Comments by "This Channel" (@thischannel1071) on "Johnny Harris"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ElenaKomleva I thought that I might have received an apology for your assumptions about me and your accusations after I proved that I am as I said. But, instead, you're switching gears / deflecting from your errors of judgment and trying to protect your sense of entitlement to be indignant. Cut the BS. I said specific things, which are all true. You responded with conspiracy theories, accusations, and insults. Now your theories, accusations, and insults are proven to be false. Where is your remorse? Or, are you an unapologetic liar? And now you have the arrogance to say that my correctly calling you out on your erroneous judgment isn't decent behaviour, after you just falsely judged and accused me and others in this thread? You not only are uninformed and with poor judgment, but you're also a hypocrite.
1
-
@ElenaKomleva Ironically, I haven't said anything about Putin. I have, however, pointed-out specific falsehoods concerning specific topics. And what I have said is true. Judging your intelligence and skills of perception isn't simply a matter of who Navalny is and what he's doing, or what Russia is. It's a matter of how you behave and present yourself when there are things you clearly don't know (including who I am, why I'm posting, and what I know), how receptive you are to truthful information you're unaware of, how gracefully you correct yourself (if you even do correct yourself, which you haven't done). What I see in your responses is that you are intellectually and emotionally immature, and too arrogant to accept when you were wrong.
And as a side-note: In Canada and the US, sometimes retired people have to rummage in garbage bins because they don't have or receive enough money. In Canada and the US, a protest permit is also required for protesting in cities, on private property, in large groups, or when making loud noises.
1
-
@ElenaKomleva What I have said is true, and what experts have assessed generally doesn't conflict with what I've said - but it does conflict with what Johnny's video says. For example, Johnny claimed in his video that the charges against Navalny in the Yves Rocher case were tossed-out and fake. But that's not true at all. The charges were real and the French cosmetics company which issued them, Yves Rocher, stands by them. Navalny petitioned the ECHR about the charges and his Russian trial, and the ECHR ruled that the verdict in the Russian trial was arbitrary and unreasonable, but they didn't toss the charges out and they declined Navalny's argument that the charges were politically motivated. The ECHR also ordered Russia to pay monetary compensation to Russia. But the charges weren't fake, and they weren't thrown-out. Navalny's probation violation wasn't over non-existent charges but over real charges.
That's not me disagreeing with the 'experts', that's me testifying what the expert in this case, the ECHR, actually said and did, which is very different than what Johnny claimed they did.
1
-
@Vokabre Most of the most-popular news in the West is state-sponsored. That in itself doesn't mean anything. The most popular news station in the world, BBC, is state-owned, state-funded, and state-run. State-sponsored Western news includes: BBC, CBC, CNN, Washington Post, Euro News, Deutsche Welle, France 24, Radio France, NPR, PBS, Voice of America, Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Radio Free Asia, RAI, RTVE, ARD... and many others including around 1,400 additional US outlets which are funded by the US government through Corporation For Public Broadcasting.
In general RT is a great news source, with many big names from BBC, NYT, NBC, CNN, The Guardian, and other places having left to work at RT and said that RT allows for much more freedom to report the news truthfully, while outlets like NBC, BBC, NYT would tell their hosts and reporters what to say and what they can't say. RT's reporting of Navalny is certainly more fact-based than this video.
1
-
1
-
@olgai6337 Putin hasn't invaded any country while president. Instead, he's helped Syria, Venezuela, Crimea, South Ossetia and save or protected them from invasions and attempted coups by foreign states. Since 2001, the US and UK have murdered between 5 and 7+ million people in the Middle East, destroyed entire countries, overthrown many governments including Ukraine's, threatened many more countries, destabilized economies killing dozens of thousands to try force revolts against governments, persecuted truth-tellers... But Russia under Putin hasn't invaded any country, hasn't killed any millions of people, and rather than use Russia's military to create wars has used it to respond to acts of aggression and protect the victims. So, how is Putin a villain in that picture of world affairs?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1