Comments by "This Channel" (@thischannel1071) on "Johnny Harris"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@whitewall1948 Except that you didn't expose me for any lying. Ukraine has a troll farm. It doesn't matter what term some article used to describe Ukraine's troll farm, Ukraine's troll farm is a troll farm. You have been devastated endlessly, and you clearly can't bear to hear Ukraine's troll farm referred to as the troll farm that it is. But it is a troll farm, your desperate deflections of that fact notwithstanding.
This is semi-incoherent: "You call me Ukrainian because you’re a Russian troll it’s simple, Ukrainian social media I was never on it did you find my name on it know as I just exposed your very own link that you provided, you’re more Ukrainian more Ukrainian then me."
Strange, you think it's unfair to identify you as a Ukrainian, when it's clear that you are completely obsessed with whitewashing Ukraine's troll farm, but you think that someone calling you a Ukrainian makes them a Russian. Hmm... hypocrisy much? The moment I start trying to whitewash Russia's troll farm, as you're doing for Ukraine's, maybe you'll have a reason to suspect me of being Russian.
1
-
1
-
@whitewall9594 So, you don't know what a troll is. I already know that. I've explained it to you ad nauseum:
"A state-run social media manipulation program where thousands of employees post anonymously online to further the government's interests without disclosing that they're posting on behalf of the government, is a troll farm. It is a psyops. And it is an information army. The article calls Ukraine's troll farm an "information army". And an army is something that does combat. And an information army is something that does combat with information. The way that's done is by attacking viewpoint and pushing others - all clandestinely. That is being a troll. When you hide your purpose and have an ulterior motive that isn't disclosed to those you aim to manipulate, you're trolling."
And:
Who cares if the article uses the term "troll farm"? It's still a troll farm, and that's what a troll farm is. An article doesn't have to use the word "troll farm" - Troll Farm isn't even an official description, it's a label given to operations, typically by opponents of it. The UK's "Integrity Initiative" troll farm, for which there was leaked official documents details their instructions of how to confuse and destabilize conversations online, was never called a "troll farm" by "Integrity Initiative", the UK government, or UK MSM articles reporting about it. But it was a troll farm.
You keep saying 'article doesn't say troll farm', but it's never mattered whether it does or doesn't. If a car magazine talks about a specific car model without using the word "car" to refer to it, it's still a car. Whether the article uses the term which describes what that type of operation is, is irrelevant. That operation is a troll farm.
Ukraine's troll farm is a troll farm.
1
-
1
-
@whitewall1948 Why would I post something from the Newsweek article talking about it being a troll farm? I've already answered your interest on that matter:
You keep saying 'article doesn't say troll farm', but it's never mattered whether it does or doesn't. If a car magazine talks about a specific car model without using the word "car" to refer to it, it's still a car. Whether the article uses the term which describes what that type of operation is, is irrelevant. That operation is a troll farm.
Who cares if the article uses the term "troll farm"? It's still a troll farm, and that's what a troll farm is. An article doesn't have to use the word "troll farm" - Troll Farm isn't even an official description, it's a label given to operations, typically by opponents of it. The UK's "Integrity Initiative" troll farm, for which there was leaked official documents details their instructions of how to confuse and destabilize conversations online, was never called a "troll farm" by "Integrity Initiative", the UK government, or UK MSM articles reporting about it. But it was a troll farm.
A state-run social media manipulation program where thousands of employees post anonymously online to further the government's interests without disclosing that they're posting on behalf of the government, is a troll farm. It is a psyops. And it is an information army. The article calls Ukraine's troll farm an "information army". And an army is something that does combat. And an information army is something that does combat with information. The way that's done is by attacking viewpoint and pushing others - all clandestinely. That is being a troll. When you hide your purpose and have an ulterior motive that isn't disclosed to those you aim to manipulate, you're trolling."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The charges by which Navalny and his brother were sentenced - Navalny with a suspended sentence and his brother with a prison sentence, were made by French cosmetic company Yves Rocher. The charges were not fake and, contrary to what Johnny Harris says in his video, they weren't thrown-out. Navalny went to the European Court of Human Rights to protest the charges, and the ECHR ruled that the trial was unfair and arbitrary, but the ECHR didn't toss-out the charges, nor did it have the authority to. Navalny also appealed that the court consider the charges politically motivated, but the ECHR denied Navalny's appeal.
Honestly, a lot of what is said in Johnny Harris' video is not true at all. One other example is that he says Navalny couldn't check-in with the Russian Penitentiary Service because he was in a coma. But there was over 3 months between the time that Navalny was out of his coma and discharged from the hospital, and when he had to check-in by. Navalny was not required to check-in with the Russian Federal Penitentiary Service while he was still recovering in Germany. It was only required after the German hospital reported Navalny was recovered, which was 3 months after he was discharged from the hospital.
