Comments by "Ptolémée Sélénion" (@ptolemeeselenion1542) on "hochelaga"
channel.
-
8
-
@Noam Oks It rather seems like two given names to the Phoenician towns of Sarepta (near present-day Sarafand, Lebanon) and Seraphad. Or of Sardis in ancient Lydia, and the Phoenician Seraphad once more.
There has no archeological evidence of Hebraic presence in ancient Iberia prior the 1st century BCE, and even if there had any Israelite exiles in Sefardi "The Peninsula/Island of Wails or Wrongdoing or Peace or Fairness" (from Phoenician/Punic ʾiy šapan "Land of Hyrazes" or Middle or Late Egyptian xrwsẖ-jtrw-msjwy/Kheru-uasekh Iteru Sedjawy "Broad Island-Tip/Island-Cape between two courses of water/Peninsula of the Vascalones or of Iberians or of Hounds or of Jackals or of Mouses/Rabbits or of the Unfair or of the Wrongdong or of the Justified or of Peace Brought or of a Ram's horn made into a trumpet") , this could likely had occured during the days of Ahab or much later on. I don't see why people would've been exiled in a some far flung Punic colony during the legendary reign of Solomon, unless he sought some economic opportunities in sea trading.
Whom to the Gauls, there has no mention in Punic records about the region being called ys sfr "Island of Sardis or Serapta". The only mention about a far-flung land with such naming was Sardinia in Italy, whose Phoenician legends claims that its civilization has been founded by a Lydian princess natime from Sardis, the capital of Lydia. Historically, it was the birthland of a Pelasgian civilization known as the Noragic Civilization, and its inhabitants the Sherden amid the account of the Peoples of the Sea by ancient Egyptians.
Etymologically speaking, Tzafar the land better fits ancient Sardinia, given that the naming may refers to a tower or a set of fortifications pushed back in some Indo-European languages or to a tuft of woman's hair in both Egyptian and Semitic languages. The Sherden/Nuragic Sardinians were a mix of early Neolithic European farmers - e.g. the mixed Proto-Afro-Asiatic, Neolithic West Eurasian & Natufian descended early "Proto-Japhetites" , "Anatolian Proto-Graeco-Thracians" , "Proto-Pelasgians" or "Sethians/Typhonians" (the descendants of an offshoot of Proto-Afro-Asiatics who followed Sutekh/Set in prehistoric time and had been driven away or exiled of the African continent by Horus and his followers, fleeing the wrath of the vengeful victorious God far into Asia and the islands of the Aegean Sea, some 12,000 to 9,000 years ago, according Egyptian mythology) native from Anatolia who mixed with later migrations of Beaker Culture descended migrants from Northwestern and Central Europe - e.g. Neolithic Iberians - and were pretty close genetically from the remains of the ancient Southern European man dubbed "Otzï the Iceman" whose remains has been found in the Italian Alps.
It seems more plausible to me that the "Island of Zarephath" was Sardinia, rather than Gaul and the western to northern and central areas of the Celtic World far away from their Scythian, Thracian and Dacian homelands into the Balkans and Ukraine, and that for some obscure reasons, the denomination has changed to describe France in medieval times because of:
1) its proximity to the Iberic Peninsula;
And 2) Because of accounts and traditions that persisted in Roman and later on medieval and early modern times about Canaanite/Phoenician colonists who settled in Punic times into Southern Germany and Bavaria in Austria, as well as the Lowlands and some regions of the Britannic Isles-- alongside some Hebrews who followed them. It is indeed now proven that some admixtures of Iron Age Levantine DNA specific to the Phoenicians stills persists nowadays in high flux amongst Southern Germans, Bavarians, some of the Dutch, South English people and some Scot-Pictish populations. Besides, the Phoenician colony of Massalia in Gaul, as well as the Phoenician colonies in Bavaria were better famed than the Punic colonies of Noragic Sardinia.
5
-
1
-
@0:45 "It's a horrifyiing statistic, especially compared to Satan who has measly ten ."
Measly ten direct deletions, indeed. The Bible imputs him most, if not arguably most absolutely anything WRONG in Creation. It's far more than just a measly ten, according these myrhologies.
@1:24 "This violent depiction of [the Biblical God] is so different from the peaceful God of the New Testament."
You mean, the same one who was supposed to unleash the Apocalypse at the end of times? Literal stars falling out the skies and engulfing the entire earth in flames, beastly titans surging forth the sea and descending from heaven to rule tyranously over humankind, wars, plagues, droughts, climactic disasters, large rivers drying up, earth-shattering seismic upheavals, false prophets, entire societies and civilizations crumbling down the very family core, cats smashing dogs's cheeks, an Aphrodite-like figurative Jezebel ahead of a global spanning religion, floods, the soil opening beneath anyone's feet, the universe falling apart-- and as if that is not sufficient, at some point a corrupted eldritch cosmic being with a tremendous slew of godlike powers meant to be the most powerful and handesomest of his kind, might be released from his chains and deliver a cataclysmic cosmic war on EARTH. TWICE EFFING OVER. Knowing that the last time he waged war, half of the imperishable stars in the firmament EXTINGUISHED at the very dawn of Creation, and so does the hosts of angels and Children of Elohim alike.
