Comments by "This Channel" (@thischannel1071) on "CBC News" channel.

u2good2b4gotn It's not like any country's officials have never lied. But whatever you're presuming you know they lied about, you're very likely mistaken because most of what's reported in our news about Russia and its leader is, in-fact, lies. And how can you debunk something like this? By the fact that most prior allegations of such have been discredited, while there's still one that's unconfirmed, and the conspiracy theory about the current event is already discredited as the doctors who have been looking after Navalny have already said they've found no trace of poison in him. And he's been examined by Germany doctors since around 10 hours ago as of my making this post. Your perception of what Russia has lied about is informed by disinformation. And when you suspect something concerning the current topic based on past disinfo that you're unaware was disinfo, you're rationalizing a conspiracy theory with other, already-debunked conspiracy theories.
5
@МашаИванова-е5л Why would Putin be punished for something Putin had no involvement in? Navalny's doctors say he wasn't poisoned. So stop the conspiracy theory. And who would have poisoned him? Not Russia's government - that's the last party that would. The US, UK, or possibly Ukraine might as a false flag against him. Navalny is a relative nobody in Russia, and he is no threat to Russia's government unless someone makes a martyr of him - and Russia's government isn't going to do that.
5
@МашаИванова-е5л The idea that Navalny's tea was poisoned is a discredited conspiracy theory. The airport security camera footage showing Navalny's assistant buy his tea and then hand it to him, and then him drink it without disturbance, has been released to the public. Nobody poisoned his tea, unless the person behind the counter happened to have some spare poison on them that day that Navalny's assistant just happened to order tea for him. Or, unless Navalny's assistant poisoned the tea, herself. It isn't just Russian doctors looking after Navalny in the hospital, it is also German doctors who have flown there and exmained him. There would be security and special guards for Navalny because the allegation of it being a poisoning makes it a criminal case, and potentially a false-flag attack against Russia's government. Navalny is only a threat to Russia's government as a martyr, and so Russia's government is the last party that is going to want to see him harmed.
5
@MrMoogIe No, there are no videos of Russian mercs gunning down civilians in Syria and Libya. You are a liar. There is, however, video showing US troops killing civilians in Iraq and Syria. And all of the US' presence in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and Libya, is immoral and unjustified. The US has murdered millions of people in the Middle East in the past 20 years. So, don't talk about Russia there - Russia is who saved Syria from being the next country to be destroyed by the US. And don't forget to stop lying.
5
That's a debunked conspiracy theory.
3
No, he didn't. No poison was detected in Navalny's system. And it's been reported that Germany's doctors agree with the Russian doctors' initial assessment. Russia's government would be the last party to harm Navalny. He's a relative nobody in Russia with a 2% public approval rating. He's not taken very seriously there, he's just a mascot for Western prop@ganada against Russia. If anyone harmed Navalny, it would be an enemy of the Russian government, doing it as a false flag attack to create trouble for the Russian government.
3
Russia's phase 3 testing has been in progress since August 12th, and its phase 3 testing will be completed before the vaccine is available to the general public.
2
No. And neither has Navalny. Nor is he the opposition in Russia. If he had been eligible to run in Russia's previous election, he would have come in 4th place.
2
@iambiggus That doesn't explain anything. I'm not being naive in the least. But you are being extremely naive in defending an argument that is patently irrational, using a tired quote. If this was a poisoning, then it is the most obvious false flag attack in the history of false flag attacks. The timing of it was intended to undermine a ton of Russia's interests: Their National flag day was the next day. Trump was wanting to invite Putin to the WH. It occurred 3 weeks before Russia's regional elections and stands to sway votes away from RU government-friendly candidates. There's unrest in belarus and a scandal in Russia could tie their hands and make it politically too politically costly to intervene. It helps the US add pressure against EU countries participating in Nord Stream 2. So, stop being naive. What happened to Navalny obviously was not an attack by Russia's government.
1
@Shin-gq4pu Are you that naive? It is certain that if Navalny was deliberately attacked, that it wasn't by the Russian government. Harming Navalny, who is a relative nobody in Russia and has a 2% public approval rating, only undermines Russia's government's interests. Even New York Times' editorial board wrote an article saying this, that the more likely scenario is that someone would harm him to damage the reputation of Russia's government since Navalny is more threatening to the Russian government as a martyr than as a dissident.
1
@Shin-gq4pu If even the notoriously prop@gandzing and Putin-loathing NYT can see that Russia'g government is unlikely to be behind an attack on Navalny, then so too should you be capable of that basic level of rational thought. In summary, you're a clown. Try to at least not be a delusional one. But here, you have presented yourself as both.
