? Stop being a dumb dumb.
    1
  46. @Andrew Sep: Wrong. GA did not do an audit. Also nothing has been "debunked" as of yet. Wake up, sheep.
    1
  47.  @tdrewman  : Let me remind you that the total amount of votes is rather irrelevant when it comes to winning your election... just ask Hillary. 3 recounts which all were useless because not a single audit was done to verify those votes. Recounting possibly tainted votes is just a waste of time. Also Trump has been one of the best presidents the america has had in decades lmao ... just go and read some statistics and economics.
    1
  48. Would like to point out that nothing has been "debunked" as of yet.
    1
  49. @Debbie Melchor: Wrong. There is evidence, but the court have threw them out due to procedural grounds since they are biased and don't want to get involved.
    1
  50. @rimrock53: You have no clue what you are talking about.... you do realize that the call was part of a lawsuit settlement discussion? Stop being a dumb dumb.
    1
  51. @Simon Higgs: You have no clue what you are talking about, sheep. There is plenty of evidence to support the notion of fraud. None of the courts have listened Trump. They have repeatedly dismissed him due to procedural grounds. Please go and educate yourself about this subject before commenting.
    1
  52. @Tony Pierce: "Finding" these votes means getting rid of the fraudulent votes in Trump's eyes.
    1