And oh, if you don't recognize some random rabbi as your Lord and Savior and the only Way to Truth and Life, then no matter how virtuous you are or not, your soul will be doomed to oblivion. Not Hell nor Abraham's Bosom: oblivion. The ones who will repents, already did and remained gonna all d%e anyway in the most gruesome horrible manners just after they have been ressurected, just so they might hope to get ressurected a second time and live forevermore in the New Kingdom of Heaven and Creation (with no guarantee that sin or rebellious servants of God might pop up once more) .
Speak about a peaceful one.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@0:45 "It's a horrifyiing statistic, especially compared to Satan who has measly ten ."
Measly ten direct deletions, indeed. The Bible imputs him most, if not arguably most absolutely anything WRONG in Creation. It's far more than just a measly ten, according these myrhologies.
@1:24 "This violent depiction of [the Biblical God] is so different from the peaceful God of the New Testament."
You mean, the same one who was supposed to unleash the Apocalypse at the end of times? Literal stars falling out the skies and engulfing the entire earth in flames, beastly titans surging forth the sea and descending from heaven to rule tyranously over humankind, wars, plagues, droughts, climactic disasters, large rivers drying up, earth-shattering seismic upheavals, false prophets, entire societies and civilizations crumbling down the very family core, cats smashing dogs's cheeks, an Aphrodite-like figurative Jezebel ahead of a global spanning religion, floods, the soil opening beneath anyone's feet, the universe falling apart-- and as if that is not sufficient, at some point a corrupted eldritch cosmic being with a tremendous slew of godlike powers meant to be the most powerful and handesomest of his kind, might be released from his chains and deliver a cataclysmic cosmic war on EARTH. TWICE EFFING OVER. Knowing that the last time he waged war, half of the imperishable stars in the firmament EXTINGUISHED at the very dawn of Creation, and so does the hosts of angels and Children of Elohim alike.
And oh, if you don't recognize some random rabbi as your Lord and Savior and the only Way to Truth and Life, then no matter how virtuous you are or not, your soul will be doomed to oblivion. Not Hell nor Abraham's Bosom: oblivion. The ones who will repents, already did and remained gonna all d%e anyway in the most gruesome horrible manners just after they have been ressurected, just so they might hope to get ressurected a second time and live forevermore in the New Kingdom of Heaven and Creation (with no guarantee that sin or rebellious servants of God might pop up once more) .
Speak about a peaceful one.
1
-
Ethiopia in the Greek Scriptures in simply a transliteration for the Kingdom of Kush whose territory extended from the border of ancient Upper Egypt to Lower Nubia (present-day Lake Aswan) to the Senaar and Nuba Mountains in northern South Sudan. Not to modern-day Ethiopia which is, in truth Abyssinia. The only time that the Horn of Africa is referred in the Bible is when Ophir and Sheba are mentioned. Ophir was the Hebrew name for the ancient portuary city-State of Opet in modern-day northern Somalia, while Sheba, not to confuse with the Cushitic kingdom of Saba e.g. the lands of Ta-Sety and of the Medjai in Nubia, was the name of a mixed Hamito Semitic, Afro-Arabian kingdom whose territory was spreaded on each bank of the southern end of the Red Sea in Southern Arabia and the northern regiom of the Horn of Arabia.
The Gauls were never explicitly mentioned in the Bible, although some "Japhetic" nations and tribes held vaguely Celtic sounding, Gothic sounding or Proto-Germanic names (even ome proto-Baltic sounding or Proto-Uralic name??) , probably due to the presence of Scythians across the Near East in the Early Iron Age, as well as of Celts and Goths in Thrace and Scythia. Of course, I put "Japhetic" between parenthesis because this seems to describe moreso in general any line of continental Pelasgian, Pre-Hittite/Indo-Hittite speaking (the Neolithic to Early Bronze Age phylum native from Chalcolithic Anatolia that might be ancestral to the later Indo-European phylum) and Indo-Hittite influenced nations ansd tribes, although the Pelasgian part seems dubious given that some of the Pelasgians, Anatolians and Minoans are actually classified as "Hamitic" and of Misraim's lineage by the Bible (ex. : the Lydians being conflated to the Lybians, the Kittim/Creteans, and Phillistines) .
Besides, how did they forgot that the pre-Sinaitic kingdom of Sina in modern-day Southern China (what the ancient Egyptians knew as Šnw-tw "Land of Sheena/Shina" or "land of the Linen Weavers or Silk Weavers or Border-marking Priests", Vedic literature as Çina, and Greek geographer and historian Herodotus as Sina) was also mentioned once in the Old Testament as well??