1
@garyenwards1608 There are no past opposition leaders that are known to have been killed by Russia's government. You're an example of how uninformed and harmful to other peoples' level of informedness a person becomes when they have bought into conspiracy theories.
1
@garyenwards1608 Of course Russia wouldn't. And neither would the US, UK, Ukraine, and many individuals and groups within and outside Russia, would they? I don't think I'm falling for anybody's lies. And I hope you try to not, as well.
1
@teamhadd5235 Not exactly. Russia allowed for two consecutive terms. But there was no limit on the overall number of terms a person could serve as president. So, a person could serve two terms, then stay away for a term, and then serve another two terms. That's what Putin did: He served two terms as Russia's President, then became Russia's Prime Minister for a term, and then served another term as President, and is now on his first consecutive term to the last one since he took a break to be Russia's PM. In total, Putin has been Russia's President for 16 years. Canada, Australia, the UK, and Germany have still all had longer-serving heads-of-state than Putin has been Russia's. That was how Russia's law on presidential terms worked until recently, when they changed the law to impose a maximum of two terms in total. So, going forward, a person can't serve more than two terms in Russia. But Russia's presidential terms are also now 6 years, which means a person can serve a total of 12 years as Russia's president.
1
Or, so go some conspiracy theories (most of them debunked), anway.
1
@Count Floyd That's about as br@in-washed a position as there is. No reason, to logic, just an attitude of 'because I've been programmed to think this'.
1
@Count Floyd Of course you have screenshots of me claiming to be Canadian... because I am Canadian - unlike you, who is a USer. When a person receives information objectively from a variety of sources and not just the one that's shoved in-front of their face, they gain a greater perspective. And then when they see ignorance and lies being told, they have the information to stamp it out, and, hopefully the interest in doing so. Not being ignorant shouldn't be an offence to you. And it's odd that even when you detect that what you're saying is false, you still double-down on it because you think the truth isn't something a Canadian would say. And that's a very unflattering and offensive conception of what a Canadian is. Where in Canada have you been that you expect Canadians to lie?
1
@Count Floyd Wrong, as usual. What no Canadian does is spend 3 days pushing falsehoods and trying to hide that they're pushing falsehoods. Look at yourself: You think you've got someone in a gotcha for speaking truth in roughly the same about of posts that you've been speaking lies for the past 3 days. Which one do you think is a waste of time? Obviously, you have no life and nothing of value to do with your time, and so you look for ways to waste it - that, or you're paid in USD to post, just like you said you were. Way to expose yourself, USer.
1
@Count Floyd No, we don't say "American" - at least most of us don't. That term is offensive to many Canadians because America is a continent and Canada is also a part of America. The USA means 'the united state of [continent] America', and not 'the united states [that are] America'. Canadians are Americans. Mexicans are Americans. The almost half-a-billion South American population will tell you that they're Americans - and they were called Americans before people from the US were. The first place to be called "America" was modern-day Brazil. In Canada, we normally call USers just as 'from the US', 'US citizen', etc. Yank is slang that I guess sounds cool to teenagers. I don't really use it anymore. But the most concise way to call a US citizen is "USer". And it works. The fact that you're arguing that "we" in Canada call USers "American" demonstrates that you aren't a Canadian but are a USer. People in the US call themselves "American" referring to their national identity only as a misnomer and hubris.
1
@Count Floyd You, not being a Canadian, don't know what Canadians care about. And look at you continuing to post nonsense for 3 days in a row. Who does that? No Canadian cares to waste their time like that.
1
Why? This story has nothing to do with Putin. Russia's government is the last party that would want Navalny harmed, because the only way he's dangerous to the Russian government is as a martyr. If Navalny were poisoned (and the report is that he hasn't been), then it would be an obvious false-flag operation, of the kind that the US and UK do pretty often. Ukraine would also be suspect.
1
@internetexpert8153 I guess that CBC doesn't want me to tell you what it's all about, because every time that I do, my comment is censored. That should tell you what it's all about.
1
What's Navalny's domestic approval rating - 2%? Navalny is not taken very seriously in Russia - he is mainly a mascot for Western prop@ganda media, meant to sell a depiction of Russian public opinion against their government that is largely not true. The only people who would harm Navalny are those wanting to create trouble for and anger against the Russian government. Navalny is no threat to the Russian government, and the RU gov't is the last party that would choose to harm him because of the guaranteed backlash and because he is, overall, not a threat to them. The RU gov't would also not do it in public, where he could be treated quickly, and using a method that has gained (without being substantiated, though) a cartoonish association as a signature of the RU gov't. If he was poisoned (though his doctors said they found no trace of poison in him), then it was as a false flag operation against the RU gov't.
1