Comments by "Yazzam X" (@yazzamx6380) on "JRE Clips"
channel.
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@lcx1876 - You said "you attacked me from the very beginning"
You seem to forget we have email notifications, but just the same, it's amusing that you once again focus on the people and make accusations and demands instead of contributing to the arguments being put forward, and hence you add practically nothing to the debate itself, as you've shown here.
Also, unlike you with terms like 'globers', I never use derogatory names to describe flat Earth believers, hence I never call them flerfs, or flatties, or even flat earthers, only flat Earth believers. FACT.
Likewise I refer to others as moon landing hoax believers or Apollo hoax believers, alien UFO believers, alien crop circle believers, ghost believers, etc.
You can't say the same.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@edwardcopeland5069 - You said "I don't know why dubay have turned down debates in the pass, but I know he wouldn't turned down one with Neil..."
You cannot know that when Eric has never had such a debate, not even with the flat Earth theorists that he publicly accused of being fake and working for the government (eg. Mark Sargent).
You said "...he and NASA wouldn't dare give Eric the Chance to hit back"
Again you're seeing what you want to see instead of looking for the facts :-|
Neil doesn't debate flat Earth theorists for the same reason he doesn't waste his time debating Concave Earth theorists, or Hollow Earth theorists, or crop circle theorists, or ISS hoax theorists, or alien abduction theorists, or Electric Universe theorists, etc.
So why should Neil make flat Earth theorists a special case for debate?
If Neil had a history of debating leading theorists of many other conspiracy claims, then sure you could argue he should do the same for flat Earth theorists. But that's not the case.
Therefore there's no reason for Neil to waste his time debating people who have their own view of reality and their own agendas, where their 'theories' has nothing to do with science and nothing to do with the scientific method :-|
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@spaceisfake2816 - EVERY photo taken by your phone was data captured by light falling onto the cmos sensor, which was turned into the final image.
Not only that, but your cmos sensor doesn't actually 'see' color, only light intensity (think grey scale), and therefore color has to be reconstructed via filters and mathematical algorithms.
By the logic of conspiracy theorists, that means ALL the digital photos that you've ever taken by phone or camera are fakes! :-)
And gravity is what makes it possible for gas atmospheres around a planet in the vacuum of space (a vacuum is NOT suction btw).
I kept the explanations above short because it's interesting that, like so many, you only question the established facts.
So for balance, given that you say no-one knows, can you name a few of the flat Earth claims that you personally question (and explain why), claims that makes you doubt the 'theory' that the Earth is flat?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3