Comments by "Yazzam X" (@yazzamx6380) on "The final frontier: astronauts on ISS tell euronews about humanity's future in space" video.

  1. Exactly, well said, but unfortunately conspiracy believers are never interested in what people actually said or meant, they are only interested in twisting what people said or meant to fit their conspiracy beliefs :-|
    4
  2. Don't be so naive and arrogant please :-) You're making EXACTLY the same claim a flat Earth believer put to me recently when he claimed that astronauts know the Earth is flat but they can't say it publicly, where he distorted the meaning of what the astronauts said to make his point. I'm not saying you're a flat Earth believer, but your thinking and your argument is just like one, where because YOU personally think there's a conspiracy then YOU decide others are either in on the conspiracy or are afraid to talk and hence are dropping bread crumbs for others to follow 🙄 🙂
    4
  3. Because you're a flat Earth believer. Right? :-)
    4
  4.  @Enthcreations  - You're welcome :-)
    4
  5. Except he didn't.
    4
  6.  @firehorse5206  - And there are flat Earth believers who would stake their life on the Earth being flat without any worry, but that doesn't make it so. The 'brain washed' accusation is a rather childish approach used by those who have no real arguments, so stick to discussing the facts please. For any conspiracy theory, you only need to present ONE piece of evidence that proves the conspiracy to call into question the official version of events that the conspiracy theory challenges. So please state what you consider to be the BEST evidence that the moon landings were a hoax. The ONE claim that stands above all the other hoax claims as being the strongest evidence in your opinion and lets examine it. If selecting just ONE hoax claim is too difficult, then fine, select your top three (the BEST three), and lets see if they hold up to close scrutiny. I look forward to your choice :-)
    3
  7.  @firehorse5206  - It's easy to despise what you don't understand, in fact that's just human nature, which is what conspiracy theorists so brilliantly play upon knowing that people like yourself would be convinced through ignorance, with all due respect :-)
    3
  8. Been there 9 times from 1968 to 1972, walked on the surface 6 times.
    3
  9.  @appletongallery  - Are the Russians paying you to spew conspiracy nonsense? No? Then don't use that childish logic with me please :-) If you believe the moon landings were a hoax, then you must believe the USSR were in on a hoax against themselves. Right?
    3
  10. ​ @ajrwilde14  - So explain why you think it's impossible for people to go into space. Do you think unmanned spacecraft and satellites are a hoax too?
    3
  11. No, the spacesuits are liquid cooled (water running through tubes within the suit), and hence a leak in the tube will cause the water to fill the spacesuit, in this case to leak into his helmet.
    3
  12. Nope. Moon landings. 100%
    3
  13. Why not?
    3
  14. That's just ignorance from you my friend. How long did that press conference take place after the astronauts returned to Earth? Guess if you don't know. And you claim they traveled to the moon and back in trash, so present a photo of the so-called 'trash' please.
    3
  15.  @ojaiallen8004  - You said "My bad. To answer your question the Press Conference was about a month after the supposed return from the moon...July 1969. Peace out!" No problem. But the reality is, it was 3 weeks, where the astronauts spent those 3 weeks in quarantine. The point is, people like 'light in the dark ' have listen to conspiracy theorists who claim the astronauts don't look happy in that press conference on the basis that they only JUST got back from the moon, perhaps hours earlier or at most a day or so ago. Hence all their body language assumptions are nonsense, especially since the astronauts behaved the same way in previous press conferences. Unfortunately, for today's audience used to a diet of false and exaggerated TV emotions, then because the astronauts didn't enter the press conference with massive grins on their faces, high-fiving the people in the front row, while whooping and wailing throughout the press conference to show their excitement to the world, they assume something must be wrong and therefore it was all a hoax :-D
    3
  16.  @ojaiallen8004  - Not a representative, just someone who thinks that the truth and facts are important, where the moment we sit back and allow charlatans to distort the truth/facts to suit themselves, then we would be heading for trouble as a society. For example, Bill Clinton did NOT doubt the moon landings, that's a claim made by conspiracy theorists who quote mined a paragraph from his book to distort what he meant, as well as ignoring other references to the moon landings in Bill's SAME book that shows he knew they landed on the moon! If you look up the SLS rocket due to launch next year, you will see it is as large and as powerful as the Apollo Saturn V rocket. Hence in 2023/2024, the SLS rocket will take astronauts back to the moon. As for the time period, so what my friend? :-) Men first reach the South Pole in 1911/1912 but didn't return until 1956, 44 YEARS later. Men first reach the lowest point in Earth's ocean called the Marina Trench in 1960, but didn't return until 2012, 52 YEARS later. So again, for me the truth matters, the facts matter, they really do. All the best :-)
    3
  17. You can guarantee all you want, you're wrong :-)
    3
  18. Nope. Next? :-)
    3
  19. Why did you leave out the words "RIGHT NOW" Kevin? :-) He clearly said "RIGHT NOW!" In the same way that RIGHT NOW none of us can book a flight on a supersonic passenger plane because RIGHT NOW no such plane is in service. RIGHT NOW we don't have a rocket in service as large and as powerful as the 60s Saturn V rocket that can take people out of low Earth orbit and to the moon. RIGHT NOW we don't have a passenger plane in service like the 60s Concorde that can take people across the world at twice the speed of sound. Now look up NASA's SLS rocket which is due to launch this year. That rocket is as large as the Saturn V rocket that took men to the moon and is slightly more powerful, and hence will take people back to the moon in 2024.