1
-
@Justlookingg What you have said is false, Svetlana. I already gave the truthful details of the Yves Rocher case in my comment above. And anybody can verify it for themselves. I'll including the ECHR ruling in a link. The ECHR did not rule the Yves Rocher case illegal. It ruled that Russia had denied Navalny and his brother their right to a fair trial and that Russia must pay Navalny and his brother 76,000 EUR and 460,000 Rubles in damages. But it didn't dismiss the charges and didn't have the authority to. Additionally, the ECHR dismissed Navalny's appeal to have the charges deemed politically motivated.
Yves Rocher has stood by the charges against Navalny, saying, "its Russian subsidiary "acted in accordance with the practices and procedures of all international and independent companies and the more general principle of business ethics.""
The ECHR ruling is here: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22tabview%22:[%22document%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-177665%22]}
There's the actual court itself saying what I said, Svetlana, and it contradicts the falsehood that you have written and smeared me with. So, you have spoken disinformation. I don't know if you're lying or just ignorant or disinformed to the point that you aren't qualified to be talking on the subject. But either way, you owe me an apology. Please do a better job to inform yourself in the future.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Just a heads-up for people: The accounts "White Wall", "William Sam", "Fi Bryar", "Fatty Hendo", "Lloon Burg", "Beth Perkins", and probably others, are all operated by the same person who pretends to be different people with them. They are extremely aggressive, impulsive, can be stalking, and difficult to explain things to. And they have no restraint or compunction against making lies of any size, big or small, even when you'd think it's impossible for them to not know that you know that they're lying. They don't accept correction and are unyielding in their initial insistence. I believe this is because they are on the spectrum.
This person has been extremely sensitive to any talk about Ukraine's large troll farm program and can spend an entire day, more than 10 hours straight, non-stop, saying the same inane or whitewashing comment about it. In general, they mentally block-out all information that doesn't tell them what they want to hear, no matter how inarguably and demonstrably factual it is. They will also pretend they didn't get answers they received to their questions just so that they can continue to badger someone with the already-answered question and pretend with themselves that they're "owning" someone for not getting an answer. It is as detached from reality and normal sanity as it sounds.
With each of their accounts, they show the same very poor English grammar and phrasing, and are sometimes completely unintelligible - especially when they become upset. Yet, even when they're at their very most incoherent, as in, posting fully unintelligible gibberish, they maintain an insistence that they're speaking perfect English. When they spend more time working out a post they can make it appear a bit more normal, though there's typically always some oddities in their writing style. Again, I believe they are on the spectrum and that their behaviour is a result of that.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bethperkin2762 Oh my. I just checked the automatically-withheld comments for my YT page, and wow... this "Beth Perkins", "White Wall", "William Sam", "Fi Bryar", "Fatty Hendo", "Lloon Burg", etc unstable poster hasn't figured-out that they can't make comments on my YT page regardless of how many alt accounts they make. They're going nonstop with creating new accounts to get around a ban on my YT page and post comments there, without realizing that which account they're posting from has nothing to do with the block on their comments, and that all their comments are automatically blocked regardless of which account they use. What a total dummy! HAHAHA!!
They haven't been smart enough to realize they've been burning literal days of their time making new alt accounts all day long and posting things which nobody, including myself, ever sees (unless I check if there's been any automatically-withheld comments). The unintelligence of this "Beth Perkins", etc, person is record-setting. They're a failure of everything they tried to be, haha.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Just a heads-up for people: The accounts "White Wall", "William Sam", "Fi Bryar", "Fatty Hendo", "Lloon Burg", "Beth Perkins", and probably others, are all operated by the same person who pretends to be different people with them. They are extremely aggressive, impulsive, can be stalking, and difficult to explain things to. And they have no restraint or compunction against making lies of any size, big or small, even when you'd think it's impossible for them to not know that you know that they're lying. They don't accept correction and are unyielding in their initial insistence. I believe this is because they are on the spectrum.
This person has been extremely sensitive to any talk about Ukraine's large troll farm program and can spend an entire day, more than 10 hours straight, non-stop, saying the same inane or whitewashing comment about it. In general, they mentally block-out all information that doesn't tell them what they want to hear, no matter how inarguably and demonstrably factual it is. They will also pretend they didn't get answers they received to their questions just so that they can continue to badger someone with the already-answered question and pretend with themselves that they're "owning" someone for not getting an answer. It is as detached from reality and normal sanity as it sounds.
With each of their accounts, they show the same very poor English grammar and phrasing, and are sometimes completely unintelligible - especially when they become upset. Yet, even when they're at their very most incoherent, as in, posting fully unintelligible gibberish, they maintain an insistence that they're speaking perfect English. When they spend more time working out a post they can make it appear a bit more normal, though there's typically always some oddities in their writing style. Again, I believe they are on the spectrum and that their behaviour is a result of that.
1
-
1
-
1