Comments by "Historia, Magistra Vitae" (@Historia.Magistra.Vitae.) on "How the US could become fascist" video.

Reminder that fasc ism was a totalitarian far-left, soc ialist ideology based on national syndicalism. It hasn't existed since the W W2. Your country will never become fas cist.
2
"Well an early definition of fas cism deals with the idea of when the government is controlled by corporations." That is actually the definition of Corporatocracy, which is a completely different thing than fasc ism, which didn't work that way.
2
" Fasc ism is a partnership between government and big companies being used for government initiatives for control and military." Actually no. In fasc ism, there was no such partnership. There was only the government. What you are referring to is called Corporatocracy, which is a different thing.
2
""Fas cism should more appropriately be called Corpor atism as it is the merger of Cor porate and State power." Benito Mus solini" Except Mussolini has never said such a thing. Common misquote. There was no merger. There was only State power.
1
@view1st : There was no business corporations nor private capitalist power in fas cism. Fa scism was a totalitarian far-left, socia list ideology based on national syndicalism, where everyone and everything were subju gated under the goals and directives set by the State. It was State power only.
1
@ronelkins1057 : There is no fourteen in the first place.
1
You am uric ans have no clue what fasci sm even means nor what it represented. Stop using words that you do not understand. It's embarrassing.
1
@ilgattopazzerello : Nope.
1
"They've even revised world history and made the rise of Nazi sm a result of far-Left social ism" Wrong. Na zism was a tota litarian far-left, socia list ideology based on ethnonationalism. This is basic W W2 history. You cannot be an advocate for centralized planning and strong government controls without being a soc ialist. That's what made Hi tler a soci alist. He may have been right of the Bolsheviks, but he was still a socialist leftist as he believed in strong central government control. Hit ler outright declared himself a socia list in Mein Kampf, just not the Mar xist international or full Soviet type. He struggled with HOW to distinguish his sociali sm from the rest of the Ma rxist crowd. You amur icans are being del usional and have no clue what you are talking about.
1
Wrong. Fascis m was social ism which opposed capitalism.
1