Comments by "Yazzam X" (@yazzamx6380) on "JRE Clips" channel.

  1. 3
  2. 3
  3. 3
  4. 3
  5. 3
  6. 3
  7. 3
  8. 3
  9.  @SubMasters  - You also said "By the way where's all the telemetry data from NASA?" Where's it's always been, since nothing has been lost. Telemetry data was always printed out into documents so that the tapes could be reused (the whole point of magnetic tapes!). After each Apollo mission a comprehensive mission report was published where all the telemetry data was analyzed and presented as charts and graphs and tables . So here's the mission report for Apollo 11 (for example) published in November 1969. It even includes the astronaut's heart rate telemetry data as they descended to the moon's surface, their heart rate during their time on the moon and their heart rate when they left the moon's surface (hence proving none of the telemetry data was lost); www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/A11_MissionReport.pdf So if you want to believe the moon landings were a hoax, then fine that's your opinion, but why should that mean you MUST blindly believe ALL the hoax claims without question? And read this too; www.firstmenonthemoon.com/about.html Quote: "We have compiled hours of content available from public domain sources and various NASA websites. Thamtech staff and volunteers generously devoted their time to transcribe hours of speech to text. By using simultaneous space and land based audio and video, transcripts, images, spacecraft telemetry, and biomedical data — this synchronized presentation reveals the Moon Shot as experienced by the astronauts and flight controllers." Hence that's the same telemetry data that conspiracy theorists claim was lost. The point is, as I said before, once the telemetry data was printed out for a hard copy the magnetic tapes were reused. So we don't have all the tapes (just as we don't have all the tapes for most space missions of the 60s/70s), but we have all the telemetry data that were ON those tapes .
    3
  10. 3
  11. 3
  12. 3
  13. 3
  14. 3
  15. 3
  16. 3
  17. 3
  18. 3
  19. 3
  20. 3
  21. 3
  22. 3
  23. 3
  24. 3
  25. 3
  26. 3
  27. 3
  28. 3
  29. 3
  30. 3
  31. 3
  32. 3
  33.  @mikeysweetfolksfiv3ohthr332  - You said "Okay then why isn't his description of an Oblate Spheroid shown in NASA official(but CGI) photos of the Earth ....." Except it is my friend, but many flat Earth believers didn't listen to what Neil said but only to what they wanted to believe he said (btw, can you explain how you PERSONALLY determined if a photo of the Earth is real or CGI. Can you take me through YOUR methods please. You don't have to answer that, but please think about where that CGI claim comes from... ;-)). For example; Here's an example of where the pear shape reference came from; www.youtube.com/watch?v=SoCKapivHGM Neil: "So, Earth throughout it's life even when it formed it was spinning, and it got a little wider at the equator than it does at the poles, so it's not actually a sphere, it's oblate, and officially it's an oblate spheroid, that's what we call it". Neil: "But not only that, it's slightly wider below the equator than above the equator" Interviewer: "A little chubbier" Neil: "A little chubbier, chubbier's a good word, it's like pear shaped. So ..." [Some audience laughter] Neil: "... it turns out, the pear-shapedness is bigger than the height of Mount Everest above sea level ..." [Edited out discussion about the smoothness of Earth's surface compared to its size] Neil: "...but cosmically speaking, we're practically a perfect sphere." Therefore Neil did NOT say the Earth literally looks like a pear, he says it's an oblate spheroid that is slightly bigger below the equator compared to above (hence the pear analogy) and says the difference overall is so small that the Earth is practically a perfect sphere. Therefore the Earth will also look like a perfect sphere in photographs taken in space. The point is, if you want to believe the Earth is flat, then fine that's your right, but you effectively lose the argument when you distort what is actually being said by scientists and others about the Earth being a globe :-|
    3
  34. 3
  35. 3
  36. 3
  37. 3
  38. 3
  39. 3
  40. 3
  41. 3
  42. 3
  43. 3
  44. 3
  45. 3
  46. 3
  47. 3
  48. 3
  49. 3
  50. 3