Comments by "Yazzam X" (@yazzamx6380) on "VICE News"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@stephenboyd4934 - Yes I can prove it (and I will in this reply), but first I would say the moon landings are a scientific and a historic FACT, whether you like it or not and whether you believe it or not.
Therefore claiming it was a hoax makes YOU the claimant, and hence the burden of proof is on the claimant.
Remember, for ANY conspiracy theory, you only need to present ONE PIECE OF EVIDENCE of a conspiracy that holds up to close scrutiny to prove it (or at the very least, to prove the conspiracy is highly likely).
So please present what you consider to be the BEST evidence of a hoax and lets discuss it. Just ONE please, the BEST one (if choosing just one hoax claim is too difficult, then select your top three).
Besides, any evidence from NASA would be automatically dismissed by you, therefore here's some third party evidence (where ALL the sources for this information can be found in the reference section at the bottom of the page);
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_evidence_for_Apollo_Moon_landings
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@svestore1 - As for your video twisting what Don said... Please explain how the Apollo craft are any more "destroyed" than the Space Shuttle which will also never launch into space again (where ALL can be found in museums).
Explain how the SLS rocket due to launch this year, which is as large and as powerful as the Saturn V rocket that got men to the moon, is not an example of rebuilding the lost technology that Don spoke of.
Explain how the Orion space capsule successfully tested in the Van Allen belts in 2014 and to be taken to the moon and back on the debut launch of the SLS, a capsule larger and more sophisticated than the Apollo Command Module, is not an example of rebuilding the lost technology that Don spoke of.
Can you really not understand that Don was referring to technology that we no longer have, where the infrastructure and services that built, maintained, launched/flew that technology is all gone, and therefore that technology is lost, destroyed (Saturn V, Concorde, Space Shuttle, etc)?
So come on, just because you believe the moon landings were a hoax, it doesn't mean you're contractually obliged to believe EVERY hoax claim from EVERY conspiracy theorist out there. It IS possible to think for yourself and say a specific hoax claim is wrong while still believing the moon landings were a hoax :-)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1