Comments by "Yazzam X" (@yazzamx6380) on "Bart Sibrel Argues That The Moon Landing Was Staged" video.

  1. So you're saying the USSR were stupid back then? Also, what makes you think today's computer power has anything to do with the USA's ability to send men to the moon back then?
    1
  2. How is that any different to flat Earth believer telling me the same about space and ALL spacecraft and satellites?
    1
  3. Are you a flat Earth believer? :-)
    1
  4. Nope. Next? :-)
    1
  5.  @Stanley-x4w  - Your opinion can be that Harry Potter is a real wizard and not fiction, but that doesn't make it true ;-)
    1
  6. Exceptionally poor logic from you. If the Apollo missions were a |ie and hence billions went into a program that never happened, then that WOULD be a conspiracy. Fortunately the USA sent men to the moon 9 times from 1968 to 1972, landing during 6 of those missions, so there's no conspiracy :-)
    1
  7. So you're saying the USSR were stupid back then? :-|
    1
  8.  @Mason-ps4ng  - So you're a flat Earth believer?
    1
  9. Both the USA and USSR landed several unmanned spacecraft on the moon during the 60s BEFORE the Apollo missions so that they knew what to expect. The USSR even landed two car-size remote controlled rovers on the moon in 1970 and 1973 respectively. The fact that you didn't know that says a lot :-)
    1
  10. Wrong, it is impossible to fake the Apollo footage in any studio with actors today, much less back in 1969 to 1972 :-|
    1
  11.  @PatrickPutin-yy8ju  - I know you said we went to the moon my friend, but I'm saying none of the footage was faked. As I will explain...
    1
  12. To this day no-one has EVER recreated in a studio with actors the perfect 1/6 gravity seen in hour after hour of Apollo footage, where even the kicked up dust and dropped objects fall at the rate of the moon's gravity. Not even in the moon scenes in the highest budget sci-fi films (remember, no advanced CGI existed back in 1969-1972). Even modern high budget movies like "The Martian" with its CGI effects doesn't attempt to recreate the 1/3 gravity of Mars for the surface scenes! That's because it's impossible to recreate such effects perfectly in real time on a studio/set with actors, so they typically don't bother at all for Mars and usually resort to rather poor attempts for moon scenes, where only recently have they improved such visuals thanks to advanced CGI, which again wasn't available back in the 60s/70s. Therefore if someone successfully recreates perfect 1/6 gravity in a studio and hence demonstrates uncut footage that matches the Apollo footage in every way in terms of gravity, THEN I would drop that argument straight away, because that would be proof that it is possible to fake the Apollo footage here on Earth. Until then it remains a fact that the footage was filmed in an environment with no air and 1/6 gravity, and hence that environment was the moon :-)
    1
  13.  @PatrickPutin-yy8ju  - I couldn't care less about it as a topic my friend. I have absolutely no interest. One of my areas of 'expertise' is space and space travel (being a practicing amateur astronomer since the 70s) and therefore I prefer to debate topics that a) I understand to a very high standard, and b) I'm interested in it. I don't pretend to be an expert in topics that I have very little knowledge or very little interest, unlike many conspiracy believers ;-) I'm sure you can appreciate that? Anyway, getting back to this topic... :-)
    1
  14. Both the USA and USSR landed several unmanned spacecraft on the moon during the 60s BEFORE the Apollo missions so that they knew what to expect. The USSR even landed two car-size remote controlled rovers on the moon in 1970 and 1973 respectively. The fact that you didn't know that says a lot :-)
    1