    3
  20. Sure, we were never on the moon, but during the 60s/70s TWELVE American astronauts walked on the moon :-)
    2
  21. No, that's not what they're saying, otherwise according to the late Eugene Cernan, Buzz Aldrin has been to Mars. Who cares if that wasn't what he meant to say, we should take the exact words he used, right? :-)
    2
  22. Actually we have, i.e. we can.
    2
  23. Actually, you need to think when listening instead of jumping to conclusions based upon what conspiracy theorists tell you. They said we can't send people beyond low Earth orbit TODAY, since we need a massive rocket to do that! They built the Saturn V rocket during the 60s to achieve that (still the largest rocket EVER launched into space) and NASA have almost completed a new rocket of equal size called the SLS, due to launch next year. The Orion engineer said Van Allen belt radiation is a problem for modern electronics, hence they must test Orion in space FIRST to make sure the electronics work without problems BEFORE risking sending people through the belts inside Orion (which is the common sense thing to do), since their lives will depend upon the electronics. Orion was tested in space in December 2014, where they sent it through the region of the belts with the highest radiation TWICE and it aced that test, proving the craft is safe to go through the belts with people inside. The structures inside old electronics were HUGE compared to today's electronics and hence were not sensitive to the electrons in Van Allen belt radiation and therefore the crude electronics back then didn't need the shielding that today's modern electronics requires. So yes, someone is lying, where the 'someone' in question are conspiracy theorists.
    2
  24. Yes, a great sci-fi film that proved that faking one mission and getting away with it is impossible, much less faking the same missions several times :-)
    2
  25. There is lag in the Apollo communications, you simply don't understand when it should happen and when it shouldn't.
    2
  26. ​   - Come on, really? :-) Right now (since 2003), passenger planes can't reach the speed of sound, much less reach TWICE the speed of sound like Concorde. Does that mean Concorde was a hoax? Right now (since 2011) the USA can't send ANYONE into low Earth orbit themselves. Does that mean the Space Shuttle and all previous manned American rockets were hoaxes? Of course not, so why use that flawed logic for manned space missions? Look up the massive SLS rocket due to launch at the end of this year (although current events means it's likely to be early next year) where it will take the Orion space capsule to the moon and back to Earth. That new rocket is as large and as powerful as the Saturn V rockets that took men to the moon. Assuming the debut launch is a success, then in 2024 the SLS rocket will again take the Orion space capsule to the moon and back to Earth, but this time with a crew of astronauts on board.
    2
  27.  @appletongallery  - Sending people to the moon requires building the largest and the most powerful rockets in history. Back then, the USA built the spacecraft and the massively expensive Saturn V rocket (thanks to Congress increasing NASA's budget by up to 9 TIMES normal) for that purpose and it worked like a dream, hence they were able to use it to send their astronauts to the moon, but the cost meant it wasn't sustainable. In contrast, the USSR/Russia built the massively expensive N1-L3 rocket, but unfortunately it was a nightmare, it blew up during every test launch and so the USSR didn't have a rocket to send their cosmonauts to the moon. Therefore they eventually had to cancel their manned moon landing program. China became only the third nation to build rockets capable of sending people into space in 2003, thanks to help from Russia, hence they're getting there with their space program and are working towards building their own Saturn V class rocket for their future manned moon landings. Now look up NASA's massive SLS rocket which is as large as the Saturn V and slightly more powerful, where it is now complete and due to launch this February, where it will take the Orion space capsule to the moon and back to Earth. The same SLS rocket is scheduled to take a crew of astronauts inside the Orion space capsule to the moon in 2024 (lunar orbit, like Apollo 8). When the lunar lander is eventually ready, then they will land on the moon sometime after 2024 (the original plan was around 2028 before Trump tried to bring it forward to 2024).
