Comments by "Yazzam X" (@yazzamx6380) on "Primal Space"
channel.
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Mike588 - Exactly :-)
It's a problem common among the vast majority of conspiracy believers, where once someone decides a certain conspiracy theory is true, then for some reason he/she feels obligated to support EVERY claim made in support of that conspiracy, no matter how ridiculous the claim is.
It is very rare for me to find someone who says something like "Yes, you're right, that specific claim is wrong, but that doesn't change the fact that the conspiracy is true". Instead, it's all or nothing for most conspiracy believers.
Therefore when told they "lost the technology" for example, very few Apollo hoax believers are willing to see it without bias, and so it's incredibly rare for one of them to have the courage to say "Look guys, you know me, you know I always say men never landed on the moon, but I also know what they meant when they said they lost the technology, and it isn't what you guys claim".
It doesn't happen because the vast majority of conspiracy believers are afraid to challenge their fellow conspiracy believers, and so either they keep quiet over claims they disagree with, or they just go along with the crowd.
Shame :-|
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
Consider this please. Today, we have a HUGE number of geostationary satellites broadcasting live TV channels FROM SPACE to millions upon millions of people. Those satellites are over 22,000 MILES away, broadcasting TV channels via a weak 40W radio signal, and yet all we need to pick up those channels are very SMALL satellite dishes like this;
www.protv.co.uk/uploads/Sky%20dish%20installation%20in%20Bletchley.JPG
The moon is about 11 times further away, therefore to receive the signal to the same strength would require a bigger dish, just like the massive radio dishes/telescopes used during the Apollo missions, like this;
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/46/Parkes_Radio_Telescope_09.jpg/800px-Parkes_Radio_Telescope_09.jpg
So it's exactly the same principle. Your satellite dish (if you have one) works because it is pointed directly at the satellite, where despite being over 22,000 miles away you can receive the TV channels perfectly if your dish is aligned correctly.
Now move that SAME satellite to the distance of the moon and the signal would be too weak for your small satellite dish, but if you have the massive Parkes Radio Telescope in the link above, then you'll receive the TV channels without any problems, and you'll also be able to receive and send radio signals significant further than the moon.
Although I'm sure you would agree that such a large radio dish is not practical to attach to your home ;-)
And because the Earth rotates, then for distant spacecraft we will need to use at least THREE massive radio dishes spread around the world to ensure that one of them is in direct line of sight of the spacecraft at any given time.
So it's not a mystery my friend, it's just science and engineering.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Q-physics - You continue to prove my points :-)
Go ahead and present your proof that websites and videos about a moon landing hoax are being suppressed and even removed by Google and YouTube and the mainstream media etc, despite the fact that my email notification history shows that the vast majority of ALL the conspiracy videos I've commented on over the years ARE STILL THERE!
I look forward to your evidence (be specific please :-)).
And lets address some of your other nonsense, for example, you said "there's a private sector initiative to send a micro drone to the supposed landing site that will go one step further than the chinese did, it will actually photograph any equipment left behind ..the Chinese were unable to do this"
www.universetoday.com/93375/china-unveils-high-resolution-global-moon-map/
Quote: "In fact the maps are detailed enough that Chinese scientists were able to detect traces of the Apollo landers, said Yan Jun, chief application scientist for China’s lunar exploration project."
Sure it's from orbit, but the Chinese confirmed the presence of large craft at the Apollo landing sites just the same. Why didn't you know that given your claimed 35 years of research? :-)
Also, the Apollo moon landings were a MASSIVE propaganda coup for the USA, where the race to the moon was seen by the world back then as a battle between capitalism and communism.
It would have been impossible to fake a moon landing without the USSR uncovering the hoax, and the USSR had the technology to DIRECTLY exposed a moon landing hoax ANY TIME they wanted, and yet they never did.
And there's no way the USSR would just sit back and allow the USA to achieve such a propaganda coup against communism with a lie.
So much for your claimed research, much less your so-called expertise in physics :-)
1
-
@Q-physics - And let me repost what I said before, since it appears to have gone over your head :-)
Quote: "What has changed is that YouTube recently changed the search algorithm to prevent conspiracy videos from completely dominating search lists as they were for the last several years.
In other words, if last year I searched YouTube for "Apollo moon landings", then instead of a list mostly about the Apollo moon landings, that list would be dominated by Apollo HOAX videos.
Now if you want to find conspiracy videos (moon landings, flat Earth, etc) then you have to be more specific in your search, which is not difficult.
That's how it should be and hence YouTube have simply redressed the balance"
Anything there you still don't understand?
So again, the videos have not been deleted, they are still there, but they don't bubble up to the top of searches now unless you're more specific.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@davel7791 - You said "...(and telemetry data)".
100% incorrect!
For permanent storage, telemetry data was always printed out into documents so that the tapes could be reused (the whole point of magnetic tapes!).
After each Apollo mission a comprehensive mission report was published where all the telemetry data was analyzed and presented as charts and graphs and tables .
So here's the mission report for Apollo 11 (for example) published in November 1969. It even includes the astronaut's heart rate telemetry data as they descended to the moon's surface, their heart rate during their time on the moon and their heart rate when they left the moon's surface (hence proving none of the telemetry data was lost) ;
www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/A11_MissionReport.pdf
So if you want to believe the moon landings were a hoax, then fine that's your opinion, but why should that mean you MUST blindly believe ALL the hoax claims without question?
And read this too;
www.firstmenonthemoon.com/about.html
Quote: "We have compiled hours of content available from public domain sources and various NASA websites. Thamtech staff and volunteers generously devoted their time to transcribe hours of speech to text. By using simultaneous space and land based audio and video, transcripts, images, spacecraft telemetry, and biomedical data --this synchronized presentation reveals the Moon Shot as experienced by the astronauts and flight controllers."
Hence that's the same telemetry data that conspiracy theorists claim was lost !
The point is, as I said before, once the telemetry data was printed out for a hard copy, the magnetic tapes were reused.
So we don't have all the tapes (just as we don't have all the tapes for most space missions of the 60s/70s), but we have all the telemetry data that were ON those tapes .
Any questions? :-)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1