Comments by "Historia, Magistra Vitae" (@Historia.Magistra.Vitae.) on "Why Doesn't Socialist Pakman Move to Venezuela?" video.

@303TAG303: Fa s cis m has not been a thing since the ww2 Italy, hun.
1
@303TAG303 : Well no.
1
@Dan S. : Fas cis m has not been a thing since the ww2 Italy ... also fas ci st s and republicans are literally at the opposite sides of the political spectrum. Co pe harder.
1
@Jerry Callender : Here is a sane, rational or logical argument: S ociali sm always leads to to talit arian ism, since ce ntraliz ed / planned economy and so cializa tion in general doesn't work otherwise.
1
@Fredric Henning : Fa sc is m has not been a thing since the ww2 It aly, hun.
1
@the slunch: ehh... that's some ironic statement, considering fa sc ist s were tot alit ari an soci alis ts.
1
@Official Garbage: China still ... and N az i Germany wasn't fa scis t, it was na tion al soc iali st. Italy had fas ci sm.
1
@puzzley6613 : Woke pedia is wrong then. Na zis m was Nat ional so cia lism. Nobody here in Europe called Na zis as fas cis ts. Nobody in the fa sc ist Italy called Na zis as fa scis ts. Even the Na z is themselves never called themselves as fa scis ts. They were 2 different tot alitar ian soci ali st ideologies practiced in 2 different countries back in the day. Also the founders of the ideologies are different. China is also not a com mun ist country ... a soc iali st (Mar xist) country, yes, with a mixed economy now that they have embraced capit alism like the past 3 decades.
1
@puzzley6613 : I don't, but history does.
1
@tyronesoares3268 : Fa sc ists were fa r le ft so cial ists, just fyi
1
@bfkc111 : There is no such thing as "rig ht-wi ng fa sci st" ... fa sci sts were f ar le ft soc iali sts.
1
@Dan R : Fa scis m has no been a thing since the ww2 Italy, hun. Co pe harder.
1
@ Sarge 420: So you are for what mod ern Chi na is doing right now?
1