    2
  28.  @appletongallery  - Except there are no excuses. The record breaking Saturn V rocket was real, where no rocket launched worldwide since then matches the size and power of the Saturn V, until the SLS launches in February. After the Saturn V was retired in the 70s, please name the rocket by any nation that was as large and as powerful and hence capable of taking people to the moon, because I must have missed it :-) You said "If we don’t do it on their proposed date..." Lets wait and see if the SLS rocket works first, much less the Starship rockets of Space X. If the SLS launch in February succeeds in taking the Orion CREW capsule to the moon and then back to Earth for a safe landing, then what do you think would hold up the manned mission planned for around 2024 or so? You said "For instance in 2040 if we still haven’t gone back, will Yazzam X finally accept that we never went?" And if we don't see another supersonic passenger plane by 2040, would you conclude that Concorde was a hoax? Because that's the logic you're using :-)
    2
  29. Nope, that's like listening to a pilot saying we can't send 100 passengers across the Atlantic at twice the speed of sound today and deciding that means Concorde was a hoax 🙄
    2
  30.  @flyfe  - Yes, RIGHT NOW! In the same way that RIGHT NOW none of us can book a flight on a supersonic passenger plane because RIGHT NOW no such plane is in service. RIGHT NOW we don't have a rocket in service as large and as powerful as the 60s Saturn V rocket that can take people out of low Earth orbit and to the moon. RIGHT NOW we don't have a passenger plane in service like the 60s Concorde that can take people across the world at twice the speed of sound. Now look up NASA's SLS rocket which is due to launch this year. That rocket is as large as the Saturn V rocket that took men to the moon and is slightly more powerful, and hence will take people back to the moon in 2024. So come on, are you still going to say you don't understand what they mean by RIGHT NOW? :-)
    2
  31.  @ojaiallen8004  - But since you posted other points, I must address them... NASA do NOT say they've never sent men to the moon, they say we don't have the ROCKET TODAY capable of taking people to the moon (achieved back then with the massive Saturn V rocket), but they will have that rocket again soon with the SLS (look it up), After all, since 2011 when the Space Shuttle retired, the USA lost the technology to send people into space. Therefore if you ask NASA if they (the USA) can send people into space today, they will say "no we can't". Would you take that as NASA explicitly admitting they've never sent people into space? Of course you wouldn't, so why apply that same distorted 'logic' to Apollo? And do you consider all the following spacecraft and satellites and rovers covered with gold foil to be fake? Google Image Search: Satellite Gold Foil Or would you understand the logic of that foil being a cheap and convenient method to reflect away heat from the sun? :-) As for the claim of faking being half way to the moon, watch the following short video that shows how Bart Sibrel LIED when he made that false claim in his documentary; Go to my channel and click on the video: Addendum A Funny Thing Happened... (Mirror) See how easy it is for people like Bart to lie and get away with it? :-)
    2
  32.  @pabloharris7371  - Get over it kid :-)
    2
  33. Nope. Next? :-)
    2
  34.  @SuperBroop  - I'm sorry about your personal problems, but lets focus on the topic instead :-) Quote the admission you speak of.
    2
  35.  @SuperBroop  - No, that's you failing to understand what is being said due to your personal bias :-) Imagine an airline today saying "Right now we only can fly passenger planes at less than the speed of sound, that's the fastest we can go, and this new passenger plane that we're building is going to allow us to go beyond the sound barrier to twice the speed of sound" According to you, that would be the airline admitting passenger planes have never broken the sound barrier and so Concorde was fake :-)
    2
  36.  @SuperBroop  - Nice avoidance of my comparison to an airline effectively saying the same about supersonic passenger planes, where as if by magic you would understand what that airline is saying :-)
    2
  37.  @SuperBroop  - You continue to prove my point perfectly, thanks.
