Comments by "" (@adambickford8720) on "Core Dumped" channel.

  1.  @ArneChristianRosenfeldt  I think his point was we didn't decide to build a binary counter, it's just kind of the unexpected result of this aggregation of flip-flops. It obviously wasn't a coincidence for the designer and much iteration arrived at this elegant solution.
    18
  2. Turns out even OS threads can be too expensive. For example, Java's virtual threads multiplex onto OS threads.
    1
  3. These videos are for the freshman level learner. Let them enjoy their ideal diodes for a couple years.
    1
  4. Google cooperative vs pre-emptive multitasking. You're solving different problems.
    1
  5.  @homomorphic  So you don't understand the topic. (also, it's "you're") How well do you suppose cooperative multitasking works on a consumer OS where the code is written by competing vendors? Think real hard at what chrome would do if it wasn't forced to yield the CPU. Efficiency is but one factor of thousands. Critical thinking is more important than google.
    1
  6.  @homomorphic  Arrogance suits you well.
    1
  7. Yes, but its not 1:1 w/switches to keys. There's a reason most keyboards can only register a small number of simultaneous key presses (multiplexing).
    1
  8. So that feeling my degree was being taught by hacks is true :(
    1
  9. Threads are usually an OS construct.
    1
  10. There's also a cost to switching the active thread. With enough threads you spend more cpu time scheduling work than working.
    1
  11. Videos like this are why i tolerate the internet
    1
  12. Not only can you scale infinitely, but you have to in order to solve any nontrivial problem!
    1