Otherwise, we also have Sabtechah ("Western Sudan" or modern Central Sahel-Sudanian region in Northern Central Africa, inabited by Central Saharan populations) , Sabtah ("Azania" , formerly much of the land of Punt) , and Phut e.g. the whole of Northern Africa north of the Sahara extending from Marmaica to the foothills of the Atlas Mountains (not to confuse with Punt) . Mentions about India are doubtful are best, due to the fact that the Hebrew name given to the Indus river, Gihon, was exactly the same name given by the latter to a now-extinct ancient Arabian river sourcing from the Arabian portion of the land of the Havilaites in the Hejaz mountains to Bahrein, a dried river now known as Bahrein River, as well as to the freaking Atbara river in the Abyssinian Highlands-- in the African homeland of the Havilaites, while Ophir was equally dubbed as such to a portuary city in ancient India. However, it is mentioned in sime canonical writings that one of the Wise Kings of the New Testement, Gaspar, was native from the East. He was assumed to be mayhaps Persian, but his name was actually a transliteration of the sanskrit Kasyapari for "Cashmir" , a region from Northwest India. Gaspar must have been either an Indo-Mauryan or Indo-Aryan, or an adoption by Christian mythology of an older namesake and superpowered wiseman in Vedic religions, Kashpari.
1
-
1
-
Ethiopia in the Greek Scriptures in simply a transliteration for the Kingdom of Kush whose territory extended from the border of ancient Upper Egypt to Lower Nubia (present-day Lake Aswan) to the Senaar and Nuba Mountains in northern South Sudan. Not to modern-day Ethiopia which is, in truth Abyssinia. The only time that the Horn of Africa is referred in the Bible is when Ophir and Sheba are mentioned. Ophir was the Hebrew name for the ancient portuary city-State of Opet in modern-day northern Somalia, while Sheba, not to confuse with the Cushitic kingdom of Saba e.g. the lands of Ta-Sety and of the Medjai in Nubia, was the name of a mixed Hamito Semitic, Afro-Arabian kingdom whose territory was spreaded on each bank of the southern end of the Red Sea in Southern Arabia and the northern regiom of the Horn of Arabia.
The Gauls were never explicitly mentioned in the Bible, although some "Japhetic" nations and tribes held vaguely Celtic sounding, Gothic sounding or Proto-Germanic names (even ome proto-Baltic sounding or Proto-Uralic name??) , probably due to the presence of Scythians across the Near East in the Early Iron Age, as well as of Celts and Goths in Thrace and Scythia. Of course, I put "Japhetic" between parenthesis because this seems to describe moreso in general any line of continental Pelasgian, Pre-Hittite/Indo-Hittite speaking (the Neolithic to Early Bronze Age phylum native from Chalcolithic Anatolia that might be ancestral to the later Indo-European phylum) and Indo-Hittite influenced nations ansd tribes, although the Pelasgian part seems dubious given that some of the Pelasgians, Anatolians and Minoans are actually classified as "Hamitic" and of Misraim's lineage by the Bible (ex. : the Lydians being conflated to the Lybians, the Kittim/Creteans, and Phillistines) .
Besides, how did they forgot that the pre-Sinaitic kingdom of Sina in modern-day Southern China (what the ancient Egyptians knew as Šnw-tw "Land of Sheena/Shina" or "land of the Linen Weavers or Silk Weavers or Border-marking Priests", Vedic literature as Çina, and Greek geographer and historian Herodotus as Sina) was also mentioned once in the Old Testament as well??
Otherwise, we also have Sabtechah ("Western Sudan" or modern Central Sahel-Sudanian region in Northern Central Africa, inabited by Central Saharan populations) , Sabtah ("Azania" , formerly much of the land of Punt) , and Phut e.g. the whole of Northern Africa north of the Sahara extending from Marmaica to the foothills of the Atlas Mountains (not to confuse with Punt) . Mentions about India are doubtful are best, due to the fact that the Hebrew name given to the Indus river, Gihon, was exactly the same name given by the latter to a now-extinct ancient Arabian river sourcing from the Arabian portion of the land of the Havilaites in the Hejaz mountains to Bahrein, a dried river now known as Bahrein River, as well as to the freaking Atbara river in the Abyssinian Highlands-- in the African homeland of the Havilaites, while Ophir was equally dubbed as such to a portuary city in ancient India. However, it is mentioned in sime canonical writings that one of the Wise Kings of the New Testement, Gaspar, was native from the East. He was assumed to be mayhaps Persian, but his name was actually a transliteration of the sanskrit Kasyapari for "Cashmir" , a region from Northwest India. Gaspar must have been either an Indo-Mauryan or Indo-Aryan, or an adoption by Christian mythology of an older namesake and superpowered wiseman in Vedic religions, Kashpari.
1