    2
  38.  @SuperBroop  - So you can only parrot "cognitive dissonance" and "Critical thinking" without presenting any evidence yourself that you're able to defend in a debate, all because you read those words from other conspiracy believers without understanding them. That says it all :-) So go ahead kid, state what you consider to be the best hoax claim, the ONE claim you feel offers the strongest evidence that men didn't land on the moon, and lets discuss it here. In other words, demonstrate your critical thinking. No excuses please :-)
    2
  39.  @SuperBroop  - Btw, if you're a flat Earth believer, then just say so :-)
    2
  40.  @flyfe  - He said "RIGHT NOW!" In the same way that RIGHT NOW none of us can book a flight on a supersonic passenger plane because RIGHT NOW no such plane is in service. RIGHT NOW we don't have a rocket in service as large and as powerful as the 60s Saturn V rocket that can take people out of low Earth orbit and to the moon. RIGHT NOW we don't have a passenger plane in service like the 60s Concorde that can take people across the world at twice the speed of sound. Now look up NASA's SLS rocket which is due to launch this year. That rocket is as large as the Saturn V rocket that took men to the moon and is slightly more powerful, and hence will take people back to the moon in 2024. So come on, are you still going to say you don't understand what they mean by RIGHT NOW? :-)
    2
  41.  @hdmf  - Put your nails away :-)
    2
  42.  @thinkinsidetheboxsquarecir3303  - On what basis did you work out how much money is needed? :-) This year we'll see NASA launch the most powerful rocket in history, called the SLS, a rocket more powerful than the Apollo Saturn V, where it will return people to the moon in 2024. That rocket has been in development for around 10 years. If NASA had more funding (as they did during Apollo) then they could have completed and launched the SLS YEARS ago. That's the difference that more money can make.
    2
  43.  @BlackAdder1970  - Nothing was 'admitted' in this clip :-|
    1
  44. So you're really saying no-one has been into space much less low Earth orbit? All such missions since the 60s were made up? That's what you're claiming here? :-|
    1
  45. Nope. Next? :-)
    1
  46. No it doesn't, which is why no-one on any channel has ever named the videos they uploaded that YT took down for that reason. Fact.
    1
  47. You even claim ISS is a lie? Are you a flat Earth believer? :-|
    1
  48. Then list the violations please :-) They are in orbit, inside the ISS observed by people all over the world for decades, so why the denial? :-|
    1
  49.  @thinkinsidetheboxsquarecir3303  - Incorrect, since that law applies when no external force is acting upon the gas in a significant way. As it stands, the gravitation attraction between the gas molecules and the Earth is greater than the energy required for the gas molecules to escape the Earth, hence forming our atmosphere. The greater the distance from the surface of the Earth the weaker the gravitational attraction and so the easier it is for gas molecules to spread out, resulting in increasing vacuum conditions. So no laws are being broken.
    1
  50.  @thinkinsidetheboxsquarecir3303  - Ask those involved in stem cell research about the benefits. There are no wires or harnesses, where if YOU looked into such claims and thought about it yourself instead of blindly believing what conspiracy theorists tell you without question, then YOU would spot the flaws in their claims.
    1
  51.  @thinkinsidetheboxsquarecir3303  - You effectively prove my points, thanks, where you demonstrate the classic ignorance of making this about NASA as if the 70 other government space agencies and private space companies and satellite companies around the world don't exist, much like sciences like Astronomy :-) So put your comments into context by explaining why you parroted the flat Earth believer claim about an atmosphere next to a vacuum, you know, the laws of physics that you falsely claimed were broken! Are you are flat Earth believer? If not, then why regurgitate their claims?
    1
  52.  @thinkinsidetheboxsquarecir3303 - You said " it’s a one world government!" Ah yes, the classic conspiracy believer 'hiding behind your couch' paranoia that they're all evil and they're all in on it together :-D Where you have the privilege to sit comfortably posting your replies without being able to state anything terrible that those 'evil' governments have actually done to you or your family personally! I guess some people need danger in their life, they need something to fight against, and so when it's not there then any fantasy will do ;-) Besides, you avoided answering my last questions, which were and I quote "Are you are flat Earth believer? If not, then why regurgitate their claims?"
    1
  53.  @thinkinsidetheboxsquarecir3303  - What do you think needs to be explained by logos using a silhouette of the Azimuthal Equidistant 2D projection map of a globe Earth, a projection map was was only jumped upon by flat Earth theorists because it stretches Antarctica around the outside and hence they claimed it to be their magical wall of ice. That's the same map that many flat Earth believers know as the AE map or the Gleason map, a map that Gleason himself says is a projection from a GLOBE Earth with TWO poles. So your point is what exactly? :-)
    1
  54.  @thinkinsidetheboxsquarecir3303  - You still avoid answering two simple questions, which again were "Are you are flat Earth believer? If not, then why regurgitate their claims?" Why can't you just say "Yes", "No" or "I don't know the shape of the Earth"?
