Comments by "" (@Cloud_Seeker) on "Analyzing a modern fascist book "Socialism of Duty"" video.

  1. TIK. I do not agree with that "Communists only pretend to seek material prosperity". No matter where we look, we always see Socialists hyper fixated on material prosperity. If you look any socialist nation they always treat problems as if it is a material problem. Look at Sweden today. Instead of understanding that the issues with gang violence and so on are caused by cultural difference and different belief systems. The Left Wing has for decades treated it as a material prosperity issue. That if they only throw enough money to the "less well off" they will start acting more like normal Sweds and become productive members of society. They think that if they can only socially engineer people, they will make the society better. Communists and Socialists always focus on material prosperity. They only pretend they will do it for the sake of the "people". The reality however is that they seek it in order to enrich themselves.
    2
  2.  @fakeorchestra4260  I very much doubt that those that just work for "bettering the world" will survive very long in power. A honest politician will not survive as they will be a threat to everyone else. Just like a competent politician is a threat to all politicians who are corrupt. I also do not believe that you will have spiritual politicians in power for long. People that work for some kind of religion is a threat for the same reason people that work for a better world is a threat. If what needs to be done to achieve and regain power goes against their beliefs, they will not play ball. What do you think will happen is a ideologically driven politician encounters a fairly large corruption scandal has taken place by his own colleagues? Will the politician sacrifice political power by damaging his own political party by taking down the corruption? Or will it be handled internally, covered up and dismissed? What do you think those who are involved in the corruption scandal will react if the politican has decided to take action against them? Remember that the other side also always get a say.
    1