    1
  55.  @thinkinsidetheboxsquarecir3303  - You said "what is your sudden obsession with “flat earth”? Don’t change the subject!" There is no obsession and it is on topic, since YOU brought up the question of an atmosphere next to the vacuum of space, something that only flat Earth believers question. You even said and I quote "if there’s a void (up there ^)", the key word being "IF". What makes you think there's any question about the existence of space? Again, it is only flat Earth believers who claim that space is fake. So when I see someone parroting certain flat Earth claims, then it is fair to ask that person if he/she is a flat Earth believer, and it shouldn't be a problem for that person to answer... unless he/she has something to hide :-)
    1
  56.  @thinkinsidetheboxsquarecir3303  - You said "my question is about the Vector symbol that used on every country with a space program for a logo! Answer that , please" You were not specific before, and even then I'm still not clear what you're taking about, especially when you haven't even stated why you think it's significant (whatever it is).
    1
  57.  @thinkinsidetheboxsquarecir3303  - Old enough you have watched all the Apollo missions live. And how old are you? Besides, you still haven't answered the flat Earth questions, nor explained why you question the existence of space or why you questions an atmosphere in the vacuum of space (i.e. the points that YOU made which brought flat Earth into this discussion).
    1
  58.  @thinkinsidetheboxsquarecir3303  - You said "Why do you think all of the “separate and independent nations” all have the same vector symbols and logos for their space programs?!" and "my question is about the Vector symbol that used on every country with a space program for a logo!" Here's some space agency logos; is PERIOD gd FORWARDSLASH BhTA4I So what exactly is the 'Vector' that links all those logos please?
    1
  59.  @thinkinsidetheboxsquarecir3303  - You said " joe Rogan isn’t a “Flat earther” last I checked and he is skeptical about NASA’s claims" WRONG. He used to be skeptical of the moon landings but then changed his mind upon examining the evidence. He now states, without any doubt, that men landed on the moon. But nice try ;-)
    1
  60. That's a video featuring NASA's Kelly Smith talking about the effect of Van Allen belt radiation upon the modern electronics of the Orion space capsule only, where they cannot risk sending people to the moon inside Orion if the electronics could fail, therefore that video spoke about thoroughly TESTING the Orion space capsule in space inside the belts FIRST before risking sending people through. Wouldn't you agree that's a common sense approach? :-) And they did that, sending Orion into the region of the belts with the highest radiation in 2014 and it aced that test, then Orion went through the belts to the moon and back to Earth on a 25 day mission to test all the systems in 2022 during the Artemis 1 mission. Therefore Orion is not proven to be safe for astronauts. Unfortunately, and typically, conspiracy theorists twisted what Kelly Smith said in that video knowing that many people would fall for it :-|
    1
  61.  @SuperBroop  - In other words you admit you cannot present a hoax claim that you are able to defend yourself. So case closed :-)
    1
  62.  @SuperBroop  - So you still cannot present a claim that you can debate here, hence you continue to prove my point perfectly. In future, I suggest you stick to topics that you actually understand. Do you think you can manage that? :-)
    1
  63.  @SuperBroop  - Thank you for conceding :-)
    1
  64.  @SuperBroop  - Nice projection kid :-)
    1
  65.  @JulioCortazas-ui2dk  - Forgive me my friend but I'm not really sure what you're trying to say here, perhaps because my last reply here was 2 years ago ;-) For example, you appear to be questioning the technology and yet during the 60s both the USA and USSR landed several unmanned spacecraft on the moon with even LESS computing power than what was available for the Apollo missions, proving that the computing power available was more than sufficient for the task. The technology was state of the art back then, it cost a fortune and wasn't available to ordinary consumers, and therefore there was no problem using that state of the art technology to get men to the moon.
    1
  66.  @MAGATRON-DESTROY  - It's 2024 and we can't send 100 passengers across the world at supersonic speeds and yet Concorde could do that, a passenger plane that first flew in 1969. So by your logic Concorde was fake :-) And don't reply with a list of reasons why Concorde had to end, because it you can manage that then you would have no problems working out why Apollo had to end if you actually tried!
    1
  67.  @MAGATRON-DESTROY  - So check out the unmanned Artemis 1 mission and read what it achieved in 2022, and then check the manned Artemis 2 mission :-)
    1